Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Validity of differing eyewitness accounts in religious texts
Percy
Member
Posts: 22505
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.4


Message 61 of 305 (202194)
04-25-2005 12:21 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Faith
04-25-2005 11:31 AM


Re: Back to the point
Hi Faith,
I think anyone would grant that the Koran differs markedly from the Bible, but you seem to be saying that the Bible is the prototypical religious text, and that religious texts which do not follow its template do not possess spirtual credibility.
It would be really really nice if even one person here would address a point I actually made, some of which are:
The Bible IS concerned with witness accounts; the Koran is not.
I thought I saw this addressed a couple times. Looking back through the thread, I see TheStudent addressed this point in Message 49. I didn't look any further back.
But even if we grant for the sake of argument that the Bible contains witness accounts and the Koran does not, you haven't explained how this difference bears on each text's spirtual credibility. Why could not a supporter of the Koran argue that it is superior because it is free of witness accounts?
Further, we have yet to clearly define witness accounts. As the other thread made clear, saying that something was witnessed and having evidence that it was truly witnessed are different things.
I'll leave it to others to address the rest of the specifics of your post. I think I've made my point that all you've really said is that the Koran and the Bible are two different books. Whether one approach is superior to the other regarding spirtual truth remains an open question. The criteria used for making such a judgement must first be agreed upon. You can't unilaterally declare the criteria, especially when they boil down to, "Koran not like the Bible, so Koran not valid."
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 11:31 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:00 PM Percy has replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 62 of 305 (202198)
04-25-2005 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by doctrbill
04-25-2005 8:26 AM


Re: but what if god DID write a book?
It occured to me, just yesterday, what a strange thing it is that God, who is a spirit (having no physical body), is supposed to have written a book (I know this is not perfectly accurate); while his Son (who is human and has hands), is supposed to have written nothing.
precisely.
In more than 6,000 years of confusion, argument and bloody conflict over what God wants: Neither the Big Guy himself, nor his God-on-earth Son would stoop to pen a single page (except for the 15 ... errrr, 10 Commandments) and we are left holding a moldy sheepskin with virtually indecipherable chicken scratches etched by an ancient Jew and purporting to be "The Word" of this silent God!
no no, we LOST those. remember? SOMEONE left them in the ark...
And if you like that ... You'll love this Florida swampland ...
the REALLY ironic part of that is that i live in florida. on former swampland, i'm sure.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by doctrbill, posted 04-25-2005 8:26 AM doctrbill has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 63 of 305 (202199)
04-25-2005 12:33 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by JonF
04-25-2005 8:12 AM


Re: OT: linking to messages
you know i never bothered to learn how to do that? thanks for the tip.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by JonF, posted 04-25-2005 8:12 AM JonF has not replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 305 (202206)
04-25-2005 12:47 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Faith
04-25-2005 11:31 AM


Re: Back to the point
Yeah Faith, this must be the biggest conspiracy after JFK assassination, not to mention you have nailed everyone here and they are speechless (NOT).
quote:
It would be really really nice if even one person here would address a point I actually made, some of which are:
You think in your mind that you have made points (of course whatever, you made was answered by many including your's truly). But you have been repeating yourself like a broken record rather using reason and logic.
quote:
The Bible IS concerned with witness accounts; the Koran is not.
Faith, you are not a Muslim and not learned of Glorious Qur'aan, therefore, you possess no right and/or authority to speak for Qur'aan; especially when your rhetoric is contrary to all other known facts. Glorious Qur'aan is a direct revealed word of Allaah, whereas the NT is the work of Ghost Writers.We cannot apply rules of evidence on your NT, it flunks the test. The so-called evidence provided by the written gosples is "hearsay" evidence. Hearsay evidence is secondhadn evidence. In the case of the gospels, the ghost writers are reporting stories and sayings related to them by "intermediate" parties; none of them was an ear of eyewitness of the words and events he records. Indeed, the information may have passed through several parties on its way to the ghost writers of the first written gospels. Those initial transmitters of tradtion are, of course, anonymous; they cannot speak for themselves and we cannot interrogate them about the source of their reports. We don't even know who they were? The authors of the written gospels are also anonymous; the names assigned to them are pious fiction.
quote:
The Bible makes many references to the witnessing of key events; the Koran has no events to witness.
read the above response. BTW, which part of my statement that " Islaam and/or Glorious Qur'aan give no status to Christianity and /or mentions "Jesus" at all" you don't understand? Why you are desperately trying to bail Bible out using Qur'aan as your diversionary tactics? You want to debate Bible vs. Qur'aan, fine with me. I will take you on anywhere. Let us start a new thread for that. But for crying outloud stop making assertions without presenting facts and/or evidence. You cannot save your NT, using Qur'aan as scapegoat.
quote:
The Bible's prophets identify themselves in real time and place and their prophecies in real time and place, to authenticate them; the Koran has only one prophet and it says nothing about his credentials.
How they identify themselves? In fact, what prove you have that they all were prophets at all from Abraham to Jesus? Let me see your evidence? Don't worry about the Qur'aan, since you don't believe in that and you don't follow Qur'aan. Let us stick to your high flying claims of alleged Biblical Prophets; please present the evidence that they were prophets at all to begin with?
quote:
The Bible has multiple authors over 15 centuries, and they refer to each other as authorities; the Koran has one and only one author and no corroborating witness to his qualifications.
Quotes please from the Bible, where the alleged authors have referred to each other as "authrority?" Again, don't worry about the Qur'aan. You are more worried about the Qur'aan than Bible, why? You don't see me jumping up and down, needless to mention that I am a Muslim.
quote:
Also, both books are said to have been authored by God but only the Bible quotes God Himself as speaking to many of its authors, as in "The Lord spoke to Moses" -- 80 times in the book of Numbers; as in "The word of the Lord came to me" -- all the prophets; Mohammed refers to Allah in the Koran but he personally spoke only to an angel he called "Gabriel."
I hate to expose your ignorance, but the Glorious Qur'aan nowhere mention and/or asserts itself to be authored by God. It is the truly revealed word of Allaah. Again, God spoke to Moses, I believe in Moses that is a part of my belief; without which I can't be a Muslim. However, as Muslim it is not a big deal for me that Allaah spoke to Moses. Perhaps, it may be a bigger deal for you. Read this and know why it is not a big deal for me: What a great difference there is between the TWO. What do you know about Islaam, Muhammad and Jibrael? I bet you are clueless, if not prove it by answering my questions rather dodging my posts.
quote:
These are important facts concerning the authentication of the Bible versus the Koran. Just about everybody here is discussing something other than these facts.
Yeah sure, you are so assertive and authorative and we all are dumb-founded (NOT). Forget about the entire Bible, let us talk about your NT, which tells us that Jesus was a liar, why?
In the Gospel according to Matthew, Jesus is allegedly reported to have said the following in chapters 10 and 16:
010:023
But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come.
016:027
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
016:028
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
These two statements cited above, precisely suggests that only one of the two things can be possible, there,
1. Was Jesus a LIAR, or
2. Gospel[s] were not inspired
Christians claims that (1) Jesus is God and/or Son of God (2) Bible (NT) is the true word of God, does not seems to be based on truth, because the references cited above from the gospel according to Matthew can’t be from a human with average intelligence and/or some one with presence of mind; let alone from God and/or to be the inspired word of God.
The absurd claims made in Matthew 10:23 and 16:27-28 are certainly wrongly been attributed to Jesus because all those standing here (16:28) have already been dead for about 2000 years, and none of them saw Son of Man (allegedly Jesus) coming into his so-called kingdom.
Matthew 10:23 (Jesus supposedly addressing his disciples) is also OBVIOUSLY absurd, because Jesus’ disciples did travel and almost all got persecuted except John, who committed suicide. AGAIN, Son of Man (Jesus) remained NO SHOW. Jesus didn’t come as of today.
By the way, how do you know that you are worshipping the right "Jesus" (of Nazarenne). What if the "Jesus of Jerusalem" (during the same era and/or timeline) was the right "Jesus.?"
Your NT tells us that Jesus was a False Prophet at many places. Let me cite one proof out of many:
Falsehood of Jesus: How the Messiah Can be From Nazareth?
The following statement is found in the Gospel according to Matthew:
KJV/Matthew: 2:23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets; He shall be called a Nazarene.
The above statement is absolutely false, since we can’t find this statement in any of the books of the prophets. Jews also deny the validity of such prediction. According to the Jews it is simply a false claim. On the contrary they had a firm belief that no prophet would ever come from Galilee, not to say of Nazareth, as is expressly stated in the Gospel according to John:
KJV/John: 7:52 They answered and said unto him, Art thou also of Galilee? Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet.
Therefore, the Christian Bible itself testifies against Jesus, proving his falsehood. John 7:52 is the nail in the head of Christianity.
This message has been edited by Checkmate, 04-25-2005 11:49 AM

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 11:31 AM Faith has not replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 305 (202213)
04-25-2005 1:02 PM


Faith
I am fairly new to this forum, and still trying to learn how things works while postings messages. Having said that I like to invite you for a debate about Bible vs. Qur'aan in this forum. We need to define some rules of the debate and also we need to define certain terms and words along with their implications and/or connotations etc.
Do you think that you can live with it and debate on the subject: Bible vs. Qur'aan on another thread?
Regards
Checkmate

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by PaulK, posted 04-25-2005 1:08 PM Checkmate has not replied
 Message 67 by Admin, posted 04-25-2005 1:44 PM Checkmate has replied
 Message 71 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:18 PM Checkmate has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 66 of 305 (202217)
04-25-2005 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Checkmate
04-25-2005 1:02 PM


This board has a Great Debate forum that is reserved for one-on-one debates. If you are looking for a more formal discussion that might be the best way to set it up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 1:02 PM Checkmate has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13045
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 67 of 305 (202225)
04-25-2005 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Checkmate
04-25-2005 1:02 PM


Reply Button
I noticed your reply to Faith is actually posted to PaulK. The little reply buttons at the bottom of each message are for replying to that specific message. Replies are threaded forward and backward with links to make it easy to follow a discussion. General replies not specific to any message, or perhaps specific to more than one message, should use the larger Reply button that appears twice on each message page, once in the upper right, and again in the lower left.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 1:02 PM Checkmate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 2:03 PM Admin has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 68 of 305 (202229)
04-25-2005 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Percy
04-25-2005 12:21 PM


Re: Back to the point
The topic of this thread is the Validity of Differing Eyewitenss Accounts in Religious Texts. The Bible has many many eyewitness accounts of all the miracles and major events that have come to be the meat of Biblical religion, and the reports are mutually authenticating from author to author. I think it's obvious that witness evidence is worth a ton more than the writings of one lone individual who gives no credentials for himself or anything he wrote. If you want to argue that witness accounts mean zip, I don't feel like arguing it. Believe what you please. And it's not the topic of this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Percy, posted 04-25-2005 12:21 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 2:21 PM Faith has replied
 Message 78 by PecosGeorge, posted 04-25-2005 3:10 PM Faith has replied
 Message 85 by Percy, posted 04-25-2005 3:31 PM Faith has replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 69 of 305 (202231)
04-25-2005 2:03 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Admin
04-25-2005 1:44 PM


Re: Reply Button
Oops, sorry Admin and PaulK.
This message has been edited by Checkmate, 04-25-2005 01:04 PM

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Admin, posted 04-25-2005 1:44 PM Admin has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 70 of 305 (202234)
04-25-2005 2:15 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by PaulK
04-25-2005 11:48 AM


Re: Back to the point
Let us note that when I tried to discuss these issue in Validation tests ? (Message 31) the only point Faith chose to answer related to the Quran. The points I raised regarding the Pentateuch have yet to be addressed.
quote:
Message 31: Going over the various points that are supposed to validate an ancient document, we come down to just two.
1) Authority of the Author.
The author of the Quran is supposedly God. That would trump Moses on points such as the creation stories.
I did answer this, more than once. There is no indication whatever that God is the author of the Koran except that people are told that he is. The Bible however contains dozens of references to God's speaking with Moses and others, and I did answer this even in my last post. I also answered it when I said that Moses knew the Creation stories from speaking with God face to face.
More importantly we need to reliably identify the author. What is the evidence that Moses wrote the Pentateuch ?
I also answered this. If you want to get nitpicky about "wrote" I already answered that too. Moses is the traditional author in the sense of being responsible for the Pentateuch. He got the laws direct from God but he is the one who "wrote" them down, or dictated them or taught them to the people from which teaching a scribe wrote them down. It doesn't matter, the source is Moses. He is named in many places as the source. And where he is talked ABOUT that is somebody else filling in the story as the entire Pentateuch is both BY AND ABOUT Moses.
Moreover the assessment of Moses character we get from the Pentateuch must depend on whether he is assumed to be the author or not. Consider this verse, for instance:
(Now the man Moses was very humble, more than any man who was on the face of the earth.)(Numbers 12:3 NASB).
Answered above.
2) Concern with importance of "witness authority and authenticity". These would presumably include things like identifying the author and the sources used by the author. Which books of the Bible identify themselves as being written by Moses ?
I was specific that I was referring only to the frequency of appearance of the word "witness" throughout the Bible, period. I also gave a very shortened list of OTHER references to Moses as the author of the Pentateuch in Message 19. These include specific references within the Pentateuch to Moses' authorship. You are insisting on a narrow definition that no believer insists on. These are trivial concerns, nuisance concerns, you are raising.
Which of the uses of "witness" are used to identify the author as a witness of the events ? Do all the books not written by witnesses identify their sources ?
I defined witness in two senses in my first post and said both apply to Moses.
If the Pentateuch identifies neither the author nor sources we cannot say that it has any authorial authority or any concern with "witness authority" so far as it applies to the work itself. Thus, with the lack of evidence reliably identifying Moses as the author the Pentateuch clearly fails on both points and must be rejected as beign a valid eyewitness account.
You make up your own rules and don't address anything I said.
{Sorry, I did edit some changes into this text.}
This message has been edited by Faith, 04-25-2005 01:22 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by PaulK, posted 04-25-2005 11:48 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by PaulK, posted 04-25-2005 6:37 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 71 of 305 (202236)
04-25-2005 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Checkmate
04-25-2005 1:02 PM


I'm not interested in debating the Qu'ran. I made a few simple points about its utter lack of the barest attempt at authentication, and that's all I'm up for on this thread. If I have time I will review your posts later, but I don't have time now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 1:02 PM Checkmate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 2:29 PM Faith has not replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 72 of 305 (202238)
04-25-2005 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Faith
04-25-2005 2:00 PM


Re: Back to the point
Faith, I did make honest efforts to have a dialogue with you. You have repeatedly avoided me same way the Biblical Jesus avoided the "Jerusalem." Because,
Jerusalem has always been a focal point of all Israelites prophets, but Jesus avoided Jerusalem as any other city because it was a city of Pharisees (who have repeatedly debunked Jesus), disputers, scribes, unbelievers, and shallow believers. Socialism preached by Jesus does not address villagers, but inhabitants of large cities. Contrary to that Muhammad — goes to the cave of Hira but each time retunes to the godless city of Makkah to carry out his mission.
Jesus never preached and Christianity has never reached the full conscientiousness of one true God. In fact, Christianity has only a vivid concept of the divine and not a clear idea of God. The mission of Muhammad — was to make the gospels’ image of God clearer and closer to the human mind and thought that Jesus failed to accomplish. In the gospels’ God is so-called father; in the Glorious Qur’aan, God is master. In the gospels God is vaguely loved; in the Glorious Qur’aan, God is loved clearly and respected.

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:00 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:25 PM Checkmate has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 73 of 305 (202240)
04-25-2005 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Checkmate
04-25-2005 2:21 PM


Re: Back to the point
You are trying to argue the entire content of the Koran and the Bible. That is not the topic here. The topic is the validity of differeing eyewitness accounts, period.
This message has been edited by Faith, 04-25-2005 01:26 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 2:21 PM Checkmate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Checkmate, posted 04-25-2005 2:40 PM Faith has replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 305 (202244)
04-25-2005 2:29 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Faith
04-25-2005 2:18 PM


We can debate your Bible and/or New Testament
quote:
I'm not interested in debating the Qu'ran. I made a few simple points about its utter lack of the barest attempt at authentication, and that's all I'm up for on this thread. If I have time I will review your posts later, but I don't have time now.
Hi Faith
That is fine with me , let us debate your Bible and/or New Testament and/or Biblical Prophets and/or Jesus and/or so-called eyewitness accounts. Or pick anything from your Bible and we will inSha Allaah debate that. How about this, your pick?

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:18 PM Faith has not replied

Checkmate
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 305 (202253)
04-25-2005 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Faith
04-25-2005 2:25 PM


Re: Back to the point
quote:
You are trying to argue the entire content of the Koran and the Bible. That is not the topic here. The topic is the validity of differeing eyewitness accounts, period.
Well, then let us discuss that, right? Let me begin by saying that there were no eywitnesses. I also assert that Jesus was a Muslim, who was neither killed nor crucified.
Here is the Proof # 1 that Jesus was a Muslim.
Jesus (pbuh) use to greet his disciples like a Muslim, by saying: Peace be unto you, (John 20:19). Muslims use the same words to greet, (but in Arabic): As’Salaamu Alaikum.
Proof # 2
In John 16: 12 & 13, Jesus says:
I have yet many things to say unto you, but you cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth;
This prophecy (we have discussed earlier) by Prophet Jesus (pbuh) refers to Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), whose arrival his followers were directed to await. The many things that Jesus would have liked to tell his followers have not been told to them, not because Jesus did not know them, but only because his followers were not ready to bear them at that time: ... but you cannot bear them now.
When Jesus (pbuh) states you cannot bear them now, it only refers to his followers and does not include himself. But did he follow in action what he knew and was ready for? Yes. He did much of what a Muslim would do and is expected to do. In fact, this begins to happen even while he anticipates arrest by the Roman rulers.
He comes to know that he will be betrayed by one of his disciples, Judas, into the hands of the Jews, who intended to kill him. Apart from this, the other thing that makes him sorrowful is that he was expecting to do many things that a Muslim does. He was looking forward to the joy of doing all those things; but now his end is staring on the face. He tells his disciples:
My soul is exceeding sorrowful unto death: tarry ye here, and watch.
(Mark 14:34)
The one thing that he can surely do, before he is arrested, is to pray to the Lord as a Muslim prays. So he prays like a Muslim and does prostration (Sajda), touching his forehead to the ground:
And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed.... (Matthew 26:39) What is his prayer to the Lord? The verse (Matthew 26:39) continues: ...saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as you will.
Mark 14:36 says about his prayer: And he said, Abba, Father, all things [are] possible unto thee; take away this cup from me: nevertheless not what I will, but what you will.
Luke 22:42 says about Jesus’ prayer: Saying, Father, if you be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but your, be done.
The common thing observed from the above verses is: Jesus (peace be upon him) prays to the Lord to save him from the anticipated persecution at the hands of the Jews; yet not as Jesus wishes but as the Lord wills. Do you realize what Jesus is stating at this moment? He subdues his wishes and submits himself to the will of Allaah. In other words, Jesus declares his Islaam, submission, at that moment.
A Muslim is one who has submitted to the will of Allaah. Islaam means submission (to the will of Allaah), while it also means Peace. Thus, by declaring his submission to the will of Allaah, Jesus declared himself to be a Muslim.
It was also mentioned in Chapter 2 that Jesus (pbuh), as also the other prophets before him, called themselves ‘Muslims’.
But, then, why their followers were not named as ‘Muslims’, too?
If the followers of the different other prophets were also to be called as ‘Muslims’, then there would have been confusion in distinguishing between the true Muslims (who believe in all the prophets) and the followers of other prophets (who believe in some prophets and disbelieve in the rest). Belief in all the messengers of Allaah is a basic requirement to be called a Muslim. Allaah tells the Muslims in Glorious Qur’aan (2:136)
قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَى إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَى وَعِيسَى وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ
Say (O Muslims), "We believe in Allh and that which has been sent down to us and that which has been sent down to Ibrhm, Ism‘l, Ishq, Ya‘qb, and to Al-Asbt (the offspring of the twelve sons of Ya‘qb), and that which has been given to Ms and ‘s, and that which has been given to the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we have submitted (in Islm)."
Thus, Jesus (pbuh) practiced Islaam, i.e., Submission and he got Islaam, i.e., Peace. As the Bible tells us in Luke 22:43!
And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.
This is in appreciation of his act of Submission and as an answer to his prayers. The Bible just says that the angel strengthened him. Surely, he was not lacking in physical strength at that moment but what he needed most desperately was solace and assurance from the Lord that he would be saved from the arrest and wanted the freedom to perform the things he wanted to do as a Muslim.
So, Jesus the Muslim (peace be upon him) had prayed in ARABIC: Yaa Ilaahi, Yaa Ilaahi, Lima Sabaqtanee . Yes, this is what he asked the Lord at that moment. O my Lord, O my Lord, Why have you advanced me (in my end)?
Since he wished to do important things which a Muslim must do while he is still alive, the threatened end troubles him. So his prayer: O my Lord, O my Lord, Why have you advanced me?
Having not understood what he said, but actually having misunderstood what he said, the writers of the Gospel shifted these words into a situation where it fitted according to their understanding and scheme. The prayer has thus been misunderstood and misinterpreted then quoted out of context.
He did not utter such words at the cross, where he was never taken. They say that Jesus said: "Eli, Eli, Lama Sabachtani? That is to say: My God, My God, why have you forsaken me? "(Matthew 27:46)
The above statement attributed to Jesus is totally wrong, because:
1. God will never forsake His messenger.
2. Jesus, who submits himself to the will of the Lord, will never utter such a word.
The prayer of Jesus (pbuh) did not go unanswered, but was answered through the angel, which appeared, in order to strengthen him. Luke 22:43: And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him.
What message did the angel carry from the Lord, in reply to Jesus’ question: O my Lord, O my Lord, Why have you advanced me? Let us read in Glorious Qur’aan, 3:55!
إِذْ قَالَ اللَّهُ يَا عِيسَى إِنِّي مُتَوَفِّيكَ وَرَافِعُكَ إِلَيَّ وَمُطَهِّرُكَ مِنَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا وَجَاعِلُ الَّذِينَ اتَّبَعُوكَ فَوْقَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ ثُمَّ إِلَيَّ مَرْجِعُكُمْ فَأَحْكُمُ بَيْنَكُمْ فِيمَا كُنْتُمْ فِيهِ تَخْتَلِفُونَ
And (remember) when Allh said: "O ‘s! I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you (of the forged statement that ‘s is Allh’s son) of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you (Monotheists, who worship none but Allh) superior to those who disbelieve (in the Oneness of Allh, or disbelieve in some of His Messengers, e.g. Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم, ‘s, Ms, etc., or in His Holy Books, e.g. the Taurt (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), the Qur’n) till the Day of Resurrection {1} . Then you will return to Me and I will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute."
{1} (V.3: 55) The advent (descent) of ‘s, (son of Maryam) عليه السلام. a) Narrated Abu Hurairah رضي الله عبه Allh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه و سلم said, "By Him in Whose Hand my soul is, surely (‘s), the son of Maryam عليه السلامwill shortly descend amongst you (Muslims), and will judge mankind justly by the law of the Qur’n (as a just ruler); he will break the cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jzyah " (i.e. taxation taken from non-Muslims). Money will be in abundance so that nobody will accept it, and a single prostration to Allh (in prayer) will be better than the whole world and whatever is in it." Abu Hurairah added: "If you wish, you can recite (this Verse of the Qur’n): "And there is none of the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) but must believe in him (i.e. ‘s عليه السلام as a Messenger of Allh and a human being) before his (‘s عليه السلام or a Jew’s or Christian’s) death, and on the Day of Resurrection, he (‘s عليه السلام) will be a witness against them." (4:159). (See Fath Al-Bari, Vol.7, Page No.302) According to the quotation of Kushmaihani there is the word Al-Jizyah * instead of Al-Harb (Sahih Al-Bukhri, Vol.4, Hadth No.657). b) Narrated Abu Hurairah رضي الله عنه Allh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم said: "How will you be when the son of Maryam (i.e. ‘s عليه السلام descends amongst you, and he will judge people by the Law of the Qur’n and not by the law of the Injeel (Gospel)." (Fath Al-Bari, Vol.7, Pages 304 and 305) (Sahih Al-Bukhri, Vol.4, Hadth No.658). * The Jizyah: a tax imposed on non-Muslims who would keep their own religion, rather than embrace Islm) will not be accepted by ‘s عليه السلام, but all people will be required to embrace Islm and there will be no other alternative.
Got answers, Faith?
I will inSha Allaah walk you through the entire accounts of arrest, trail and alleged crucifixion and resurrection ; using your own Bible. Let us proceed with these two proofs and then we will inSha Allaah move on.
This message has been edited by Checkmate, 04-25-2005 01:40 PM
This message has been edited by Checkmate, 04-25-2005 01:43 PM
This message has been edited by Checkmate, 04-25-2005 01:43 PM

"An uninformed person cannot conceptualize the essence of knowledge nor its sublimity. One who fails to conceptualize something, its significance will never become rooted in the heart."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 2:25 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by jar, posted 04-25-2005 2:43 PM Checkmate has replied
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 04-25-2005 3:15 PM Checkmate has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024