Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where are all the missing links?
CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 2 of 302 (231247)
08-09-2005 7:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by iano
08-09-2005 7:19 AM


Pseudo-moderator mode
quote:
I wasn't looking to get into serious debate about this but had a question about Evolution. I hope the 'Coffee Shop' is the appropriate place to pose it.
I don't see the point of having this debate outside the science forums, it just gives people a licence not to back up their claims - in fact the whole thing looks like an endrun.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iano, posted 08-09-2005 7:19 AM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by AdminSylas, posted 08-09-2005 7:34 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4158 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 19 of 302 (231981)
08-10-2005 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by iano
08-10-2005 3:50 PM


Re: Missing Links / Missing Birds
quote:
A general comment to all is that I'm not here to attack evolution nor to set traps. I don't know anything about evolution except the very broadest outline and I wouldn't mind understanding a bit more of the mechanisms whereby it has become so established. So if my question seem to be doubting it, know that that's not the case. I'm neutral (although a Christian) and can, objectively, have no way of knowing either way. If a question sounds like doubting or challenging, please see it as arising from genuine enquiry.
I don't want to go as far as calling you a liar but the questions you have posed on a number of threads seem to broadly informed by creationist literature (it's like a foreign person speaking english you can detect the accent) - so I think you trying to frame the debate as a neutral seems slightly suspect to me.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 10-Aug-2005 04:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by iano, posted 08-10-2005 3:50 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by robinrohan, posted 08-10-2005 4:38 PM CK has not replied
 Message 23 by iano, posted 08-10-2005 6:15 PM CK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024