Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ground Zero Mosque - Tolerance, Racism or Comedy?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 39 of 200 (583235)
09-25-2010 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
09-23-2010 11:50 AM


I like the sound of waves crashing
So is this a genuine and worthwhile dig at intolerance?
If it's not a sarcasm-based joke, it's pretty good work for a bigot. And who said bigots can't be funny? Oh, I know who...
Anyway, I think it's a dig at intolerance, it seems too well thought out and humorous to be actual hate. It's definitely at the expense of Muslims though, just as every other joke is at the expense of someone or some group. But that's where the funny lies.
I mean c'mon, "You Mecca Me So Hot"...? That's comedy gold. So is "Turban Cowboy."
In fact, even if it's based on hate, it's funny nonetheless.
The best comedy comes from some truth. SNL did a sketch after the towers got hit about local businesses that had "Osama Bin Laden" sounding names feeling the financial stress after 9/11. This one strikes me as having a similar tone.
I forget the names of the businesses that SNL came up with but they were funny.
And besides, who wants total tolerance? Nothing would ever be funny then, there would be no funny stereotypes or mocking a group for the dumb shit they do.
Look, China Town smells like shit because the "Chinese people" there sell fish on the sidewalk. And I say "chinese" 'cause they all look chinese. Solly, that's just what it is.
Sometimes a gay guys acts silly wearing combat boots and daisy dukes, that shit is hilarious, and real. Just head to The Village or Santa Monica Blvd in the west coast. SSSSSssssorry, that's just what it is.
If tolerance means having to avoid this sort of humor, or the one in the e-mail, then fuck it, I'll enjoy intolerance. Sounds like more fun.
Does it make any worthwhile points? I think the point is that it's funny to deliberately offend people.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 09-23-2010 11:50 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by frako, posted 09-25-2010 5:01 PM onifre has seen this message but not replied
 Message 44 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2010 8:18 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 45 of 200 (583268)
09-25-2010 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Straggler
09-25-2010 8:18 PM


Re: I like the sound of waves crashing
I am deeply offended by your stance on offending people.
Shove it, limey.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2010 8:18 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Straggler, posted 09-29-2010 3:58 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 46 of 200 (583270)
09-25-2010 8:33 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Straggler
09-25-2010 8:17 PM


Re: Tolerance
And let's be honets) I am trying to stir things up between Rrhain and Oni by starting a thread on Mosques, Moslems bigotry and comedy all in one convenient location.
It's the perfect storm!
Either way, I didn't hear no bell. Fights still on as far as I'm concerned. Its all for F,un A,nd G,ames anyway.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Straggler, posted 09-25-2010 8:17 PM Straggler has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 87 of 200 (584245)
10-01-2010 12:01 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by Straggler
09-29-2010 3:58 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
Now I don't care how good your material is. I don't give a fuck how funny the audience thinks this is. You have crossed a line. And frankly deserve a kicking for it.
Crossed what line? From nice to mean?
If the audience laughed though, they did their job. Kick their ass if you like, but now you crossed a line.
Because there is a degree of targetting, victimisation and abuse (as per the extreme scenario above) that surely anyone would consider to have "crossed the line".
What line? All you're scenario tells me is that the person writing material like that, although they may find it funny, is a dick in my opinion.
People are dicks sometimes, what are you gonna do?
What I mean when I say "there is no line" is that there is no topic that one couldn't try to make funny. I've heard funny jokes about pretty much every subject - AIDS, rape, pedophilia, cancer, handicaps, dead troops, genocide (and a host of others). The only thing is, you risk coming off like a completely insensitive asshole if it doesn't work, but it can work.
So as long as someone is trying to be funny, which is what "doing comedy" is, I don't consider any subject off limits. There is no line that I draw. Nothing that you wrote seemed like comedy to me, it was just someone being an asshole.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Straggler, posted 09-29-2010 3:58 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by frako, posted 10-01-2010 7:20 AM onifre has seen this message but not replied
 Message 89 by ringo, posted 10-01-2010 12:40 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 90 by Omnivorous, posted 10-01-2010 1:00 PM onifre has replied
 Message 91 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2010 1:55 PM onifre has replied
 Message 96 by Straggler, posted 10-01-2010 6:51 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 92 of 200 (584381)
10-01-2010 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Dr Adequate
10-01-2010 1:55 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
We're discussing when people should be considered dicks.
Whenever you like. I think people are dicks about 95% of the time. There is no limit, no minimum, no test, really; it's up to you when you feel someone is being a dick. But there is no universal guage that we will all agree on that's for sure.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-01-2010 1:55 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Tram law, posted 10-01-2010 3:58 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 93 of 200 (584392)
10-01-2010 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Omnivorous
10-01-2010 1:00 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
I looked around at my sobbing mother, my solemn father, my appalled siblings trying not to gag at the smell of burnt flesh, and said, "I suppose you wonder why I called you all here."
What a great line! I hope you're ok though, sounds like a fucked up situation to be in.
Later, when the black nurse came to change my sheets
I think this humorous lady has since started driving limos at funerals.
I was at a friend's apt in NY when he got the news that his father had passed away; we were headed with a few other comics to theUniversity of Conn. for a show.
We all stood there in silence for a minute, then out of nowhere my friend says, "Leave it to my dad to ruin my plans to get some college pussy," and we all laughed hysterically and changed the mood of the situation.
What someone will find funny is completely subjective.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Omnivorous, posted 10-01-2010 1:00 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Omnivorous, posted 10-01-2010 8:38 PM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 110 of 200 (584550)
10-02-2010 3:24 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by Tram law
10-01-2010 3:58 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
What's the insentive to being good?
Most of the time, it's when I know I'm doing something bad that there is usually an insentive.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Tram law, posted 10-01-2010 3:58 PM Tram law has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Tram law, posted 10-02-2010 3:51 PM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 112 of 200 (584656)
10-03-2010 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by Straggler
10-01-2010 6:51 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
Dude the "the there is no line" argument is just false.
No it is not, when used properly. You are not using it the way it is meant to be used. I explained that when I or a comic in general, uses the phrase "there is no line," he's talking about a topic. There is no subject or topic that is too taboo not to joke about - there is no line.
That's how it's meant.
If enough people found it funny would torture on stage be acceptable?
Have you ever watched Kathy Griffen on stage?
I cannot conceive that you think it would. That is a line. A pretty low level line. But a line nevertheless.
Yes, torture is wrong. Putting it on stage to glorify it is even worse. Murder is also a line, we have laws for it too.
But none of that is comedy, so I don't see your point.
But if the audeince found it funny you think he has done his job? Or was he just bullying?
We'd have to see the example of it before making a judgment on it.
I get what you're trying to say but you have to recognize the fact that you are using the term wrong. "There is no line" is not meant to justify torture or murder on stage if someone or a group happens to find sick shit like that funny. It's just meant to reflect one's opinion on different subjects and topics and remove their taboo label.
Don't go so overboard with it.
But seriously though, Kathy Griffen is legal torture on TV.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Straggler, posted 10-01-2010 6:51 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Straggler, posted 10-04-2010 7:32 PM onifre has replied
 Message 115 by Tram law, posted 10-04-2010 7:46 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 118 of 200 (584988)
10-04-2010 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Straggler
10-04-2010 7:32 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
Are you saying it isn't completely defined by what the audience finds funny?
It's decided by the performer. An audience can find it funny but that doesn't matter. You can laugh at tragedy, that doesn't change the tragic play or dramatic movie to a comedy all of a sudden. Maybe the person is stupid or retarded and laugh at anything, does that make everything comedy?
And this is also by consensus too. Just 'cause one sick fuck thinks torture or murder are forms of comedy, that doesn't make them so.
They are examples of targetting. When does targetting individuals or groups become bullying rather than comedy? Regardless of topic. Regardless of how funny it may be to others. That is the question.
When it is bullying, duh? lol
It's done the same way as we do it at work, or in a bar, or where ever people are social. Things stop being funny when people stop laughing.
But you are confusing what is considered "in the genre of comedy" and what is considered "funny." One doesn't define the other.
But others might decide that their comedic freedoms are infringed if they are banned from certain activities in the name of decency or whatever.
Well sorry "others" but murder and/or torture just aren't a popular form of comedy right now. They can want it to be comedy all they want, but if it isn't what is normally performed as comedy, it isn't comedy.
You can want, or even believe wholeheartedly, that The Godfather is a comedy, but why should that change it?
What principles are you applying in defining your line? That is my question here.
The same one's we all apply.
Because it is frankly silly to say that "there is no line" unless literally anything goes.
But I don't say there is no line as in literally anything goes, I've explained how I use it. But there literally is no line as to what can be funny. And what is considered "in the genre of comedy" is decided by the piece, or the words used, or the actions taken - as it would be in any other situation.
I am starting to sound like Rrhain.....
Not yet...
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Straggler, posted 10-04-2010 7:32 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2010 6:22 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 119 of 200 (584990)
10-04-2010 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Tram law
10-04-2010 7:46 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
If you've ever seen the Pink Panther movies with Peter Sellers then you'd see how wrong that statement is.
Or the Naked Gun movies for that matter.
Or Hot Shots.
I've seen them many times, but I don't remember the scene in any of those movies where someone actually, for really, no bullshit gets tortured or murdered.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Tram law, posted 10-04-2010 7:46 PM Tram law has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by jar, posted 10-04-2010 10:59 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 137 by Tram law, posted 10-06-2010 1:02 PM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 124 of 200 (585050)
10-05-2010 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by Straggler
10-05-2010 6:22 AM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
You seem to be saying that there are some things which are too sick to be considered comedy no matter how many people find them funny whilst also maintaining your "there is no line" mantra.
I have explained how I'm using the "there is no line" mantra, it does not in anyway leave a window open for torture and murder to sneak in under the guise of comedy.
YOU are forcing it in with YOUR take on what it means.
Well how many people have to find it funny for it to be considered "comedy" if a performer decides to do that in the name of laughs?
Wasn't torture and capital punishment once done in public to the amusement of a crowd? I'd say revert back to the dark ages, back to when the Bible was taken literally - that seems to breed insanity.
What about ripping the clothes off a hugely fat person against their will for laughs?
Against their will? That is not comedy, that is rape, we've already defined it and created laws to punish those who commit it. Seriously Straggler this seems rather comical in it's own right.
If the performer does that and the audience find a naked fatty being humiliated on stage frikkin hilarious is that comedy?
I've clearly stated in the last post that finding something funny doesn't make it comedy. You could just be a sick fuck, or retarded and find everything funny, or just plain stupid and laugh at tragedy. Just because a crowd laughs doesn't make what is being done "comedy."
I would defend the right of comics to tell jokes about rape regardless of who might be randomly offended by that. But that is not the same (for example) as finding out that a particular member of the audience has been raped and then ripping the piss out of that individual and their experiences in public in the name of cutting edge comedy.
Do you see the difference?
Do I see the difference? Yes of course...and did you see how easy it was to tell the difference between comedy and bullying?
Who decides when that is?
The people you're performing to, or in the real world, the people you are telling your joke to. It's no different than any other situation.
And yet we all have different ideas as to what is acceptable and what is not. So it cannot be as simple as you are making out.
I think you're making it purposely harder than it really is.
I think you'll find we can all agree on what is considered "in the genre of comedy" and what is not. The difference of course is in what individual people find FUNNY, and that is where you're getting stuck. What someone finds funny doesn't automatically make it comedy, like I said, you could find The Godfather hilarious but that doesn't make The Godfather a comedy.
Everyone will find different things funny, but we can all agree on what is in the genre of comedy and what is, say, a drama or a thriller or a suspense or a horror. We've already done that. So even if you publicly murder someone to the rip-roaring laughter of a crowd, doesn't automatically make what you're doing "comedy" - it is murder - and I don't think you'll find anyone that will disagree. And even if you do, say, find one or two people that think it's a comedy, if the consensus amoung the rest of society is that it is not, then the opinion of one or two people doesn't mean shit.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2010 6:22 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2010 4:04 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 131 of 200 (585073)
10-05-2010 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Straggler
10-05-2010 4:04 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
So as long as the performer intends it to be comedy and the vast majority find it funny and consider it comedy — It is comedy regardless of any other moral considerations?
Suspiciously... I'd say, yes. But the "moral consideration" part is leaving me a bit uneasy with my reply. If the vast majority of people can find something funny that was intended as comedy, what kind of moral considerations weren't already taking into account before laughing?
If it is so frikkin easy and obvious why is there any debate at all as to whether certain jokes are acts of comedy or acts of bullying? Why are jokes such as the one in the OP even remotely contentious if what you say is true?
Because someone will always complain about something...no matter what it may be - people have turned into quite the cunt these days when it comes to humor.
Also, there really is no debate IN COMEDY about what comedy is, the debate is had outside when non-experienced people without a broad sense of humor or knowledge in the field think they can weigh in on an issue - like the twat giving her opinion about the O&A bit. But you would NEVER catch comics doing that shit, arguing about the finer points of what bullying is and isn't - we just know. And those who don't know get weeded out - where's Andrew Dice Clay these days?
They consider these jokes acts of bullying rather than comedy for exactly the same reasons that you consider singling out a rape victim in an audience as the target of comedic wit to be bullying rather than legitimate comedy.
Yup. Some people like to eat pears and I can't fucking stand them. We're all different I guess.
My point is that although you may disagree with people who object to such jokes you are not as radically different in principle as you seem to assume you are. You simply draw the line between comedy and bullying in a different place to them. But you still draw your own subjective line between acceptable comedy and unacceptable bullying
I never thought they were, I think we all share the same ability, for the most part, to signal out comedy and bullying - there wouldn't exist a law against bullying if we couldn't. There will be some grey areas, but that is expected. I don't know where I said different or lead you to think I was of a different opinion.
The issue comes in when we seek retribution, this is where I take issue. This is when it can get ugly in the discussion, as you've seen here in the past. But that is expected too.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Straggler, posted 10-05-2010 4:04 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Omnivorous, posted 10-05-2010 8:05 PM onifre has replied
 Message 138 by Straggler, posted 10-06-2010 2:42 PM onifre has replied
 Message 144 by New Cat's Eye, posted 10-07-2010 2:15 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 132 of 200 (585076)
10-05-2010 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by jar
10-05-2010 4:59 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
But would serving Calamari rings in tomato bisque after the Bris be considered as crossing a line?
It took me a minute but I got it.
Quite the faux pas I think.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by jar, posted 10-05-2010 4:59 PM jar has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 134 of 200 (585113)
10-05-2010 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by Omnivorous
10-05-2010 8:05 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
The only lines were white, chopped, and not long on the table.
Niceee. I think these are usually the lines draw by the comics I know too.
Ah, those were the days, my friend Ever play that kind of venue?
Never anything that rough, that place sounds like it needs a bouncer by the name of, Dalton (anyone catch the reference?) It does sound like those were fun times though.
I do perform at a few rough rooms, out of the way bars mainly, but never with a fence separating me. The worse was early on when I started, a place in Ft. Myers, Florida, realllly out of the way from anything - one of those places were nothing is around for miles except that bar and one street light. But I was hungry and would take anything.
Anyway, about halfway into my set, which was about 7 minutes in, a giant redneck, mullet wearing, 3 tooth'd motherfucker stands up, points at my face (and the audience wasn't far from the stage so the tip of his finger was about 5' away from me) and says, "I don't like you, man. You suck something bad, and I think everyone here thinks you suck too. Ima let you finish, but just know that you ain't that good."
So I paused for a few, looked at the rest of the crowd and said, "Well, I guess we've heard from the town's English professor, anyone else want to chime in and tell me how good I ain't?" And the place errupted in laughter. The best part was the "professor" didn't get it, he just stood there wondering why everyone was laughing. He never said anything else but I truly was scared for the rest of the set. Me and the other comics didn't stay long after the show either.
I've heard some real horror stories about the road.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Omnivorous, posted 10-05-2010 8:05 PM Omnivorous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 135 by Theodoric, posted 10-05-2010 9:14 PM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2981 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 142 of 200 (585320)
10-07-2010 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by Straggler
10-06-2010 2:42 PM


Re: Targetting "The Line"
And we wouldn’t have people advocating censorship of certain jokes or extensions to such laws if bullying were able to be so clearly defined and easy for us all to agree upon.
Well you can't expect everyone to agree. But for the most part, it's not an everyday situation. Something said is always gonna bother somebody, and in every case, there is a group defending the person/s being accused. This is inevitable.
But anyway I thought you were against some of these laws? Things like hate laws. No?
I'm against "hate" laws for the fact that it doesn't protect anyone group anymore than just calling it a crime does. It is used as a tool by politicians and community leaders to circumvent having to actually deal with the issues causing the tention. And, because in some cases, labeling it "hate" actually increases the potential for more violence.
But not because it mislabels bullying.
But we don’t all draw these lines in the same places. They are necessarily subjective.
Agreed.
So when you are next confronted with someone objecting to a joke because they deem it to be an act of unacceptable targeted bullying against gays, blacks, Jews, Moslems, women or whoever - When they suggest that some line has been crossed by such jokes — I don’t think you can legitimately dismiss them with your there is no line argument.
I did no such thing, you can retrace my argument in that thread. My point was/is, protest all you want, call it what ever your subjective interpretation tells you it is, but don't expect your reaction to have the repercussion that only you desire when there are people disagreeing with you.
This is when you as a listener need to shut off or not attend the questionable show. If you don't like it, don't listen to it. But when there are adults who enjoy it and no laws are being broken, your opinion while worth something to you isn't going to have much of an impact - which is the way it should be.
Do they? By whose definition of bullying?
I would say it's common knowledge for the most part when you are a student of comedy. But with that said, failure to adhere to that is almost guaranteed, especially when one is trying to stand out and separate from the herd. However, that's when the audience comes in and judges it for themselves - and that is how the shitty comic is weeded out.
And why would they get weeded out if the majority find that particular brand of bullying incredibly funny?
I've never seen a majority of audience members (Unless you are attending the KKK's weekly open mic) enjoy out-right bullying and targetting of someone like in your hypothetical example. Never ever.
Can you give a different example or is this just hypothetical?
Is the line between comedy and bullying just a majority rule situation as far as you are concerned?
I guess - but isn't that the way we all judge it?
I've seen crazy situations, where a comic just bashed one dude to the point of making me uncomfortable for the poor dude, and yet after the show the person loved being the center of ridicule (nothing as bad as your example though). In my opinion though, the comic shouldn't have gone after the guy so harshly, but who am I to impose my opinion and demand things done my way?
Do you think it never occurs that a majority find the immoral bullying of a targeted minority highly amusing? Is this just something we don’t need to even consider in your view?
If you could give me a legit example I might consider it an issue but I've never seen it done to such an extreme, and I'm in clubs and bars almost every night.
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by Straggler, posted 10-06-2010 2:42 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Straggler, posted 10-07-2010 2:28 PM onifre has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024