Independent Historical Corroboration for Biblical Events

Well there are a lot of problems with what you write.If yu want to discuss any of your supposed prohecies then choose one and start a thread on it.Here's some more facts for you.The authorship of Psalms is very uncertain (apart from the fact that it had multiple authors).The supposed reports of Pilate are well-known fakes.And no there are no official Roman records of Jesus birth (and wouldn't be - Roman censuses were for collecting taxes, and babies didn't have to pay them).And might I suggest that you avoid insulting people for knowing more than you.

Oh dear, the late Ron Wyatt's "work". Even Answers in Genesis are suspicious of his claims.

"Doctor Robert"'s hate-filled little rant deserves no comment other than to point out that there is good reason to think that he himself is guilty of at least 5 of the 7 things that the LORD hates.

What definition of "macroevolution" are you using ?Would the fossil and genetic evidence that links the whales to the artiodactyls be an example of something OTHER than claims ?And I see you're still upset that I caught you in your silly word game. Upset enough to lie again.Too bad.

Instead of being insulting about it you could just have said that you were using that definition. And you could have quoted it:"Large-scale evolution occurring over geologic time that results in the formation of new taxonomic groups."Well the evidence I referred to certainly supports that, so macroevolution has evidence and not just claims.And yes I think that "liar" is a good description for someone who, when caught playing word games falsely accuses his opponent of doing the same thing. So does dictionary.com.