God, The Supernatural And the Three Laws

How so? Why not?

Now that I'm caught up on responses, I've been thinking about this discussion about God, the supernatural and 2ltd relative to the sabbath day, as initiated in Genesis one. Genesis one states that after God finished his work involving six creation days, he rested on the sabbath/7th day. This's interesting, relative to his power. It appears to implicate that God's entropy did, as per 2ltd, increase to the point of having need of a rest day for resustenance to his desired power maintenance. This also seems to indicate that there is an ebb and flow of energy and entropy between God, the creator and his created universe.

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

If he has the power to operate and control the entire universe as supreme majesty and creator of the universe, I don't think he has a power problem. My remarks pertained to how he seems to function relative to the scientific laws observed.Sending his only born son, Jesus to suffer and die for the sins of his fallen creatures was certainly an increase in the entropy of the trinity, but the resurrection suddenly reversed that. So we see the ebb and flow regulated by god of energy to suit his purpose.

There is enough infomation in the texts as stated, but of course, not enough to prove that the miracle occured. I've provided all the information needed for the purpose of the thread. Whether it's a waste of your time depends on how interested you are in the information which I've provided as well of the responses. Likely you've learned something pertaining to my topic to think about which you were not aware of before it was submitted. Nobody's dragged you in kicking and screaming have they?

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz

I guess that depends on whether any counterparts step up to bat who can hit the ball for a run.

Admin Ned's bias is showing badly. He can't refute, so he turns to belittlement. That in turn gives the likeminded loosers in this debate a semblence of credibility in their/your meanspirited insults. THAT'S DIRTY POOL, PLAIN AND SIMPLE!!

That's a crock of bull, Ned. I've responded to nearly every post of this thread of counterparts and not one has effectively refuted including you. If you think you're so dang smart, bring up the posts I've made which are contrary to science and debate forthrightly like a man! The unfounded insults you're fostering border guideline violations, imo! We should expect more exemplary stuff from you, being in administration.

Go ahead and laugh, Ifen. Now that you have a chorus of loosers with you, it's fun, isn't it?THE TRUTH IS THAT THE REASON YOU AND SOME OTHER SORE HEADED LOOSERS IN DEBATE ARE TEARING YOUR HAIR OUT IS BECAUSE YOU'VE LOST THE DEBATE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE.This message has been edited by buzsaw, 12-12-2004 09:02 PM

Ifen, maboy/girl, It'd be nice if you'd grow up to stop acting bratish. I think your mother's calling you.

Thanks, Mike, and congratulations. You've finally contributed something substantive to the thread.

I suggest you read posts 86 and the last sentence in 94 where I've addressed this.

You're missreading me. Please tell me where you think I have said God must follow natural laws. Go to my op.1. True or false? The Biblical texts cited in my op involve what we consider to be the supernatural.2. True or false? One or more of the three natural td laws were violated in the text events cited in my op.I have not contended that God must follow what we consider to be natural laws. I have hypothesized that the observable td laws which we consider to be natural also appear to be applicable to the Biblical spiritual as well. I don't see what you people consider to be so crazy about this hypothesis. I'm not asking anyone to believe in the supernatural, but if it does exist, why do members think it's cool and proper to insult and belittle another poster for bringing up this possibility for discussion by the group?

Hi Percy. It's a shame when one must have a following for one to express one's opinion here. New thought is chastized and outright banned. I've been shouted down by a pack, not one of who has refuted my op, showing that if the Biblical texts cited were true, the supernatural events in them would not violate the 3td laws. That means that so far I've won this debate and the frustrated counterparts have managed in their/your frustration, to censor me for confounding them/you.Now how nice of you to allow me to continue, with the addendum that "nonsensical threads will be closed." Since you've already judged my win here in this thread to be nonsense, you can shut it down and I'll look around for a place where I can talk nonsense.

By challenging you and your friends to refute my op and getting no scoring hits. I have stated the 3td laws along with the text and challenged someone to show that they violate the laws as stated. So if thermodynamic calculations are required, why the heck didn't you produce some thermodynamic calculations to prove me wrong? And btw, do you have the thermodynamic calculations to verify that Rich Gore's so called scientific particle of space satisfies the 3d laws? Can you qantify that submicroscopic particle of his? Hmmm?

---

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buz