Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Inerrancy of the Bible 2
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4022 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 12 of 118 (179453)
01-21-2005 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Brian
01-21-2005 6:45 PM


Hi, Brian, I hope you threw in the 'chariot wheels' clincher.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Brian, posted 01-21-2005 6:45 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Brian, posted 01-22-2005 5:48 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4022 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 50 of 118 (179752)
01-22-2005 6:35 PM


Where`s Incognito? I want to hit him with more trivia.

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by lfen, posted 01-22-2005 8:19 PM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4022 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 58 of 118 (179828)
01-23-2005 1:33 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by Incognito
01-23-2005 12:34 AM


Re: I guess I gotta pick up for Tom
1) Brian, please don't quote authors who aren't mathematicians... 70 people would only produce about 10,000 in 400 years? Is this guy serious? His roughly 10% growth rate would indicate a doubling period of 7 years under the Rule of 70 for exponential growth... But this involves people, not money, so let's be conservative and assume the original 70 people could only make 35 couples most... If each couple waited an average of 20 years to have kids and each couple averaged a 4 kid survival rate. You'd be looking at a population over 10,000,000 (not 10,000) in less then 400 years...
The other problem your author runs into is the fact that the Sinai, as I mentioned previously, was not always a sandy wasteland paradise. Applying today's population assumptions to it is flat wrong (for example, Egypt didn't have 5.5 million land mines in the Sinai back during Exodus)
A better error would be how 3,000,000 people got lost for 40 years
Let`s talk exponential growth. If we take it that the 3,000,000 survived to some extent in the Sinai, what numbers are we talking about after another 400 years? and the next 400? And the next?
fixed a quote tag - The Queen
This message has been edited by AdminAsgara, 01-23-2005 10:06 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Incognito, posted 01-23-2005 12:34 AM Incognito has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4022 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 118 of 118 (181916)
01-30-2005 7:11 PM


And then of course there`s the classic 'Alleged Discrepancies of the Bible'-Haley. See how many 'alleged 'errors, are put down to 'scribal error'.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024