I have given many examples of how creationists interpret the evidence differently and why
You've offered a few sketchy claims about different interpretations of a few facts, but far from sufficient detail and not a single attempt at
why or how the explanation addresses
all the data as well or better than the mainstream explanation.
Ya see, it's all an interconnected web. One thing leads to another. I know you want to look at individual facts in isolation 'cause the big picture is death for your claims, but that ain't science. Do you interpret the geological column as showing that the Earth is young? Then you need an explanation for
why the many wildly different and independent methods of dating the Earth and rocks
agree that the Earth is old
and exactly how old it is.
1 And if you want to claim that those dating methods are wrong, you need an explanation for
why they agree essentially all of the time, and
why the most fundamental principles of physics and chemistry (which predict unambiguously that the dates are correct) don't apply in this case. And if the most fundamental principles of physics and chemistry don't apply in this case, the
why do they apply so well to all the other cases we have investigated?
And then you need to explain, in detail, how the geological column came to be in such a short time. Not "da fludde did it". In
detail. That gets you into paleosols and aeolian deposits and metamorphosis and pretty soon back into basic and physics and chemnistry.
It just goes on and on and on and on ... everything connects to everything ... if the Earth is young, your computer cannot possibly work.
The best and brightest of the YEC "scientists" have labored hard, and brought forth ...
"It's a miracle!" (paraphrased).
Of course, when the only explanation if a miracle, that ain't science.
----------------------
1Examples of a few
2 problematic dates, sepecially those obtained by "creation scientists" by outright and acknowledged fraus, don't count. Examples on request.
2In the context of hundreds of thousands if not millions of concordant dates, a few hundred or a few thousand is "few".