There can be science in here; coherently metaphysical "energy", if conspiring motions (Newton drew this difference with the same chemistry Kant discussed) are inspiration of Kurts'.
Kurt said in his book
quote:
Creation vs. Evolution :
Creation and evolution work in unison. The former can not survive without the latter. If a man and woman desire a child, they set into motion processes of creation and evolution.
The bible states, "If you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, `Move from here to there, and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you." As long as this is not taken literally, it is indeed a true statement.
If a city Master Plan calls for a mountain to be relocated, it will be done. Were the planners, designers, architects, contractors, or the laborers responsible for the finished product?
If God, via inspiration initiates a process, or causes currents to carry a germinated seed on a meteorite to a distant planet; to create and have life evolve thereby, is not God creating life and responsible for evolution?
If life is created and it does not evolve, it perishes.
Creation of the universe is a formation of something from nothing. If evolution is combined with creation, we have a feasible concept. Most religious concepts of creation are that God, a mysterious entity that has always existed, came out of nowhere and created the entire universe; this is illogical.
Evolution is the development, progression change of organisms, cells or molecules by means of the adaptation to the demands of the environment. Mass and energy is the result of evolution. Dust particles gather to evolve into mass. If mass is compressed to the point of fusion, spontaneous combustion and fission create energy; the universe thereby evolves.
I prefer to stick with the difference of a circle and oval however.
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 05-20-2005 04:49 PM
™ Version 4.2