I never said that we shouldn't get our information from them. I believe that we should also get our information from sources other than them.
...so somehow gathering interpreted information from an even larger number of sources suddenly makes it okay?
Wouldn't that just increase the probability that the said source is putting its own spin on it? It would save you tons of time if you just looked at the evidence yourself.
There's a difference between getting a second opinion and going to an alternative medicine quack just on the basis of opinion "diversity".