Where are all the missing links?

NosyNed
I agree with you totally. For me the fossil record is enough to convince me that evolution has taken place.
Oldest Strata contains simple single celled organism with no nucleus.
A bit younger we have a nucleus.
Precambrian simple multi-celled... where the dinosaurs or humans in there... oh wait they have not evolved yet.
Cambrian... more and more complex life forms... still no dinos or humans yet... not even a simple mammal....
Shall I go on or has my point been made? Based on that there is enough evidence for me. Not to mention genetics, radiocarbon dating and similarities between species that others have mentioned that just makes it even more convincing. But the simple fact that no human bones have been found mixed in with older strata is enough for me. Please do no give me the Great Flood sorted it all out.Some can have a complete line from common ancestor to current species and still deny evolution has taken place. Tunnel vision and a closed mind will not allow them to see what has taken place.

---

"A Dwarf on a Giants Shoulder sees the Furthest of the Two!"

What’s the 15 evidences contradicting the claim, that the museums, don't tell their visitors? In reference to your link. I am just curious to know what the IDer's/C's are saying to disprove this obvious chain.

EvopeachHere are two Links showing similarities between human and chimp brains. As others have said there transitionals alive and well today. It is on you to show us how they are not transitional.
MRI reveals similarities between the human and chimpanzee brain
http://www.sciencedaily.com/...ases/1998/01/980107104521.htmOf course you are welcomed to read them too randman.

---

"A Dwarf on a Giants Shoulder sees the Furthest of the Two!"