Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Education and Creation/Evolution ⇒

evolution vs. creationism: evolution wins

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evolution vs. creationism: evolution wins
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 99 of 310 (148937)
10-10-2004 4:31 PM 		Reply to: Message 96 by MaxAug
10-10-2004 12:16 PM

W e l c o m e !!
Welcome to EvC, MaxAug.
​
It would be a good idea for you to review the guidelines from the home page and,perhaps, to spend a bit of time reading over what others are posting before diving in to quickly.
​
I would also suggest that you be careful about what links you use.
​
None of the "evil" evolutionists here, including those who are very much believing Christians will not be rather to very, very familiar with the sites you posted. If you relay on them you might be disappointed.
​
Here you are also expected to supply your own defence of your position with reference to links. If you don't understand the arguments on your own you will be at a disadvantage.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by MaxAug, posted 10-10-2004 12:16 PM MaxAug has not replied
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 100 of 310 (148938)
10-10-2004 4:31 PM 		Reply to: Message 96 by MaxAug
10-10-2004 12:16 PM

W e l c o m e !!
Dumb double post.
​
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 10-10-2004 03:41 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by MaxAug, posted 10-10-2004 12:16 PM MaxAug has not replied
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 108 of 310 (176964)
01-14-2005 11:04 AM 		Reply to: Message 106 by RED WOLF
01-14-2005 10:58 AM

A small slip?
I'm sure your duplication of this post is a small slip up.
​
I might note that at least you cro magnon comment is an unacknowledge quote from somewhere else. It is against forums rules to plagerize. Since this is just a line it isn't serious but please be careful.
​
In addition this is not one issue but many that belong in a number of forums. Please take each issue to the appropriate place.
​
You will find that you are arguing without knowing much, if anything, about what you are discussing.
​
It is unfortunate that many creationist sites are misleading and dishonest. You should be careful about useing them as a source for your arguments.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by RED WOLF, posted 01-14-2005 10:58 AM RED WOLF has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Quetzal, posted 01-14-2005 11:07 AM AdminNosy has not replied
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 113 of 310 (177035)
01-14-2005 3:32 PM

Fuzzy Topic
Even though this topic is somewhat fuzzy please do not respond to the wildly divergent range of issues here.
​
You could carry each one to an appropriate thread.
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 301 of 310 (180580)
01-25-2005 6:52 PM 		Reply to: Message 291 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 5:49 PM

Answering questions
It is a part of intellecutally honest debate to answer questions put to you. They are very clear questions. It is time for you to answer just as clearly.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 5:49 PM xevolutionist has not replied
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 303 of 310 (180583)
01-25-2005 7:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 302 by xevolutionist
01-25-2005 7:01 PM

Assertions must be supported
And a million mutations couldn't funish the new information needed for flippers.
​
That is an assertion, you have no support for it.
​
I meant that there are limits to the species ability to change.
​
That is an assertion, you have not supported it yet.
​
Yes I know that animal breeding is not natural selection, but it shows that important genetic information is lost, not gained in new sub species. Domestic animals are a valid example in that context.
​
It has been pointed out to you why artificial selection is a flawed example. You have not answered those points.
​
But lions and tigers can breed. What am I missing now? Didn't someone state that the ability to breed was one of the defining factors determining species? Yes, I think they are all cats.
​
Have you googled the definition of species on the web? I think it is time you start doing a bit of your own research since you seem to be ignoring what is posted to help you learn.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 7:01 PM xevolutionist has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 306 by xevolutionist, posted 01-25-2005 7:40 PM AdminNosy has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024