Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,898 Year: 4,155/9,624 Month: 1,026/974 Week: 353/286 Day: 9/65 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   evolution vs. creationism: evolution wins
Poole
Inactive Member


Message 174 of 310 (178376)
01-18-2005 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by coffee_addict
01-18-2005 3:08 PM


Jacen's Signature
Hi All,
Even though this is wildly off topic, this signature has been annoying me while lurking through. Hopefully this hasn't been discussed before.
Here is something to relieve stress.
Assume that a does not equal b.
a + b = t
(a + b)(a - b) = t(a - b)
a - b = at - bt
a - at = b - bt
a - at + t/4 = b - bt + t/4
(a - t/2) = (b - t/2)
a - t/2 = b - t/2
a = b
Since all numbers are the same, math is useless.
The error in logic falls between the line (a - t/2) = (b - t/2)
and a - t/2 = b - t/2. The square function, f, is not linear.
i.e. f(a)=f(b) does not necessarily imply a = b.
An example of this is (-3)^2 = (3)^2, yet it goes without saying that -3 does not equal 3.
With a + b = t, a - t/2 simplifies to a/2 - b/2, with b - t/2 simplifying to b/2 - a/2. Given that a does not equal b, it is obvious that one of the terms is positive while the other is negative.
If you multiply one side by the corrective negative sign.
One obtains
a - t/2 = -(b - t/2)
a - t/2 = -b + t/2
a + b = t, which is the initial relationship.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by coffee_addict, posted 01-18-2005 3:08 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by coffee_addict, posted 01-19-2005 2:27 AM Poole has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024