Logical Proof of Existence of a Divine Creator, Why Atheism is Not Logically Sound

We have no choice. We all get to heaven and if you apply the idea to a God then it just shows what all perfect Gods should do. Never loses a soul.Most believe that God has a heaven for good souls and a hell for evil ones. All souls are created perfect and are destined for reward.God does not do oops while creating.Regards
DL

Have I not done that here?I did say there was no proof.Regards
DL

Thanks for the advise but "In reality, all you have is speculation."
does not apply. Speculation is built on imagination. I am aware of when I use my imagination. I am aware when I do not. A specific event prompted my thinking. Not a self created scenario.What kind of fool would say that he spoke to God and the message is think demographically. If I were to use even a small amount of imagination I hope I could come up with a better word of wisdom than that. On the surface the message is meaningless. Only looking at it in depth dose one gleam why I and others should think this way. Try it to see if it is a wise thing to do. If yes then the message is plausible. If not, from my point of view, it falls on death ears.If so then you will have to look elsewhere for wisdom.This I cannot control. All I can control is what I say and try to speak the truth in what my views are.Regards
DL

If I were just expressing imaginary thoughts or outright lying then one would wonder as to what is motivating this untruth.There is no profit in the type of discussion that my claims make. I have nothing to gain by my position other than ridicule.Why would any one open themselves to ridicule. I can think of no reason, other than just fun. I find no fun in not being believed.Regards
DL

Jesus wanted to upgrade the thinking of His time.It is true that I too want to do the same.As to converting others, when we reach heaven God does not care which God we follow as long as our hearts are good. Whatever that means to each of us.None are refused regardless of our moral condition at death.I can only do what I think my duty to God and my fellow man dictates.I can only express my God's ideas of morality. If they are the same for the reader then I do not care what he call his God. It is the philosophy that is important, not the name of God.If one must lie to express his God then I would think that their God is weird. Like fundamentals who believe in talking snakes. If it takes such to express their God then those intelligent enough to reject this impossibility are right in looking elsewhere for God.Regards
DL

" Some people do it so often they are said to be "lying for jesus", apparently honestly is not an important quality."To me it is an imperative.I have a bad memory and would get caught if I lied. This, if nothing else keeps me straight.Regards
DL

If we are meat to God then He should keep out of our affairs.
If He wants to be relevant to us then He must speak our language to e understood.If not then He is as irrelevant to man as we are irrelevant to ants.To my knowledge Man is the only one who can recognize the notion of God.
It is not God's fault if we have grossly overblown what He is.The first God was a man and the last should be as well. He speaks human.Regards
DL

Good. I like agreement.God does not eat by the way.Do you expect that when God, you will use miracles.It is my view that if God has them and does not use them then He is acting in an immoral way by letting His children starve to death.Would I be right?Regards
DL

Old prophets were venerated and wrote scripture. New prophets are at best insane. Good view. Not.Regards
DL