So difficult to keep up! (Re: Memeber of the religious right running morally amuck)

was it the chin dildo? i once went to a fetish party and there was this guy in a black and yellow rubber suit with a big black rubber dick bouncing around on his chin. it was so amusing. boingy boingy.and as to your questions of why i was at a fetish party... it was like a costume ball for me.

eh. i promise, i have boring old married people sex. my only fetish is being amazingly adorable! like this morning in the shower i did the kitty cat butt wiggle and jumped on the fiance and huggled him<3

says who?

i see. how interesting. ah well. everything else would have been fine, but that condom... that's gonna send him to hell.

my uncle will be glad. there's a complete jerkoff who cleared land right up to his property for a shopping center including a "video" store.

i think i'll pass.

some stats.lit review of child sexual abuse from 1992-2001about child sex abuse victimshowever, this site http://www.stopitnow.com/comquest.html#Q2 says if we trust the last source, i think it is quite safe to say that 5% of so called straight men have raped a child.*EDIT*THIS PART IS A SEPARATE THOUGHT*/EDIT*the idea that homosexuality (and other "perversions") is caused by child sexual abuse is an old one and not necessarily debunked as far as i know. now. that's not to say that i believe it, or that ALL homosexuality is caused by it, but it is possible that there are a variety of causes (including inateness) which may be culture-specific. namely, maybe only in the west does abuse and rape contribute to homosexuality. the idea behind this may be that boys who are raped by a man close to them may learn that the only way to receive love from men is sexual. and women who are raped may learn to distrust men. this reaction would of course be related to the ways we treat sex according to gender. it's a very interesting question. but, we know that promiscuity can be related to abuse, so why not other varieties of sexual activity? of course, it must be open to working both ways. maybe someone who was born gay might "turn straight" because he was abused as a child. Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

i'm not straight.i chose to date my fiance. i chose to date the man i dated before him. i chose to fool around with various (not a large number) men and women throughout my time of experience. i don't trust people whose lifestyle and behavior are based solely on people they tend to have in their beds.i didn't say it was a choice, and i did discuss innate sexuality, thanks. however, there are lots of psychological factors that may help determine our various activities, including our sexualities. i frankly think we choose our sexual partners in isolation according to factors outside our control and "homosexuality" and "heterosexuality" are labels we define ourself with based on our choices (which aren't so much choices, really).who we are and what we do in EVERYTHING ELSE can be affected by our life experiences. i'm simply suggesting that it's not entirely insane to think that sexual behavior might, in part, be affected by experiences as well. but to suggest that homosexuality only occurs as a result of child abuse is silly.bottom line: there's a difference between environmental influences on behavior and choices.Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

yes. but 5% is less than 14% and obviously included. i never said chose. you did. i've been here for years and have never said chose. i'm suggesting that being raped affects your personality and potentially your behavior. but that particular point was intended to say that it is more than reasonable to think that 5% of supposedly straight men are rapists. just because the rate is the same doesn't necessarily mean that the causes are the same. i don't have that data. i agree. i didn't. i simply found some. they don't even seem to agree with each other. *i* would assume that they are underreported as well. thus, the numbers here are safely a minimum.

i do as well. i was discussing a theory that others have held and the possibility that environmental factors *might* have an effect on various kinds of behavior. we *know* that sexual abuse can cause promiscuity. wanting to get laid can also cause promiscuity. the presence of the one does not nulify the other. one source of non-strictly-heterosxual behavior is likely innate desire. another source may be factors that affect the ability to trust and be close to certain people.

lol oops. but still.

i think you may have a similar problem with underreporting. also, what about people who are primarily "straight" but have had partners of the same sex? what about instilled institutions of such bahaviors? how about people who consistently date members of one sex but settle down with a member of the other sex (whether it's the same as theirs or not)? how about bisexuality? do you include these in your numbers?attraction may well be genetic. behavior may not neccessarily be.

i meant institution in that marriage is an institution. also, what keeps hunter-gatherers from having institutions? also, the greeks were a bit more than hunter-gatherers and they had QUITE an institution. (is that your university, or are you just happy to see me?) i don't think i have an ethnocentric view of gender or sexuality. or rather, i don't have a view of gender, and i think sexuality is an individual behavior that occurs in isolation from labels and "orintations" and lifestyles. i am quite aware. i'm not disputing that there is probably a genetic predisposition to "homosexual" behavior. i am disputing that this predisposition is the only ruler of behavior. there seems to be a genetic predisposition to alcoholism (i'm not equating the two on a value-basis, i just can't think of anything warm and fuzzy right now. i thought this was a better option than breast cancer, but you could easily interchange the two or any other genetically predisposed thing.), but there are other potential factors and alcoholism may or may not occur to that individual. to discuss cancer, i'm sure there is a chance that an individual may have a genetic predisposition to a variety and get that variety for a completely different reason. but we don't know much about the causes of cancer, so that's really besides the point.

generally, nobody looks good in a wetsuit.

do you dispute this? cause that's cute.