First off, Mark, It is rude to do this on another forum, one to which I am not a member and then expect me to come here to defend myself against your misunderstandings,...
I, personally, do not find total fault in mpb1's bringing your thoughts and material to this, a different forum. His failure, however, was to not provide specific links in message 1, per where he was pulling your input from (see my message
message 9). And it was also an administrative failure in not insisting those links were there prior to the topic being promoted out of the "Proposed New Topics" forum (we try to do quality control on the beginnings of new topics, prior to them being released to open debate).
I do think it was a nice touch on his part, to notify you that he was bring the discussion to . Now, if he expected you to follow him here, that is another matter. Of course, you should not be expected to do such, although it is nice of you to have done such.
If you choose to post further at this forum, there are various coding devices available for formatting things, including creating quote boxes. Please see the
dBCodes On link for further information, or use the "Peak" function link at the bottom of individual messages. The "Peak" version of the message shows the raw text, including any coding.
Again, welcome to . You have put out many fine articles, including the ever popular "Morton's Demon", available at
http://home.entouch.net/dmd/mortonsdemon.htm,
The Talk.Origins Archive Post of the Month: February 2002, and
http://www.answersincreation.org/mortond.htm (amongst other places, I'm sure).
Adminnemooseus (Minnemooseus, when not in the admin mode)
ps: Normally I guide the membership to respond to admin messages at an appropriate topic elsewhere. But in this case, I think the appropriate topic is this topic.
pps to Jar, re:
Message 16:
Jar writes:
First, Glen sometimes posts here as well and is very much aware of EvC.
Although Glenn's materials have been cited at , he is new to the forum as a poster.