Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is man inherently good or inherently evil?
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 192 of 271 (154582)
10-31-2004 7:50 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by CK
10-31-2004 7:33 AM


You have missed all my points.
Actually you haven't. I know that.
In your reply you haven't acknowledge them. I do not have to explain myself to you, because you already know what I was talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by CK, posted 10-31-2004 7:33 AM CK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by CK, posted 10-31-2004 11:33 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 208 of 271 (154719)
10-31-2004 11:51 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by Phat
10-31-2004 11:28 AM


Re: Rat is having a Rrhainy day...
It was for rhain, not you.
rhain does not make me angry in the least. He just spreads confusion, and that picture is what God showed me about him. He knows what it means, I do not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Phat, posted 10-31-2004 11:28 AM Phat has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 209 of 271 (154724)
11-01-2004 12:25 AM
Reply to: Message 197 by Rrhain
10-31-2004 3:17 PM


In other words, they're a bunch of lying Christians out to forcibly convert Jews.
Great, now they are liars. Whats next?
Don't insult my intelligence, riVeRraT. We all know what you meant.
NO, you think you know what I meant. What I meant is what I said, something you may not be familiar with.
It is not the power I have over you, it is the exact opposite. It is how you stand firm in all your logic. I can see very clearly that your logic fails many times, and then one day you will realize it too. Then you demise will be meet. It will happen while you are alive, so it would have been impossible for me to have condemmed you to hell by saying that. I made it very clear to you, SEVERAL times that I do not condem people to hell, and I only judge them if it is in a good way.
Good will come from this bad rhain.
Unlike you, I realize that no matter how smart I think I am, I can be smarter. I also realize that I can learn from anybody, as I could not experience everything in life that they have, and the order of events that brings them to a certain point in life. I am not afraid to be wrong.
But, and here's the good part. God has shown me that you will rise up again, and overcome it all.
And as I responded to you before, if the Bible cannot be trusted to be an accurate reflection of god, how can we trust any of it? If this verse isn't true, what gives us confidence that any other verse is?
Listen, your the one who doesn't believe the bible, not me. You are the one that takes things in the bible out of context, and then uses it to not believe. If the bible is not right, then stop using it to prove things rhain, plain and simple.
Isiah 45:7 doesn not mean that he makes evil just for the sake of making evil. He makes evil (or brings disaster) to evil doers, who do not follow his good word. He does this for the good. So yes all that God creates is good, even the evil. But the evil from man is not good.
If someone was murdering someone you love, and God came down and did evil to them, by killing the perpetrator on the spot. would you consider this good or evil?
That somehow my actions will cause disfavor in the eyes of god and cause my "demise."
The demise will come from inside yourself. Funny how you think I have a direct line to God though, was it something I said? You can have that line too. Take my hand brother. Funny how you think I am going to cause it, as if could never come from yourself. Do you feel threatened?
Congratulations, riVeRraT. You just condemned everybody who doesn't believe in your god to hell.
There you go again. If I say something, it means only that thing and nothing else. There is only one path to righteousness. GOD will judge the rest, not me. I do not condemn people, they condemn themselves.
How they do that, I do not know. But they do.
Yep. I don't condemn anybody to hell the way some people do.
Just yourself right?
Incorrect. Pascal's Wager is the (false) philosophical claim that one should believe in god (specifically, the Catholic god). The idea is that if there is no god, then those who believe have lost nothing even though they gain nothing, either. But if there is a god, those who don't believe lose everything as they will be condemned to hell. Therefore, from a supposedly "pure mathematical" stance, one should believe in god since it results in no loss for infinite gain.
No rhain, you cannot use mathematics to solve this one. Its not binary. This will be part of your demise, your binary way of thinking is going to let you down in a big way one day, I know this.
You've already had to apologize to me once.
No I haven't
I did not say that I have not apologized to you, I said I did not have to apologize to you. I did it to be nice. You should try it sometime.
your saving of quotes is pure non-sense. IF we communicate 10,000 words to each other and you or I forget one, it doesn't make one or the other invalid. It makes us human. But you think in binary, so you can't see that. I have proved you wrong to inother posts, I have proved you a hypocrite. Does that mean you can't make a good point, no. I will still listen to rhain, I Love you.
You on the other hand never apologize when you are wrong, mmmm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Rrhain, posted 10-31-2004 3:17 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:12 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 210 of 271 (154732)
11-01-2004 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 198 by Rrhain
10-31-2004 3:32 PM


Lets see: rhains interpretation of Zechariah 9:10
The Messiah was supposed to be a warlord who would directly and physically cast out the unrighteous and unite the nation.
The bibles, that he quoted:
9:10: And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even to the ends of the earth.
In his classic fashion of translating what someone says to fit his needs at the moment, he thinks that speaking peace to heathen means he will be a warlord.
His dominion is currently from sea even to sea
And in the end (I love starting a sentence with and) it will be even more so, to the ends of the earth
Oh, and about faith in the bible:
I never claimed to know the bible better than anyone. I haven't even read the whole thing yet. I have completed the NT 2 times. I am not an expert on it. But the bible definatly contains God's word. The more I read it, and get into these type of debates, the more confirmation I get. I have recieved God's Holy word through the bible, and a baptism of the Holy Spirit. Knowing God's word in my heart allows me to translate what I read better than you so far. Without knowing God's word, and being led by deception, of course you would find all these contradictions.
Even still, if the bible has mistakes in it, either from translation, or mistakes from the author, It still contains God's word.
I try to focus mainly on what Jesus said. He promised a lot of things, and I have recieved them all, and continus to recieved them on a daily basis.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by Rrhain, posted 10-31-2004 3:32 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:33 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 247 by ramoss, posted 11-05-2004 11:35 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 211 of 271 (154734)
11-01-2004 12:59 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by ramoss
10-31-2004 9:30 PM


The misinterpretaitons of CHristians , using bad translations, and pushing pagan myths as well as pagan concepts onto the Jewish religion is irrelavent to the Jewish faith.
I did not mean to imply that. What I have seen is a shift in the way Jewish people do things, without being driven by Christ, that brings them closer to Christ. Most of it dealing with rituals. Has nothing to do with pagans.
The concept of the Messiah is different in Judaism. Jesus also did not met the requirement for the Jewish messiah. ALso, the concept of prophecy is not 'predicting the future' in Judaism either.
Ok, then why are many Jews converting to Christ? Jews for Jesus?
I understand about prophecy, but wasn't a prophet judged to be from God or not, based on the accuracy of his prophecies?
I am all ears.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by ramoss, posted 10-31-2004 9:30 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by AdminNosy, posted 11-01-2004 1:04 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 219 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:35 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 248 by ramoss, posted 11-05-2004 11:40 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 212 of 271 (154736)
11-01-2004 1:03 AM
Reply to: Message 203 by ramoss
10-31-2004 9:33 PM


Not if Jesus is the Messiah.
I am wrong?
I also understand the Jews get a second chance right, is that what you mean?
But wouldn't it beatiful for a Jew if he knew his Messiah? I find many awesome qualities in Hassidic Jews, that if they came to know their Messiah, well it would just be awesome for them. I mean this in a good way.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by ramoss, posted 10-31-2004 9:33 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:43 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 249 by ramoss, posted 11-05-2004 11:42 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 214 of 271 (154738)
11-01-2004 1:05 AM
Reply to: Message 204 by ramoss
10-31-2004 9:35 PM


Well to be honest, I am not an expert on it, and the one J4J tha I do know does in fact have a jewish heritage. So do most of the members of her church.
I will speak to her next time I see her and ask about that. I don't see her too often though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by ramoss, posted 10-31-2004 9:35 PM ramoss has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 216 of 271 (154744)
11-01-2004 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:12 AM


Wow, what a waste of time, whew.
Quick question, if the bible says your going to hell if you do XYZ, and I point that out, but actually do not accuse you of doing XYZ, who is condemning who to hell?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:12 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:47 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 217 of 271 (154745)
11-01-2004 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:12 AM


It isn't just one, riVeRraT. Nearly two dozen that I in only a half-hearted effort to collect have culled alone. This isn't a single instance of you misspeaking yourself. This is a consistent, repetitive behaviour of yours. Anybody who disagrees with your religious philosophy is a sinner doomed to hell.
*clears throat* Um no rhain, that is just you mis-interpreting me 2 dozen times with your binary thinking.
wow, just wow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:12 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 224 of 271 (154781)
11-01-2004 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 223 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:56 AM


Re: Back up
Of course the Jews are going to reject it. Just Silly rhain.
That doesn't make it Christian. In classic fashion you have contorted the evidence again, congradulations.
In your own link you posted it cleary sates that many of them were in fact once Jewish.
Your quote:
Doesn't have any Jews in it. They're Baptists. They claim to be Jewish, but they lie.
Your links quote:
According to its Executive Director, Jews for Jesus has many non-Jews in administrative and staff positions but deploys "only front-line missionaries who are Jewish or married to Jews."
That doesn't sound like "not any Jews". Plus I know one first hand.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 223 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:56 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by Rrhain, posted 11-03-2004 2:43 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 225 of 271 (154784)
11-01-2004 7:57 AM
Reply to: Message 221 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:43 AM


For example, there is no concept of death and resurrection in the Jewish tradition concerning the Messiah. Where on earth did that come from as it is not a Jewish thing.
Just because no-one Prophecies about him coming back from the grave, does not mean he didn't fill the phrophcies of the bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:43 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 233 by Rrhain, posted 11-03-2004 2:46 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 250 by ramoss, posted 11-05-2004 11:47 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 226 of 271 (154792)
11-01-2004 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 222 by Rrhain
11-01-2004 1:47 AM


riVeRraT responds to me:
quote:Wow, what a waste of time, whew.
(*chuckle*)
Two second to cut-and-paste. I didn't realize that you held your own viewpoints in such contempt. Your own views are a waste of time.
Hey, you said it. Not me.
Ok, so lets examine this response of yours. This is classic rhain stuff. In the first sentence of your reply, you acknowledge that my response is in reference to your lengthy post, by explaining how you got it to be that long. So you clearly understand why my response said what it said.
Then you proceed to twist what I say to make it sound like I am insulting myself, which you already know its not true. That makes you a liar.
rhain, I have no time to waste on people like you, who continually lie about themselves, and others. How would expect to find the truth amoung all those lies?
God is the truth, the devil is the king of all lies. You will choose your own destiny, and only you can condemn yourself. God will be the one to judge. I have nothing to do with that whole process, but to point out to you that there is a better way than they way you are living, a lie. That is clear now.
You justify your lies with your binary way of thinking, but 2+2 will never=5 No matter how bad you try to prove otherwise. Some may be fooled by your way of thinking, but the truth will shine through like a light.
This is why I cannot talk to you anymore, you are irrational, a liar, and a hypocrite. I have proven them all, so its not meant as an insult, but a truth. So go ahead and shrug your shoulders at me, and come up with a crazy long response that was designed to do nothing more stir up anger in someone (which you have failed to do with me).
Peace rhain. I still give you my blessings, and I still pray for you, even though you don't like it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by Rrhain, posted 11-01-2004 1:47 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by AdminHambre, posted 11-01-2004 9:28 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 234 by Rrhain, posted 11-03-2004 2:54 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 231 of 271 (155030)
11-01-2004 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by AdminHambre
11-01-2004 9:28 AM


Re: Swords into Plowshares, Folks
This is for both admins.
Calling someone irrational, a liar, and a hypocrite if they were all proven has nothing to do with my emotion, I have cleary stated that.
I also cleary stated that it is not an insult, but for rhains own good, its the truth.
His responses as a matter of fact are designed to stir up anger:
adminnosy writes
RR I have to agree that there can be some arrogant sounding tone in Rrhain's posts. He can seem patronizing rather frequently. I find it possible to be a bit annoyed even when I agree with his view.
So you obviously agree with me about the way he expresses himself.
AdminHambre writes:
Try to remain objective.
I do not find posts that are designed to stir up anger objective.
Telling the truth is very objective and condusive to the conversation. Telling me to be objective while rhain can do or say whatever he wants, even when the admins themselves aren't very found of it is just flat out wrong.
I don't think I am the one that needs talking to. I don't like to butt heads with the admins, but this is how I feel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by AdminHambre, posted 11-01-2004 9:28 AM AdminHambre has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 235 of 271 (155380)
11-03-2004 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 232 by Rrhain
11-03-2004 2:43 AM


Re: Back up
Seriously, riVeRraT: Who gets to be the final arbiter on who is or is not a Jew: Jews or Baptists?
Seriously rhain, who should we believe? The Jews percecuted Jesus 2000 years ago, and still do it today. I preach to many Jews and I see the percecution first hand. But its not all Jews.
My guess is that they still percecute him for the same reason they did 2000 years ago.
Who's the final arbiter? God.
But if Jew decides to believe in Jesus, and accept him as there Messiah, what difference does it make who is running their temple? What difference does it make who accepts it?
My own link clearly states that they NEVER WERE JEWISH
Funny you and I read 2 different things then.
According to its Executive Director, Jews for Jesus has many non-Jews in administrative and staff positions but deploys "only front-line missionaries who are Jewish or married to Jews."
Thats from your link. It says that there are Jews and non-Jews, but you decide to point out the non-Jews only, where is the logic in that? You must answer that question in order for us to recieve your thoughts as valid.
What part of "They are lying" don't you understand? As the article points out, this claim of Jewishness is only from being married to a Jew or having a paternal lineage to a Jew.
Quote the article then, because I read:
"only front-line missionaries who are Jewish or married to Jews."
Jewsish, OR married to Jews. That would mean both, not one or the other. That would be the reason why the Jews do not accept it. but that does not make the fact that Jewish people are indeed involved and have found their Messiah, invalid.
So your point is mute.
Did you figure this one out on your calculator?
Check the batteries.
This message has been edited by riVeRraT, 11-03-2004 07:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by Rrhain, posted 11-03-2004 2:43 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 238 by Rrhain, posted 11-05-2004 2:51 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 446 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 236 of 271 (155383)
11-03-2004 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 233 by Rrhain
11-03-2004 2:46 AM


but Jesus did things that the Jewish Messiah would never do such as claim to be god.
Of course, then Jesus would have to be the Messiah.
Can you prove that he did things that the real Messiah would never do?
Your claiming it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 233 by Rrhain, posted 11-03-2004 2:46 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by Rrhain, posted 11-05-2004 3:00 AM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 251 by ramoss, posted 11-05-2004 11:50 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024