Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is man inherently good or inherently evil?
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 271 (141789)
09-12-2004 2:59 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 213 of 271 (154737)
11-01-2004 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 211 by riVeRraT
11-01-2004 12:59 AM


Not so fast, RR
Ok, then why are many Jews converting to Christ? Jews for Jesus?
It has been pointed out to you that the "Jews for Jesus" may not be actual Jews. I don't think anyone has proven that. But you brushed off the suggestion with neither a request for back up or any support that they are converted Jews.
You don't get to use as fact something which is not as yet determined.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by riVeRraT, posted 11-01-2004 12:59 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 220 of 271 (154750)
11-01-2004 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 219 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:35 AM


Back up
Doesn't have any Jews in it. They're Baptists. They claim to be Jewish, but they lie.
To put this one to bed it would be a good time for you to back this assertion up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:35 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:56 AM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 229 of 271 (154846)
11-01-2004 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by AdminHambre
11-01-2004 9:28 AM


Re: Swords into Plowshares, Folks
Let me pile on a bit too.
RR I have to agree that there can be some arrogant sounding tone in Rrhain's posts. He can seem patronizing rather frequently. I find it possible to be a bit annoyed even when I agree with his view.
But that has nothing to do with the arguments being presented. Ranting about your reaction to what he has said accomplishs nothing.
You simple have to, patiently as possible, point out where he is wrong and show why you reached that conclusion. If he avoids your rebuttals, lies about anything or isn't overtly polite he will be brought to task by admins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by AdminHambre, posted 11-01-2004 9:28 AM AdminHambre has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 243 of 271 (156168)
11-05-2004 10:25 AM
Reply to: Message 242 by riVeRraT
11-05-2004 8:07 AM


Useless post
Since your post contributes nothing to the discussion and doesn't exactly make you look any smarter; why bother posting it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by riVeRraT, posted 11-05-2004 8:07 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 244 by riVeRraT, posted 11-05-2004 10:32 AM AdminNosy has replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 245 of 271 (156176)
11-05-2004 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 244 by riVeRraT
11-05-2004 10:32 AM


Re: Useless post
Now I understand where that comes from.
Rrhain does have an annoying habit of pasting in that little bit. However, he does it if you bring up Pascal's wager which you continue to do. If you understand what it is saying you would either show what you think is wrong with it or stop voiceing a form of Pascal's wager.
If you think he's doing that "every other post" then you are probably voicing the wager pretty often. He does have another annoying habit of repeating himself if someone ignores what they have been told before.
Perhaps you'd like to propose a topic on Pascal's wager and see if you can put a stop to it once and for all.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 11-05-2004 10:56 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 244 by riVeRraT, posted 11-05-2004 10:32 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by riVeRraT, posted 11-05-2004 2:29 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 265 of 271 (157225)
11-08-2004 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 262 by Rrhain
11-07-2004 7:23 PM


Back off on that Rrhain
No, you don't. You are lying.
This should only be charged if you have real evidence. The fact that RiverRat is confused isn't enough to charge this.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 11-08-2004 10:17 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by Rrhain, posted 11-07-2004 7:23 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 267 by Rrhain, posted 11-13-2004 5:12 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024