Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   States petition for secession
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 384 (679338)
11-13-2012 12:01 PM


Secession.
It's very possible that the entity the United States of America has outlived its value, had its day in the sun and so like so many other empires in the past will dissolve, and if so, a peaceful dissolution would be preferable. The states so far that have filed such petitions are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Frankly, I would hope that the President's response would be, "If your state passes a resolution to secede I will support your position in Congress and before the SCOTUS. Should Congress and the SCOTUS agree that it could be done legally within our Constitution I will immediate recognize your state as a new nation and begin discussions with you on matters of trade, compensation for Federal Properties and facilities within the borders of your new nation, immigration and visa issues, establishing border entry and exit locations, tariffs, and other issues of mutual concern."

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 12 of 384 (679345)
11-13-2012 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tempe 12ft Chicken
11-13-2012 12:06 PM


Foreign Nationals
Also, talk about giving the shaft to all of the Veterans from a state that served the US military. All of the benefits they receive would probably disappear upon changing to citizenship of the country of Texas (I could be wrong on this, and benefits could remain with changing citizenship.
That would be up to the individual I imagine. I don't see any reason they could not maintain the status of a Foreign National residing in the Nation of Texas (or substitute any other ex-state) in which case they would receive the same benefits as they would if they had retired or taken up residency in any other country.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tempe 12ft Chicken, posted 11-13-2012 12:06 PM Tempe 12ft Chicken has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Tempe 12ft Chicken, posted 11-13-2012 12:17 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 384 (679349)
11-13-2012 12:24 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Tempe 12ft Chicken
11-13-2012 12:17 PM


Re: Foreign Nationals
Okay, so if they chose to remain a US citizen, living in the country of Texas then Veteran's benefits could still be conferred but if they were to choose to join the citizenship of the country of Texas, renouncing US citizenship, then benefits are lost? Am I understanding that correctly now?
The details would be determined by the US Congress but I imagine it would be similar to whatever laws currently govern renouncing US citizenship.
Also, if it were to happen, should build a wall around Texas to keep illegal immigrants from coming into the United States?
Of course. There would have to be border patrol checkpoints just like there are between the US and Canada or Mexico. There would have to be visas; if for example should a Texan wish to visit New Mexico or family in Chicago they would need a valid passport and visa and go through US Customs.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Tempe 12ft Chicken, posted 11-13-2012 12:17 PM Tempe 12ft Chicken has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 16 of 384 (679352)
11-13-2012 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rahvin
11-13-2012 12:28 PM


Re: Didn't we already address this issue?
Yes, the US Civil War was a precedent but that does not mean it cannot change. Dred-Scott set a precedent.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rahvin, posted 11-13-2012 12:28 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 17 of 384 (679354)
11-13-2012 12:38 PM


US Federal Jobs.
Currently the ten states with the highest number of Federal employees are California, Virginia, Texas, Maryland, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania, New York, Washington and Ohio. Most of those jobs would immediately disappear and some would be replaced by a consulate or embassy position.
source

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by fearandloathing, posted 11-13-2012 12:42 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 21 of 384 (679360)
11-13-2012 1:06 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by fearandloathing
11-13-2012 12:42 PM


Re: US Federal Jobs.
It's not just the Federal jobs. The nation of Texas would lose funding for about 350,000 positions but only about 2% of the land area is US Federal property, but in North Carolina almost 12% of the land is Federal Property.
That land would either have to be excluded from the state or the US compensated for its value.
Other states like California face even larger financial burdens since over 40% of the land area in California is US Federal Property.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by fearandloathing, posted 11-13-2012 12:42 PM fearandloathing has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(3)
Message 33 of 384 (679390)
11-13-2012 5:10 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Coyote
11-13-2012 4:19 PM


Why would anyone object?
Is there any post in this thread that implies anyone would object? Personally I think the secession petitions are hilarious and that the right response from the White House should be "Go for it!".

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Coyote, posted 11-13-2012 4:19 PM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Taq, posted 11-13-2012 5:53 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 35 of 384 (679394)
11-13-2012 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Taq
11-13-2012 5:53 PM


The Liberal parts of Texas and fences.
Surprisingly Texas is not one of the big supporters of the border fence, at least those sections along the border are not strong supporters.
But it is also the most liberal area of the Texas.
Edited by jar, : fix sub-title.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Taq, posted 11-13-2012 5:53 PM Taq has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 38 of 384 (679437)
11-13-2012 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Omnivorous
11-13-2012 9:13 PM


Re: Be careful what you wish for...
And if the US sends Ambassador Glaspie to Texas then Louisiana had better move their troops to the border.
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Omnivorous, posted 11-13-2012 9:13 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Omnivorous, posted 11-13-2012 9:52 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 54 of 384 (686199)
12-29-2012 6:45 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by RAZD
12-29-2012 6:20 PM


Re: letting texas go?
There's a great misconception that Texas is a homogenous character but if you look at the county by county 2012 Presidential returns a different picture emerges. The counties that went for Obama included cities like San Antonio, El Paso, Houston, Dallas, Beaumont, Alice, Kingsville, Austin and almost all of the Valley.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by RAZD, posted 12-29-2012 6:20 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by RAZD, posted 12-29-2012 8:24 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 56 of 384 (686210)
12-29-2012 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by RAZD
12-29-2012 8:24 PM


Re: letting texas go?
Hey, I live in the home town of Lloyd Bentsen, one of the very liberal areas in the state.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by RAZD, posted 12-29-2012 8:24 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(3)
Message 384 of 384 (689774)
02-04-2013 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by Faith
01-28-2013 12:36 AM


Re: Virtual States
Faith writes:
The first amendment was intended to PROTECT a Christian's right to teach our children our Christian principles but it's been perverted into the exact opposite meaning.
That of course is simply another example of you posting falsehoods. You have every right to continue teaching your children all of the falsehoods and nonsense you want. There are NO prohibitions against that in the US.
It's just unfortunate for you that reality exists and that your children might get exposed to reality, honesty, truth and facts.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Faith, posted 01-28-2013 12:36 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024