Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evolution vs. creationism: evolution wins
CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 74 of 310 (128602)
07-29-2004 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by HxC4Christ
07-29-2004 4:27 AM


Re: How is it possible to prove either or??
God Lord - this post is actually the same as my parody in the Evolutionists pretend to be creationists in the coffee shop!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by HxC4Christ, posted 07-29-2004 4:27 AM HxC4Christ has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by NosyNed, posted 07-29-2004 11:48 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 133 of 310 (178144)
01-18-2005 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by xevolutionist
01-18-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Some concerns about proof
Well the TOE is made up of lots of facts. I think you are starting to get the hang of this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by xevolutionist, posted 01-18-2005 10:57 AM xevolutionist has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 137 of 310 (178158)
01-18-2005 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by xevolutionist
01-18-2005 11:42 AM


Re: Some concerns about proof
quote:
that doesn't negate my statement that those sites claim to provide proof.
Can you provide some context for your statement? A link and a relevant quote from one of those sites? One where they make a claim of "proof".
Maybe you would like to read this (from one of the sites that you mention:
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Scientific "Proof", scientific evidence, and the scientific method
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 01-18-2005 11:49 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by xevolutionist, posted 01-18-2005 11:42 AM xevolutionist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by xevolutionist, posted 01-18-2005 12:40 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 207 of 310 (178705)
01-19-2005 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by xevolutionist
01-19-2005 5:57 PM


Re: Some concerns about proof
Ah - you work in the academic sphere - what's your area?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by xevolutionist, posted 01-19-2005 5:57 PM xevolutionist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by xevolutionist, posted 01-19-2005 6:05 PM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 210 of 310 (178711)
01-19-2005 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by xevolutionist
01-19-2005 6:05 PM


Re: Some concerns about proof
Oh so it's mindreading then? or you are saying that your friends make things up to get published and then tell you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by xevolutionist, posted 01-19-2005 6:05 PM xevolutionist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by xevolutionist, posted 01-19-2005 7:58 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 254 of 310 (180485)
01-25-2005 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 3:23 PM


Re: Fossil record
Wow - that desperate old misquote - you really need to try harder, those of us who been around the block a few times have seen that one lots of time.
Maybe you should tell us Darwin recanted on his deathbed as an encore?
stopping going to junk creationist sites and try actually reading the work that they mangle

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 3:23 PM xevolutionist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 260 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 3:47 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 262 of 310 (180495)
01-25-2005 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 256 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 3:38 PM


Re: quote mining
quote:
I was just supporting my conclusions with those of people who you might respect. How is it that equally qualified scientists can come to different conclusions when studying the same evidence?
So you read the paper, understand the content of the quote and it's place in the discourse?
Right?
You haven't just cut and paste it straight from some nutty creationist site?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 256 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 3:38 PM xevolutionist has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 297 of 310 (180567)
01-25-2005 6:12 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 6:09 PM


Re: semantics
Could you provide us with a link for that site and a pointer towards the bit that you feel says that?
You seem to have that odd mindset shown by believers who feel they know "the truth" - either we know all or we know nothing.
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 25 January 2005 18:15 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 6:09 PM xevolutionist has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 305 of 310 (180587)
01-25-2005 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 304 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 7:31 PM


Re: define your limits - with references
Why, why are you doing this to yourself? What are you opening up a second front for attack?
STOP LOOKING AT CREATIONIST SITES AND READ SOME SCIENCE BOOKS.
sigh....
OK would you like to define information for me? What does it mean? Not in the general sense - within the context of your example.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 304 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 7:31 PM xevolutionist has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024