This is an assertion without any support.
Man, we are getting strict here. Rightio.
I wrote:
The greatest pagan shrine to re-incarnation, God's creation? If you split a human hair in half - that is the difference between the British inch and the Sacred inch?
Point 1.
I'm no expert on ancient Egyptian religions, but I think I am safe in saying that a) the Pyramids a great (indeed the "greatest" of such shrines), b) the Egyptian religion is pagan and c) the whole idea of the Pyramids was to facilitate the re-incarnation 9or should that be bodily ressurrection?) of the Pharoahs.
The proposition that the greatest pagan shrine to re-incarnation is the Christian God's creation, seems at least a little far fetched and, I'd wager is utter, utter tripe.
Point 2.
Human hairs vary dramatically in width. I don't know whether Willowtree used this statement: "If you split a human hair in half - that is the difference between the British inch and the Sacred inch" as an attempt at a legitimate method of measure, or whether it was merely just a colorful way of saying that there is no difference between the two (I really can't tell with Willowtree: the stuff he posts in so left field).
If it was a method of measurement, then I claim it as utter utter tripe, based on me as an example. On the sides of my noggin' I have normal, healthy strong hair fibres of reasonable width. On the top, thanks to brilliant genetics pre-disposing me to male pattern baldness, I have feeble, thin and frail hair that is visible finer than the stuff on the sides.
Using human hair as a method of measurement is utter utter tripe.
™ Version 4.2
