Proof of evolution!!!

If jar could do that, it would provide evidence that a cell could arise by design.Since you apparently believe that jar could not do that, then you have evidence against the design hypothesis.Granted, the evidence at this stage is too weak to settle the issue. I'm just pointing out that your argument does not in any way support your claim.

Sure it is. This you assert, but without proof. It remains uncertain. Sure it is evidence. It is not proof, and I never claimed that it is proof. It is evidence, but rather weak evidence. You have eliminated yourself as a possible designer.In your statement about cells, I took you as implicitly saying that no person can design a cell. That eliminated a lot of possible designers, so it was stronger evidence. I'll grant that it was not conclusive. But it does indicate that you were appealing to an unknown designer, so it makes it that much harder for you to demonstrate design.

Yet, at the same time we were making babies but not designing them, animals were making baby animals but not designing them. The babies differed a little from their parents. So evolution seemed to be going on without requiring a designer. That's okay. Many people, including many evolutionists, agree with that.The argument isn't over whether we are designed. The argument is over whether ID is science.However your argument, the argument for this thread, is over whether we are designed, and so far you haven't provided any persuasive evidence.

We can leave the thread open, in case you decide to come back to it.