Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jazzns' History of Belief
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 35 of 140 (636926)
10-12-2011 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Phat
10-12-2011 7:15 AM


Re: Give Us A Break
Personally, even as a believer, I am unafraid of such a concept.
Doesn't this defeat the purpose? Seems that there is no propose to hell if it isn't something to be feared and avoided.
I have to respect the literalists more than this new age woo stuff. At least the literalists actually believe in something.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Phat, posted 10-12-2011 7:15 AM Phat has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9199
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 51 of 140 (637154)
10-13-2011 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by GDR
10-13-2011 8:56 PM


Survival of the fittest explained
Well Darwin used it
Really, basic research is not that difficult. All you have to do is look at Wikipedia. If you don't believe them then follow the footnotes to the sources.
quote:
Herbert Spencer first used the phrase — after reading Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species — in his Principles of Biology (1864), in which he drew parallels between his own economic theories and Darwin's biological ones, writing, "This survival of the fittest, which I have here sought to express in mechanical terms, is that which Mr. Darwin has called 'natural selection', or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life."[1]
Darwin first used Spencer's new phrase "survival of the fittest" as a synonym for natural selection in the fifth edition of On the Origin of Species, published in 1869.[2][3] Darwin meant it as a metaphor for "better adapted for immediate, local environment", not the common inference of "in the best physical shape".[4] Hence, it is not a scientific description
Source
I know that a number of the posters here pooh pooh the use of sources and evidence, but it isn't really that hard.

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by GDR, posted 10-13-2011 8:56 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by GDR, posted 10-13-2011 9:43 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024