Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What makes you unbelieve Crash ?
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 56 of 200 (100262)
04-15-2004 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by coffee_addict
04-15-2004 4:12 PM


Re: Statistically there is.
BUT THERE ARE scientists (Gould for sure, Sagan to some extent) who DO think that that is the way science should interact into the humanities future. I'm with you, but there are other voices.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by coffee_addict, posted 04-15-2004 4:12 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 57 of 200 (100265)
04-15-2004 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by coffee_addict
04-15-2004 4:10 PM


The Bible works more often than science. Just now for instance I was being asked if I was suspect of doing something wrong as there is apparently someone suspicious in the school. This does not apply to truths in the Bible. They will be true whether I was the wanted person or not or was the dead "girl" in the corner. It works every time. Science and society does not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by coffee_addict, posted 04-15-2004 4:10 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by coffee_addict, posted 04-15-2004 4:47 PM Brad McFall has not replied
 Message 61 by 1.61803, posted 04-15-2004 5:49 PM Brad McFall has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 74 of 200 (101019)
04-19-2004 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by SRO2
04-15-2004 4:51 PM


You see "skeptic sand" in the new topic proposal just highlighted something in green that is CONTRARY to eveything I have ever said here on EvC but it will take the dicerning WRITER to read this drunk under the runk that silly putty is not a slinky it might have been. I can read the empirics of that post AS a creationist evidence. That in and of itself is why i am useful here. Alas, the topic is still to green to dead thread the head of...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by SRO2, posted 04-15-2004 4:51 PM SRO2 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by mike the wiz, posted 04-19-2004 8:01 PM Brad McFall has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024