Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Independent Historical Corroboration for Biblical Events
Quiz
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 212 (63275)
10-29-2003 7:04 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by Dr Jack
10-29-2003 6:46 AM


My question is, how authentic is that information on that link.
-Quiz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Dr Jack, posted 10-29-2003 6:46 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Dr Jack, posted 10-29-2003 7:10 AM Quiz has replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 123 of 212 (63276)
10-29-2003 7:10 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by Quiz
10-29-2003 7:04 AM


Why don't you research it and find out? You'll find pretty much the same information echo'd everywhere, you'll can also find copies of the original sources and check them yourself.
[This message has been edited by Mr Jack, 10-29-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Quiz, posted 10-29-2003 7:04 AM Quiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by Quiz, posted 10-29-2003 7:16 AM Dr Jack has replied

  
Quiz
Inactive Member


Message 124 of 212 (63278)
10-29-2003 7:16 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by Dr Jack
10-29-2003 7:10 AM


Well even if they are it does not really matter as I dont need Josephus to agree with Christ as the messiah there are other reasons.
-Quiz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by Dr Jack, posted 10-29-2003 7:10 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Dr Jack, posted 10-29-2003 7:20 AM Quiz has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 125 of 212 (63279)
10-29-2003 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 124 by Quiz
10-29-2003 7:16 AM


Please enlighten us as to these 'other reasons'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Quiz, posted 10-29-2003 7:16 AM Quiz has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 126 of 212 (63286)
10-29-2003 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Quiz
10-29-2003 6:59 AM


Instead of being insulting about it you could just have said that you were using that definition. And you could have quoted it:
"Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups."
Well the evidence I referred to certainly supports that, so macroevolution has evidence and not just claims.
And yes I think that "liar" is a good description for someone who, when caught playing word games falsely accuses his opponent of doing the same thing. So does dictionary.com.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Quiz, posted 10-29-2003 6:59 AM Quiz has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 127 of 212 (63298)
10-29-2003 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Quiz
10-29-2003 6:21 AM


Hey Quiz
How about having some of those atheist friends of yours actually come onto the forum and have them voice their own opinions rather than speak for them? It would be nice to hear intelligent people use their own words rather than voice them through a third party.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Quiz, posted 10-29-2003 6:21 AM Quiz has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 128 of 212 (63300)
10-29-2003 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by Doctor Robert
10-28-2003 4:44 PM


Re: Bible facts?
I suspect that the 'Doc' is lurking, but even if he isn't I am going to reply for the benefit of others.
Obviously if you spent more time studying instead of living indarknes (sic) of the con game that has plagued you and Christian mankind for 1,973 years you may have been able to have received this "proof" you have been seeking all your darkened life.
Your writing is very poor, but I will try to decipher it anyway. You will find that a comma or two will make your text more readable. I dread to think what the grammar of your PhD thesis was like.
Anyway, ‘studying’ what exactly would let me see the proof that you are on about, the collection of ancient myths that you happen to think are actually real? Since you have emphatically failed to provide one single referenced source other than the Bible for your assertions, then the logical conclusion is that you are under some kind of illusion that the Bible is accurate about anything.
You clearly need to widen your reading material a lot , you are caught up in a circularity that has trapped you in a web of self-delusion, which is going to push you over the edge into insanity, no joking, the signs are already there that you are a little unstable.
What has ‘plagued’ Christians for 1973 years, the failure of Jesus to do a single thing he said he would? Go moan to him, it isn’t my fault that you cannot see a con when it is staring you in the face.
Only those foolish enough to want to destroy what the spiritual Biblical accounts have shown to (sic) many and have been hidden TO (sic) many such as yourself proves the exact point that God's word is exact.
Still no sign of a comma anywhere, are you sure you are a doctor?
Let me educate you a little. The spiritual truths of the Bible cannot be proven true of false, they can only be affirmed or denied, These truths are taken as a matter of faith, and if you are intent on finding physical evidence for these claims, the I seriously doubt your commitment to God.
Some people (like yourself) are fooled into a false security of lies and misrepresentations.
Yes, I agree, but I managed to escape the Church and I am now free from all these lies and misrepresentations. I have my doubts as to whether you have the intellectual capabilities to escape your fairytale though, I wish you luck.
In fact and it is fact brian that science has not disqualified Biblical accounts but has proven them.
Another baseless assertion, you have failed to present any evidence of this, will I just take your word for it?
The last time I looked science still claims that insects have more than four legs, as for that unicorn..
Something you obviously do not comprehend.
The reason I don’t comprehend them is because it is patently untrue! You seriously need to get a hold of some decent academic books, these two-penny novels that you have been reading are sensationalist claptrap, and you think they are convincing! Is there a conspiracy theory that your website doesn’t promote?
As for comprehension, you have a cheek, you are barely literate.
The logistics of pre-escatoligical (sic) advancements (sic) has shown that not only is the Bible correct in its assertions but more accurate than any reletive (sic) prophetic or inane philosiphies (sic) produced as a result of lies and said misrepresentation.
By ‘inane’ philosophies, I take it you are talking about Platonism and Plotinus’ Neoplatonism that the entire Christian eschatological mythology is based on?
Jesus was repeating Psalms 22 while dying on the cross.
Was he singing it or just quoting it?
The thing is about people of your very limited ability and severe lack of education is that you are unable to see what is wrong with your claims. Let my educate you a little more.
You are claiming that Jesus said these words, and your source is the same text that you get your information from, this is circular reasoning. Broken down a little more, you are saying that the Bible records the fact that Jesus said these words and your source for ‘proving’ this is the Bible!
I have been teaching at high schools for about 5 years now Doc, and I am serious when I say that your level of ability is equal to that of a 12 year old. You have absolutely no enquiry skills at all, no critical skills, and your sentence structure is diabolical.
I seriously doubt that you have a PhD, unless it is one of those degree mill fakes. One thing is for certain, you really need to enlist on an ‘Introduction to the Bible’ course, you could also do with studying what history actually is, but forget archaeology, the methodologies would melt your brain, if you had one.
He quoted it in front of Roman witnesses as well as Kenite ones.
Again, this is yet another circular argument for something that you have no proof of outside of your myths.
Since it was NOT Jews that crucified Him (something you probably didn’t (sic) know),
You mean crucifixion is not a Jewish punishment, well stone me. Doc, this is Sunday school stuff, we were taught this when I was about 5 years old. The way you put this over, it sounds as if you have only recently found this out yourself!
why then would they lie?
What are you talking about, who is lying and what are they lying about?
In fact there is historical documentation both roman and jewish (sic) that do this exact thing.
Any chance that you could go wild and actually reference it, wasn’t referencing your sources a basic requirement of your ‘PhD’?
For your information they can be located in the United States Congressional Library. Something else I dare discern you do not know. The American Archaeological Institution in Washington D.C. can also help you out on these eye witness reports.
There are no eyewitness reports, unless you can name some of course. BTW, the Mitchell library has information that negates the USC Library, I won’t bother pointing it out, you can find it yourself, if you are really wanting to find it. (This was probably lost on you)
In Psalms 22 It (sic) is written 1,000 years before His birth and it is a fact whether you want to believe it or not shows you have no historical evidence your self (sic) and are in complete denial.
What is a fact, that psalms 22 was written 1000 years before Jesus was born? I am finding it difficult to follow your train of thought. But, we will go with this meaning and hope it is the correct one.
You actually do not know when any of the psalms were written, that they are (or most of them are), attributed to David is only a tradition and not a fact. David more than likely is a mythological character, for all the great achievements he is given by the Bible, it speaks volumes that there is absolutely no external evidence of his existence. I know in your world that evidence is not high on the list of priorities when investigating actual historical events, but for historians it one of those little annoying things that you got to have.
We know this from found documentation both in America and in the area known as the Dead Sea these things are factual.
This is another schoolchild error you keep making. Your total lack of education in history, or a related subject, is apparent when you keep repeating the words ‘fact’ and factual’, these are not terms that are used very often by historians and archaeologists. Evidence only implies, it very rarely does more than this. I suggest that you get a dictionary and look up the word ‘fact’ and see where you are going wrong.
Again I suggest you put down those false books written to dispel Biblical events that were only written for pocket money (called profit)
I think the Vatican, and other ‘Churches’ have profited fairly well from your false book.
in exchange for ignorant persons such as yourself aqnd (sic) to keep you ignorant to draw improper conclusions of what is a fact both historically and archeaologically (sic) which (sic) were done without profit.
These ‘facts’ would be what exactly, you still haven’t cited an external source for your ‘factual’ claims, what is the criteria your use in establishing a ‘fact’. Don’t bother answering that, I know the answer, if it is in the fairytale Bible book then it is a fact. I will refrain from the obligatory ‘DUH’.
You see you have NO proof that it isnt.(sic)
It is a bit of a bummer than that the person making the existential claim has the burden of proof, must be a real nightmare for you that. But you are not really that big on providing proof are you, do the people that you usually chat to not see how poorly educated you are?
We both know that don’t (sic) we?
I don’t think that you know an awful lot Doc.
All one has to do is read Psalms 22 and then read what Christ did say while upon the cross.
However, you have no proof that Jesus actually said this on the cross, do you seriously think that it is impossible for someone to make this up in order to prove a point? You do know that there is a dispute over his last words?
Even at His death He was teaching but you wouldnt (sic) know that would you brian?
Oh he was teaching alright, and I bet he got a real fright when he realised that he wasn’t a god after all! It was a pity that he wasn’t a more honest guy and confessed his sins before he died.
In fact in Luke a doctor not a spiritualist or imaginable delusions or lies wrote and did actual historical research as a man of science and reported what he did in his book by his own name.
Is your surname McFall, (sorry Brad just joking), I have no idea what on Earth you are saying here.
You see Christ never had a moment of doubt in the garden
LOL, really, this is why he was sweating blood, he was stressed to the max, have you ever read the Bible Doc?
nor hesitation to go to the cross for you. Something you inherently wouldnt (sic) know either.
This is getting pretty dumb Doc, who would inherently know this?
Of course you would have to be a bit of a scholar and historian as well as a linguist or perhaps know something of the languages used and written.
That certainly counts you out, maybe you should approach this again once you have sat some introductory courses?
Luk_12:50 When Christ said; "But I have a baptism to be baptized with," means; His crucification, (sic) not by water but by spirit is why he said he rendered his spirit to the father before he died. "And how am I straitened till it shall be accomplished!" just means; He was anxious to do it. And how I am straitened (kai pwv sunexomai [no greek (sic) fonts here]). See this same vivid verb sunexomai in Luk_8:37; Act_18:5; Phi_1:23 where Paul uses it of his desire for death just as Jesus does here. The urge of the Cross is upon Jesus at the moment of these words. We catch a glimpse of the tremendous passion in his soul that drove him on.
Well if Jesus was God, why should he fear death, he cannot die if he is a God, not even for a second, what is wrong with you?
Jesus fulfilled much of the old (sic) testament (sic) but of course you wouldnt (sic) know that brian (sic) would you since you refuse to study to shew (sic) thyself unto God a workman worthy of his praise.
Jesus fulfilled nothing in the Old Testament that relates to the Messiah, and the thing he could fulfil, could be fulfilled by countless people.
No you probably only want to worship your satan (sic) god and continue in his efforts to destroy. Like father like son?
Like Son of Stan you mean! LOL
Let's get you some fulfillment in your miserable darkened life.
Yeah, let’s do that, what do you suggest?
And people wonder why God allows this or that or doesn’t (sic) hear someones (sic) prayer, total ignorance like this denies Him.
Some people do yes, but I don’t. I really do not think about God at all, the tooth fairy has more influence on my life than God does.
The reason why one knows Psalms 22 and 69 were written almost 1,000 years before Christ is because David wrote them. Guess when he lived if you can brian?
You mean guess when you think he lived Doc, you have no proof that he lived at all, but I am familiar with the chronologies thanks.
Their births are recorded in the Roman legislature documentation for taxes that were demaned (sic) of every Hebrew the Romans had conqust (sic) over.
The Romans conquered David? The Romans have records of David’s birth, are you serious Doc? I think you will find that David was just a little bit before the Romans came to call.
DUH!
Very intellectual Doc.
Or are the Roman antagonitsts (sic) lying too?
I don’t know, since you haven’t posted anything of any substance to support your fantasy.
You see also in Egypt there are records by Pharoah's (sic) security forces of births and deaths.
Where are they then?
In fact the very kenites (sic) that murdered Christ on the cross to fulfill yet another part of prophecy today believes (sic) and has recordation of these events.
This would be?
Many today are called Islam.
Pardon, do you mean that many today are Muslim or Islamic?
Now if you know anyting (sic) about Islam you know they care not for the Jews nor Christianity but of course in your small unknowledable (sic) mind you wouldnt (sic) be up on current events that started about 636 A.D. or possibly you never heard of Mohamad?
Since I have taught an introduction to Islam course for four years I do know a little about Islam, including how to spell Muhammad.
Oh that’s (sic) right, there is no "proof" is there that he existed in your (sic) incompetant mental fradualties. (sic)
When did I claim this, there is ample proof that Muhammad was a real person, there is none such proof for Jesus though.
Some people are just plain lazy.
Or plain dense
Letters to Tiberius Caeser (sic) by one Pontius Pilate. Maybe you should read them brian (sic) and wake up to reality. Christianity is NOT a religion it IS a reality. LETTERS OF HEROD AND PILATE,
CONNECTING ROMAN HISTORY with THE Death OF CHRIST AT
JERUSALEM.
I cannot believe that you have fallen for this; these are nothing better than von Danikenesque dramas. They are fake for goodness sakes, what is wrong with you?
You have actually answered none of my questions satisfactorily. You have completely ignored the majority of my responses and now you are running away?
Why don’t you be honest with yourself for once and tell us the real reason why you are saying ‘bye-bye’?
I tell you what, I will do it for you. You are running away because you know that the average poster at this site is far superior than the morons that you are used to debating with. You realise that you are way out of your depth, and rather than slug it out, you up tail and run.
You really should hang around Doc, you may learn something, and you might even come to like some of us.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Doctor Robert, posted 10-28-2003 4:44 PM Doctor Robert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by Amlodhi, posted 10-29-2003 1:12 PM Brian has replied
 Message 133 by RichCarlson, posted 05-01-2004 7:30 PM Brian has replied

  
Amlodhi
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 212 (63319)
10-29-2003 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Brian
10-29-2003 10:18 AM


Re: Bible facts?
Hi Brian,
Your restraint in your reply to the good(?) "doctor" is commendable in the extreme.
Likewise your patience. Personally, I find it frustrating responding to lists of superficial assertions. Attempting to provide some posters with the education required for understanding would amount to a career in and of itself.
Namaste'
Amlodhi

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Brian, posted 10-29-2003 10:18 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Brian, posted 10-29-2003 5:34 PM Amlodhi has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 130 of 212 (63352)
10-29-2003 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Amlodhi
10-29-2003 1:12 PM


Re: Bible facts?
Hi Amlodhi,
Cheers, but I did stray from the path a couple of times.
I see that the 'Doc's' link to his website has been edited out by him, wonder why that is?
It is frustrating responding to a list of superficial assertions but it is really frustrating when it is an adult you are dealing with, why is it so difficult to see circular reasoning?
In his 'personal and statement of faith' he lists his qualifications as DD AND PhD, I am wondering if this is one and the same doctorate or two different doctorates? In Scotland they are two different qualifications, maybe it is different at Doctor Bob's degree mill?
He also says he has a policy of not stating where he earned his doctorate, LOL, it just has to be a degree mill, there is no way that this guy is a PhD, you can tell by his writing that he would struggle at high school level.
I was hoping Doctor Bob could have hung around, but there is always that message board at his site ! LOL and he has a chatroom there too.
Anyway, thank you (and others) for the support, catch you later.
Brian
[This message has been edited by Brian, 10-29-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Amlodhi, posted 10-29-2003 1:12 PM Amlodhi has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-18-2004 2:00 PM Brian has not replied

  
JustinC
Member (Idle past 4874 days)
Posts: 624
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Joined: 07-21-2003


Message 131 of 212 (63358)
10-29-2003 6:22 PM


Maybe it is just because I have never witnessed it, but in all my years reading these kinds of debates I have never seen an atheist, agnostic, or evolutionist run away stating something to the effect of, "You are all too stupid and this isn't worth it."
On the other hand, I've seen countless theists/creationist use this tactic. Maybe I just haven't been in the right place at the right time, though. Has anybody ever seen a non-theist/creationist do this?
JustinC

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by NosyNed, posted 10-29-2003 7:08 PM JustinC has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 132 of 212 (63367)
10-29-2003 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by JustinC
10-29-2003 6:22 PM


I think that some individuals may not bother responding to other individual posters as they figure no real communication is taking place. That is a mild form of "running away" and I have chosen that path in some cases.
However, I would distinguish that from not bothering to answer *anyone's* questions. Which is more of a real running away. I don't remember any obvious case of a "non-believer" (for want of a better term) doing that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by JustinC, posted 10-29-2003 6:22 PM JustinC has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-18-2004 2:04 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
RichCarlson
Inactive Member


Message 133 of 212 (104622)
05-01-2004 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by Brian
10-29-2003 10:18 AM


Re: Bible facts?
Dear Brian,
I realize that this thread is a little late. However, I was a little offended by the condescending tone of your message and felt it necessary to provide you with some of the facts that both of you failed to utilize in your arguement.
The following link provides historical veification to multiple references in the Bible: Forbidden. Just click on the "Adobe" archaelogical chart on the right. I hope this sheds some light on the darkness!
Thanks,
Rich

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by Brian, posted 10-29-2003 10:18 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by NosyNed, posted 05-01-2004 7:42 PM RichCarlson has not replied
 Message 135 by jar, posted 05-01-2004 7:44 PM RichCarlson has replied
 Message 142 by Brian, posted 05-03-2004 3:44 AM RichCarlson has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 134 of 212 (104624)
05-01-2004 7:42 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by RichCarlson
05-01-2004 7:30 PM


Re: Bible facts?
Welcome to EvCforum.
Brian will not be around too much until next week.
However the adobe link at the site doesn't work.
In addtion it is not clear how that site answers Brian's points. In general you should use a link as back up for your own words not as the whole answer.
You might want to read the forum guideline before you carry on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by RichCarlson, posted 05-01-2004 7:30 PM RichCarlson has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by JonF, posted 05-01-2004 8:06 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 135 of 212 (104625)
05-01-2004 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 133 by RichCarlson
05-01-2004 7:30 PM


Re: Bible facts?
You do, of course, realize that finding that the text of the Bible was in use and circulation at the expected time has nothing to do with proving the TRUTH of the Bible.
In addition, even if most historical and geographic events mentioned in the Bible were shown to have happened or exist, it still says NOTHING about the validity any of the Religious content of the Bible.
On the other hand, there are many things mentioned in the Bible that simply cannot be confirmed and in fact, can pretty conclusively be shown to have NEVER happened. One good example is the flood. There is simply no evidence anywhere that there was ever a worldwide flood, certainly not within the last few million years.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by RichCarlson, posted 05-01-2004 7:30 PM RichCarlson has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by RichCarlson, posted 05-01-2004 10:14 PM jar has replied
 Message 159 by PecosGeorge, posted 06-18-2004 2:14 PM jar has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 198 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 136 of 212 (104627)
05-01-2004 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by NosyNed
05-01-2004 7:42 PM


Re: Bible facts?
However the adobe link at the site doesn't work.
Works for me.
An alternative link to the same thing is Forbidden.
Most of it is just proving that some real historical figures and events are mentioned in the Bible. The last page or so is about the Exodus, correlating inscriptions (most from "Wadi Sidri") with the Biblical Exodus account. The correlations seem remarkable, but there's no citations, so I can't evaluate them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by NosyNed, posted 05-01-2004 7:42 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024