Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation as presented in Genesis chapters 1 and 2
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 107 of 607 (561307)
05-19-2010 8:56 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Straggler
05-19-2010 7:20 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
ICANT it seems obvious to numerous theistic and atheistic observers that the bible is simply telling the same story twice in ways which are inconsistent. On what basis do you reject this seemingly obvious conclusion?
First off if you can read and understand english and the construction of the Hebrew language it is not so obvious.
If you are one of those atheistic observers, why don't you take my affirmations verse by verse and and show me where I go wrong.
I am prepared to defend my position. But there is no reason to keep stating my position over and over.
If you know one of those theistic observers why not convince one of them to rebut my affirmations.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Straggler, posted 05-19-2010 7:20 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:47 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 111 of 607 (561601)
05-21-2010 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by Peg
05-19-2010 10:52 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
So if the first day comes in vs 5, what came before it? No days are mentioned, but the existing earth was mentioned.
But it was evening in vs 5 as that evening and the next morning was the first complete light and dark period.
So where was the light period?
Peg writes:
In vs 2 it says 'the earth was formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of the waters'....this is an existing earth but no life was present for it says the earth was void.
So the earth existed and was covered with water.
Would you say the earth was uninhabitable?
Peg writes:
the problem i can see here is that Gen chpt 2 is speaking about the creation of mankind....not the earth. So the context has completely changed. It has nothing to do with the 'earth' but has everything to do with 'mankind'
In Genesis 2:4-25 these things took place.
Mankind was formed from the dust of the ground and God breathed the breath of life into that form and it became a living being. verse 7
God planted a garden. verse 8
Out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; verse 9
Out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; verse 19
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman. verse 22
I agree that Genesis 2:4 through 2:25 has nothing to do with the creation of the earth. But it is the history of the heaven and the earth in the day the Lord God created the heaven and the earth.
Now it did have something to do with the earth.
Man was formed from the dust of the earth.
The earth produced whatever God planted and it also produces all fruit bearing trees.
All the creatures and fowl were produced from the earth. verse 19
So the earth was involved.
Peg writes:
so this obviously came before there was any light because no light is mentioned...only darkness.
The earth was not created in Genesis 1:2=31.
The earth was in existence at Genesis 1:2 which you agreed to.
Genesis writes:
2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Does this verse say these are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created?
Does this verse say, when they were created in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens?
Did God call the light day in Genesis 1:5?
Did God call the dark portion night in Genesis 1:5?
Did God call that evening and the morning (start of next light period) the first day?
Was the ending of that light period that ended the first day along with the following dark period called the second day? Genesis 1:8
It seems to me there was a light period in which God created the heaven and the earth which was call day. But evening had come in Genesis 1:2.
Peg writes:
Gen2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth and all their army came to their COMPLETION.
You are not quoting the KJV and what it says is what I am affirming.
KJV writes:
Genesis 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
I believe that Gods creating began in Genesis 1:1 in the beginning., and ended in Genesis 1:27 as declared in Genesis 2:1.
God has not bara created anything since that point in time as He is still resting from creating. IOW He is not creating at the present time. He will in the future.
Peg writes:
You also still havnt commented on why Jesus himself spoke of the Gen 1 and 2 as if it was one account. If anyone knew the truth it would be him.
You don't find this in Genesis chapter 1.
KJV writes:
Matthew 19:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
KJV writes:
Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
A male person was created.
KJV writes:
Genesis 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
A female person was created from the rib of the man.
The man said this is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. For that reason they shall be one flesh.
I don't find that anywhere in the creation story in Genesis chapter 1:2=27.
I find it concerning the man and woman created in the day the heavens and the earth was created as they are part of that history.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by Peg, posted 05-19-2010 10:52 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 5:40 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 112 of 607 (561602)
05-21-2010 7:54 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Straggler
05-20-2010 4:47 AM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
Why would I do that?
Because that would be honest debate.
Straggler writes:
Is it possible that the bible is just saying the same stuff twice in ways that are a bit inconsistent? Can you see why you seem to be alone on this?
But I am not alone in believing there are two separate creation stories in Genesis chapter 1 and chapter 2. Most modern scholars agree with me. Shucks crashfrog even agrees that there are 2 creations stories in Genesis chapters 1 and 2.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Straggler, posted 05-20-2010 4:47 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Straggler, posted 05-21-2010 8:02 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 114 of 607 (561611)
05-21-2010 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by New Cat's Eye
05-20-2010 10:16 AM


Re: inconsistency
Hi CS,
Catholic Scientist writes:
One of your problems is using the phrase "in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens" in Gen 2:4, as absolutely having to be referring to Gen 1:1. Just because they use similiar verbiage doesn't mean they have to be literaly the exact same thing.
Genesis 1:1 says "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
So was the heaven and the earth created in Genesis 1:1?
If it was not created then, in what light period was it created?
Straggler writes:
Also, with Gen 1:1, you think that it must be declarative, and that it must mean that the earth was totally complete at that time.
What is a declarative statement?
According to th University of Otawa:
The declarative sentence is the most important type. You can, and often will write entire essays or reports using only declarative sentences, and you should always use them far more often than any other type. A declarative sentence simply states a fact or argument, without requiring either an answer or action from the reader
Source
Genesis 1:1 makes a complete statement requiring nothing from the reader.
It has a subject God.
It has a verb created which denotes completed action.
The result of that action was that the heaven and the earth existed.
Therefore Genesis 1:1 Declared God created which was a completed action, heaven and earth.
Catholic Scientist writes:
You put Noah's Flood between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2 as the cause of it being covered in water, right?
Wrong I have Noah's Flood at the conventional time.
Peter refers to Genesis 1:2 in:
Peter writes:
2 Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
Peter said the old world perished there was no survivors.
Catholic Scientist writes:
Rather than put more time in this, I'll see how you reply first and we can go from there.
If you decide to put more time into it, it probably would not hurt to click on ICANT Posts Only and read what I have actually said.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-20-2010 10:16 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-26-2010 11:48 AM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 115 of 607 (561614)
05-21-2010 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Straggler
05-21-2010 8:02 PM


Re: What Would You Consider A Valid Refutation?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
ICANT can you clarify what it is you want here? What will it take for you to consider your position on this refuted?
In the OP I said:
ICANT writes:
In this thread I will affirm that there are 2 creations presented in Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
In this thread the KJV, LXX and Hebrew text will be used.
The Bible will be the final authority as that is what we will be discussing.
I am not affirming what someone else has said that the KJV Bible says. It makes no difference if the entire Bible is a myth as some claim. It makes no difference if one, two, three or even four different groups wrote the stories recorded in Chapter 1 and 2 of Genesis.
I have simply went verse by verse and affirmed what the verses say.
For someone to refute them they would have to take the ones they disagree with and point out where I have misrepresented what is written in the text of the KJV Bible.
So if you could prove the KJV Bible does not say in Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
If you could prove that Genesis 2:4 does not say " These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,"
If you could prove all the things listed in the history (generations) of the heaven and the earth did not take place in the same light period as the creation of the heaven and the earth.
If you could prove that the heavens and the earth did not exist at Genesis 1:2.
If you could prove that the mankind male and female created in Genesis 1:27 was ever put in a garden and forbidden to eat the fruit of any tree.
I think these would be enough to convince me I didn't have any idea what Genesis chapter 1 and 2 said.
Problem is you only have what is written in the first 2 chapters of Genesis to refute what is written in those 2 chapters.
I made my case throughout this thread and on several occasions asked if anyone cared to refute what I said was written in the first 2 chapters of Genesis.
So far no one has made an honest attempt to do so.
Would you care to give it a go?
Straggler writes:
Who?
crashfrog a died in the wool atheist poster of EvC.
In Message 50 the following statement:
crashfrog writes:
It's much more likely, based on the text, that it's simply a concatenation of two different regional oral histories; two variants of the same story that slowly "evolved" differences. (The irony is truly astounding.)
Again, this is the most reasonable conclusion based on reading the text. Of course, I don't read Hebrew, and the original manuscripts are not avaliable to any of us. But in regards to the Bible as it is presented in English, Gen 1 and Gen 2 are obviously both chronological accounts that don't agree. Trying to say that you "know" that one of them is not a chronological account, and then offering as evidence their disagreement doesn't fly. They could disagree for more likely reasons, including error.
He says two stories that don't agree.
I have a personal e-mail that confirms the same that they are two different stories but they are both myths so what difference does it make.
There are places here where we discussed the same issues that he presented the same thoughts but I am to lazy to look them up.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Straggler, posted 05-21-2010 8:02 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by hooah212002, posted 05-21-2010 9:46 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 119 by Straggler, posted 05-23-2010 5:25 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 118 of 607 (561807)
05-23-2010 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Peg
05-23-2010 5:40 AM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
So rather then conclude that the 'evenings' mentioned could be figurative, you assume that because vs 5 says there was a first evening and morning, you conclude that there must have been a light period before light is mentioned?
I conclude there was a day because Genesis 2:4 says the heaven and the earth was created in a day, verses a night.
Peg writes:
I wonder why moses wasnt instructed to write about it.
Moses writes:
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
He did mention it.
Peg writes:
at that point in time, yes.
So in Genesis 1:2 was uninhabitable.
But Isaiah says:
Isaiah writes:
45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else.
Isaiah records that God said He did not create it in vain. Same words used here as in Genesis 1:2.
So did God lie to Isaiah or has man been interperting Genesis 1:2 wrong?
Peg writes:
you dont think its possible that Moses could have used that terminology and then go on to describe mankinds appearance without infering the earths creation?
But my words you quoted specifically say the history had nothing to do with the creation of the heaven and the earth.
It did have with forming man from the dust of the ground.
It did have the planting of a garden.
It did have the God causing the ground to produce fruit trees, herbs and all plants.
It did have God forming all creatures including fowl from the ground.
It did have God making a woman out of the rib of man.
These people were put in the garden God had planted.
They were told they could eat from all trees but one.
Since all these things were bara created by God, why do you suggest this history was only about manking?
The only things bara created in Genesis 1:2-27 was water creatures and mankind, male and female. Everything else was called forth after its kind. All vegetation was called forth from the seed that was upon the ground.
Where did those seeds come from?
The last I knew you had to have plants with fruit to produce seed.
Peg writes:
Nothing he says goes into the same details as he did in chpt 1 and you can see the context of what he's talking about quite easily. Its mankinds appearance that he discusses, nothing more.
Would the detail be the same if he was talking about two different things?
There is a history of Genesis 1:1 recorded in Genesis 2:4-4:25 that has nothing to do with Genesis 1:2-2:3.
They are two different stories about two different events.
Peg writes:
However you seem to be saying that there were two different creations and i dont understand why you would be saying that.
I am saying there was a creation in Genesis 1:1 and the history of that creation was recorded in Genesis 2:4-4:25.
I am saying there was an event recorded in Genesis 1:2-2:3 in which the only things bara created was water creatures and mankind in the image of God.
Peg writes:
The earth was created a very long time ago along with the rest of the universe....the earth was one of the heavenly bodies created as part of the universe so of course i was existing in Vs 1. But there was no life on it until God created the right conditions.
If there was no life on earth until 6,000+ years ago would you please explain to this old farm boy where all the trillions of tons of peat came from that produced all our natural gas, oil, and coal came from
Peg writes:
What you are speculating is that after the completion of Gods creations (earth, animals, vegetation, man) he went on to create a new man and woman (adam and eve) as if there were already a human population on earth before adam and eve were created.
thats pure speculation based on reading the text in a chronological order. But why are you reading the text in a chronological order? The context itself shows that Chpt 2 is not a chronological account.
Why do you say I am speculating. I examined each of the verses under question you refuse to go verse by verse and rebut them.
I know the thing in the 2 chapters are not in chronological order. That is the reason I have said Genesis 2:4-4:25 should follow Genesis 1:1 as 2:4 says this is the history of the heaven and the earth in the day the heaven and the earth was created.
I even listed the things between the 2 stories that can not be reconciled into one story which you nor anyone else has addressed.
In the story in Genesis 2:4-25 the man was formed from the dust of the ground and the woman made from one of his ribs. They were placed in a garden and forbidden to eat the fruit of one tree.
In the story in Genesis 1:2-31 the man and woman was made at the same time in the image of God. They were never placed in a garden nor were they forbidden to eat the fruit from any tree. They were told to multiply and replenish the earth.
That is just two major differences.
How can they be a record of the same thing?
Peg writes:
Chpt 1 is a chronological account
Genesis 1:2-Genesis 2:3 is a chronological account of what happened some 6000+ years ago.
Genesis 2:4-4:25 is a chronological account of what happened in the beginning in the day God created the heaven and the earth.
So you see they are chronological accounts they just are not in chronological order in the Bible.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 5:40 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 7:09 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 121 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 7:27 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 122 of 607 (561833)
05-23-2010 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Straggler
05-23-2010 5:25 PM


Re: What Would You Consider A Valid Refutation?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
And I agree that the two storeis don't agree perfectly. So what is your point?
From the OP:
ICANT writes:
In this thread I will affirm that there are 2 creations presented in Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
My point is there are two stories one in chapter 1 and 1 in chapter 2.
Thanks for confirming my affirmation.
Straggler writes:
Namely that it is the same story being told in two differently flawed ways.
Now you are asserting that the two stories are the same just being told differently.
Would you care to show how they could be one story with all the many differences within them?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Straggler, posted 05-23-2010 5:25 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Straggler, posted 05-24-2010 8:25 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 123 of 607 (561836)
05-23-2010 8:24 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Peg
05-23-2010 7:09 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
And think about it, if the earth was created in 1 day, how many days must the millions/billions of other heavenly bodies in the universe have taken to create? If the earth took 1 day, then surely every other planet took 1 day each at least....that would amount to milllions/billions of days, yes?
How small is the God you serve?
My God spoke and all those things existed at once. He is no 90 pound weakling.
Peg writes:
So could the yom/day in Gen 2:4 really just be 1 24hr day? I dont think so.
The only dark period the day the heaven and the earth was created in is found at Genesis 1:2.
I never said that light period was 24 hours long or any length as far as that is concerned. God had not set the clock in motion and there was not light periods and dark periods to keep time by. There was only a light period.
Which would prove beneficial to all the vegetation required to make all of the fossile fuel available.
The light period started in the beginning and lasted untill the evening we find in Genesis 1:2
That is the reason that from the evening until the morning was only 12 hours but yet called the first day. When you include the light period the heavens and the earth was created in you have a complete day. Not just the light portion that is called day.
If you check in Revelation you will find that the New heaven and earth will have a light period but no night.
Peg writes:
you are taking Isaiah out of context. Isaiah 45 is a prophecy about King Cyrus freeing the then captive Jews from their bondage. Thru Isaiah God is reassuring the captives that they will not be left without salvation...He assures them that his purposes will be realised because he did not create them or the earth in vain. He has a purpose and it will be fulfilled.
No I did not take God out of context.
God is detailing in a message to Cyrus why he should believe the story Isaiah is telling him. Since God has no higher arthority to appeal to He appeals to Himself. In the process He makes the statement He did not create the earth vain but to be inhabited.
That is a declarative statment made by God to Isaiah. Isaiah is the one who has to convince Cyrus.
Peg writes:
Yep i see what you are saying and i disagree with you.
So why don't you start at verse 4 and refute what I say.
You have already agreed that the heaven and earth existed in Genesis 1:1.
So why not explain the history of the day the Lord God created the heaven and the earth.
But you are free to disagree.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 7:09 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 10:22 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 124 of 607 (561838)
05-23-2010 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Peg
05-23-2010 7:27 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
If he did make vs 5 the beginning of Chpt 2, do you think you could read it in the same way as you are doing now? And do you really think that the translator who made the numbering system actually had any better idea of how the account should be understood then anyone else?
I don't care if it was in the book of Exodus the words written in Genesis 2:4 would be refering to Genesis 1:1 along with the following verses.
But 2:5 does not claim to be the beginning of the history of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Genesis 2:4 does make the claim it is the beginning of the history of the day God created the heaven and the earth in the day God created the heaven and the earth.
And yes I know that the writings of Moses did not have verses and chapters as that did not happen until just a few hundred years ago.
Moses would have written on clay tablets as that is what the children of Israel was proficient in making.
That means it would have been easy to mix them up and get verses in the wrong place.
I say Genesis 2:4 should follow Genesis 1:1 as it claims to be the history of what happened in the light period God created the heaven and the earth.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 7:27 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 10:29 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 130 by purpledawn, posted 05-24-2010 9:44 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 127 of 607 (561871)
05-24-2010 2:00 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by Peg
05-23-2010 10:29 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
So according to reading it this way, there was no primitive planet, no animals, no seas....but there was land with no man to cultivate the ground, so God plants a garden and makes a man and woman and then along comes a snake (keep in mind that no animals are mentioned when you read the text this way)
If you stop at verse 9 as you did you don't even have woman existing. Woman does not exist until after all the creatures are formed from the ground, and named by the man.
This is the way it would read in the KJV Bible which I am affirming:
1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
2:11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
2:12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
2:13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
2:14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.
The heaven and earth are created in 1:1
The history of the heaven and the earth begin in what is listed as 2:4.
There was no plants, or herbs before they grew it had not rained and there was no one to till the ground. 2:5
There was a mist that watered the ground from beneath. 2:6
We have man formed from the dust of the ground in 2:7.
God planted a garden 2:8.
God made every tree tht is pleasnt to the sight and good for food to grow out of the ground. 2:9
A river went out of Eden and divided into four to water the land. 2:10
2:11-2:14 is information about the rivers.
God put the man in the garden to dress it. 2:15
2:16-17 God tells the man he can eat fruit of all the trees but one. He is told he will die the day he eats fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good nd evil.
2:18 God said He would make a help meet for man as it was not good for him to be alone.
2:19, 20 God then formed every beast of the field and every fowl of the air out of the ground. He then took them to the man to see what he would call them.
2:21 God took a rib from the man after He made him fall asleep.
2:22 From that rib God made a woman.
The man said the things in 2:24, 25.
Then you bring the snake into chapter 2 when he don't belong there.
Then you leave out the formation of all creatures and fowl and say they don't exist.
I call that selective reading. You know reading what you want to read instead of what I am affirming.
At the very best you are being intelectualy dishonest.
At worst you are being deceitful just to try to prove your point and not address the real issues.
Peg writes:
All you are doing is complicating a perfectly fine and logical account of creation that God has provided us with.
Now who is complicating a perfectly fine and logical account of creation that God has provided.
Which BTW does not conflict with science, like the one you insist on believing in does.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 10:29 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Peg, posted 05-24-2010 4:21 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 131 of 607 (561950)
05-24-2010 5:22 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by Peg
05-23-2010 10:22 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
he is also a 'God of order' who does things in an orderly fashion as the account in genesis chpt 1 shows. If it all happened at once, why does Genesis 1 state that various stages happend on different days?
day 1 'let there be light'
day 2 'Let a dividing occur between the waters and the waters.'
day 3 'Let dry land & vegetation appear'
day 4 'Let the sources of light be visible in the expanse'
dat 5 'Let water creatures & flying creatures swarm forth'
day 6 'Let land animals and mankind appear'
How could this all happen in 1 day, if the account shows it happened over 6 days?
But all of the things listed above did take place beginning with the evening found in Genesis 1:2as it was dark, the ending of that dark period with the following morning was declared as the first day. in Genesis 1:5.
You do realize that there is light on half of the earth all the time don't you? There is also darkness on half of the earth at all times.
I have no problem with that as I believe it is a fact as stated in Genesis 1:2-27.
Peg writes:
where is this light period mentioned....and if you say vs 5, then show me the light period that came before vs 5.
Did God call a light period day?
Did God call a light period and a dark period a day?
The evening followed by the beginning of a light period was declared as the first day.
Where is the light period for day one?
The end of that light period with evening and the end of that dark period with morning was declared the second day.
Genesis 2:4 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Did whoever wrote this verse say these are the generations of the heavens and of the earth? Yes/No
Generations from: Here
1. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Biology) the act or process of bringing into being; production or reproduction, esp of offspring
Hebrew towledah generations:
1) descendants, results, proceedings, generations, genealogies
a) account of men and their descendants
1) genealogical list of one's descendants
2) one's contemporaries
3) course of history
It seems genealogies are the history of families from generation to generation. Thus it is the history of a family.
So Genesis 2:4 declares that these things are the history of the heavens and the earth in the day God created the heaven and the earth.
So whoever wrote this verse said it is the history of the day God created the heaven and the earth.
What is this day that happened in Genesis 1:1?
Peg writes:
so is the earth going to stop spinning?
No it has never stopped spinning and never will except during the process of melting with fervent heat prior to God creating a new heaven and new earth.
Peg writes:
The new heaven and earth will be in a continual 'light' only in the sense that God will be ruling the nations and the spiritual light from him will not cease.
That is not what Revelation says.
John writes:
Revelation 22:5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
God will produce all the light needed.
Does this verse say there will be no night there? Yes/No
John writes:
Revelation 21:23 And the city had no need of the sun, neither of the moon, to shine in it: for the glory of God did lighten it, and the Lamb is the light thereof.
Does this verse say there is no need of the sun or the moon because the Lamb is the light? Yes/No
Does either of these verses state anything about nations or spiritual light? Yes/No
Peg writes:
Isaiah didnt deliver that message to Cyrus...he delivered it to the Jews who were in captivity....Cyrus was not located in Babylon and Isaiah was certainly not located in Persia, the home city of Cyrus.
Isaiah writes:
45:1 Thus saith the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him; and I will loose the loins of kings, to open before him the two leaved gates; and the gates shall not be shut;
This verse declares God is speaking to an anointed Cyrus. He had set Cyrus up to do a specific job for Him.
Now whether Isaiah delivered the message or not I do not know. But I do know it was addressed to Cyrus.
Peg writes:
I've already done that and there is no point going over it again.
If you did I missed it could you point out which message you did that in.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Peg, posted 05-23-2010 10:22 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Peg, posted 05-24-2010 7:36 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 132 of 607 (561956)
05-24-2010 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Peg
05-24-2010 4:21 AM


Re: Jesus reading of Genesis holds the real affirmation.
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
Matthew 9:3-5 writes:
3 And Pharisees came up to him, intent on tempting him and saying: Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife on every sort of ground? 4 In reply he said: Did YOU not read that he who created them from [the] beginning made them male and female 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will stick to his wife, and the two will be one flesh’?
You need to correct this quote as it is Matthew 19 not 9.
Peg writes:
When he was questioned about the legality of Divorce, he showed that the man and woman who were made 'in the beginning' were Adam and Eve.
"in the beginning".
This says in the beginning not on day 6. In the beginning would be during the day the Heavens and the earth was created.
Which is attested to by the evidence you presented to prove your point. Genesis 2:24 took place during the day the heaven and the earth was created.
Peg writes:
So if your affirmation is that some other humans were created in 'the beginning', why would Jesus speak of them as if they were Adam and Eve?
But Jesus was talking about the man and woman in Genesis chapter 2 not the people in chapter 1.
Peg writes:
It would prove that the accounts in genesis chpt 2 is simply a more detailed account about Gods creation of mankind.
Genesis chapter 2 is not only a better detailed account of the bara creation of mankind but the bara creation of all creatures, fowl, and vegetation of all kinds.
Genesis 1:2-27 only covers the bara creation of water creatures and mankind in the image and likeness of God.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Peg, posted 05-24-2010 4:21 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Peg, posted 05-24-2010 7:42 PM ICANT has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 133 of 607 (561957)
05-24-2010 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by purpledawn
05-24-2010 9:44 AM


Re: Generations of the heavens and the earth.
Hi PD,
purpledawn writes:
Genesis 2:4 is not referring to Genesis 1:1. According to the Documentary Hypothesis, Genesis 2:4a was written by the Redactor. The Redactor is the one who added the "These are the generations" type lines, the genealogies, and the ages of the people.
PD I could care less what the Documentary Hypothesis says about anything. Or what a Redactor may or may not have written.
I don't care if it was written by P or J or even Joseph Smith, I am not affirming or denying anything concerning any of those statements or hypothesis's.
I am affirming what is said in the KJV Bible.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Does this verse say "In the beginning"? Yes/No
Does the verse say, "God created the heaven and the earth"? Yes/No
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Does this verse say, "These are the generations of the heavens and the earth"? Yes/No
Does this verse say those generations are, "of the Heavens and of the earth when they were created"?
Does this verse say those generations are of the heavens and the earth, "when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens"? Yes/No
Nothing matters except what is written in the KJV Bible as that is all that I am affirming in this thread.
Do you agree that the KJV Bible says what it says? Yes/No
If I have misrepresented what the KJV Bible says please show me where I did so.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by purpledawn, posted 05-24-2010 9:44 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Straggler, posted 05-24-2010 6:33 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 141 by purpledawn, posted 05-24-2010 8:40 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 134 of 607 (561958)
05-24-2010 6:21 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Straggler
05-24-2010 8:25 AM


Re: What Would You Consider A Valid Refutation?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
Well you could start by looking at the over-arching similarities rather than the relatively minor differences?
The man in Genesis 2:7 was formed from the dust of the ground before any other creatures or plants of any kind.
The woman in Genesis 2:22 was created from the rib of the man after all creatures were formed from the ground and plants were created without seed.
These people were placed in a garden and forbidden to eat the fruit of one tree in the garden.
The man and the woman in Genesis 1:27 were created in the image of God after all other creatures were called forth from the ground after their kind and plants of every kind were produced from the seed in the ground. They were not placed in a garden and they were never forbidden to eat fruit from any tree.
Could you please point out the similarities in these two events.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Straggler, posted 05-24-2010 8:25 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by Straggler, posted 05-24-2010 6:54 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 139 of 607 (561963)
05-24-2010 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by Straggler
05-24-2010 6:33 PM


Re: Two Charles Darwins?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
In 1859 a book called "On The Origin of Species" was published by one Charles Darwin. In 1872 a book called "The Origin of Species" was published. Also by someone called Charles Darwin. Despite the many seeming similarities between these works it is my affirmation that there were two Charles Darwins who each wrote different books.
What relavance does this post have to this thread?
If you want to discuss your topic start a thread and I will discuss it with you.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Straggler, posted 05-24-2010 6:33 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Straggler, posted 05-25-2010 5:26 AM ICANT has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024