Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   This just in, Wisconsin Senators Pass Bill Pushing Abstinence Over Contraception
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(5)
Message 82 of 117 (640170)
11-07-2011 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Modulous
11-07-2011 6:14 PM


Re: Serious question
There are some people that believe that a lifetime relationship should not be dependent on sexual prowess.
And those people are called "friends."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Modulous, posted 11-07-2011 6:14 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 96 of 117 (640508)
11-10-2011 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Coyote
11-09-2011 11:16 PM


Re: Truth (corrected)
On the other hand, what I have seen around a lot of colleges is a plethora of "victims" who claim to want "social justice."
Oh, so yesterday the line was that OWS protestors and their college-age sympathizers were rich hypocrites, born with a silver spoon in their mouths but with the temerity to ignore their noblesse oblige to, I dunno, vote for self-serving tax cuts.
Today the line is that they're all self-described "victims" out to seek self-serving "social justice", which, I guess, means redistributive tax hikes on the rich and greater social program spending. So yesterday it was hypocrisy for young liberals to be anything but self-serving, and today it's a moral outrage that they're so self-serving. This is reminiscent of conservative complaints that President Obama is somehow simultaneously a Chicago insider and a Kenyan outsider.
I wish you morons could get your attacks straight. Don't you get whiplash from pivoting on a dime so often?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Coyote, posted 11-09-2011 11:16 PM Coyote has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 99 of 117 (640685)
11-11-2011 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by Omnivorous
11-11-2011 6:37 PM


Re: Truth
Oh, are you guys vets?
Thanks - not for "defending my freedom", which unless you're 80 years old you have not ever done, but for paying the price of our mistaken policies. We owed you better than that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by Omnivorous, posted 11-11-2011 6:37 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 6:55 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 101 by Omnivorous, posted 11-11-2011 7:03 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 111 by dwise1, posted 11-12-2011 2:52 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(3)
Message 102 of 117 (640688)
11-11-2011 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by NoNukes
11-11-2011 6:55 PM


Re: Truth
I find that a pretty ungracious, and demonstrably false Veterans' day sentiment.
You're completely wrong. What is ungracious is to send young men and women to die in countries with no capacity to attack us or "threaten my freedoms" and then act like they're engaged in some great noble defense of freedom so politicians can profit from a state of war.
That's bullshit. The last war that represented even the hint of risk to the freedoms of American citizens by foreign malefactors was WWII. Every subsequent war has been in the service of treaty obligations or the economic interests of moneyed elites, and if you ask just about any vet they'll agree. I've talked to many. Plenty of men and women sacrificed much in Korea, the Gulf, Iraq, Afghanistan, and other godforsaken, benighted places that posed no conceivable threat to Americans at home, and I honor and recognize that sacrifice.
But not because I benefited in any way from it. Rather, because I did not do enough as an American citizen to prevent my leaders from putting them in the position of having to sacrifice much for literally absolutely nothing. My best friend died in Iraq about seven years ago, and I'll never stop being ashamed that it was for absolutely fucking nothing. God help me, I was even in favor of invading Iraq. What an utter absolute idiot I was. We all were, and are. And that's what we owe our vets today - our gravest apologies for what we've done to them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 6:55 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 8:01 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 103 of 117 (640689)
11-11-2011 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Omnivorous
11-11-2011 7:03 PM


Re: Truth
And I'm sorry. A better people would not have put you in that position.
Truly, truly sorry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Omnivorous, posted 11-11-2011 7:03 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by Omnivorous, posted 11-11-2011 9:42 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 106 of 117 (640698)
11-11-2011 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by NoNukes
11-11-2011 8:01 PM


Re: Truth
If it wasn't clear, let me say that we can thank our veterans and service men for sacrifices that have nothing to do with fighting in wars. I'm quite sure I made that point in my message.
I guess what I was confused by is that "veteran" means "somebody who fought in a war". Certainly our servicemen and women have contributed and continue to contribute much to America, and I hope I didn't give you the impression that I didn't believe that. My wife serves in AMEDD as an entomologist (she's working on malaria right now) so I'm certainly mindful of the vast contributions and accomplishments of service personnel.
Your post is a complete straw man.
I disagree, since the context here is Veteran's Day, not Armed Forces Day. I'm sorry if I somehow gave you the wrong impression about what I was talking about, but surely a glance at a calendar might have addressed your confusion.
Your suggestion that no service man had ever done anything to defend your freedom since WWII is completely off base.
You've misunderstood. My position is that no American war has done anything to defend the freedom of Americans since WWII, and that's abundantly true.
Edited by crashfrog, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 8:01 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 11:14 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(1)
Message 110 of 117 (640708)
11-12-2011 1:50 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by NoNukes
11-11-2011 11:14 PM


Re: Truth
We're maybe talking past each other. Let me just say that it was not ever my intention to slight servicemen and women, but rather to slight the leadership that so frequently plays a shell game with their lives and livelihoods.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by NoNukes, posted 11-11-2011 11:14 PM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024