|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is Liberal? | |||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tal writes: Liberal's Genearally believe:Larger Government Redistribution of Wealth from the producers to non-producers Gun Restrictions Higher Taxes Smaller Military Pro Choice More Govnt Regulation of Business Proponents of Gay rights Yep, that's me, pretty much. Got a problem with that? People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes: They are actually considering treating as criminals those who preach the Bible.... Here in Saskatchewan, a man was recently convicted of using hate speech against gays, in the guise of "preaching the Bible". http://www.saskhrt.ca/forms/Descisions/050205.htm I'm proud to say I was one of those who reported him to the police.
...forcing laws on us via a leftist judiciary.... I don't know how it works in the U.S., but in Canada the legislature passes the laws and the judiciary interprets them. (By the way, our judiciary is far too right-wing to suit me. ) This message has been edited by Ringo316, 2005-07-21 09:42 AM People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes: I can't tell from a brief glance through that very lengthy report exactly what it is about. If you can't be bothered to read the report (which is shorter than many of your posts ) here are a few quotes from the pamphlet in question:
quote: (Now you know: that is what is considered "hate-speech" in Saskatchewan.) You were the one who complained about liberals "treating as criminals those who preach the Bible". I simply pointed out a case where that is a good thing.
...you are simply having an argument and stating your liberal case, instead of helping to define the categories.... It's a spectrum: far left, left, center, right, far right. They are not "categories", so "definitions" are irrelevant. What we're discussing here is where we draw the line between "liberal" and "conservative". That line is obvoiusly in a different place in Canada than in the U.S. I initially responded to Tal's claim that liberals are "ashamed of being liberal". I told him that I am proud to call myself "liberal". (Note to Canadians: that's small-l "liberal", not big-L "Liberal". ) I continued that theme with you, stating that I was proud to stand up for my liberal beliefs. To sum up: instead of trying to define "liberal" with a lot of hot-air rhetoric, I'm trying to give an example of what it is to be liberal, and why that is a good thing. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes: ... maybe later I'll read it through and tell you how wrong you no doubt are. Thanks for being so open-"minded". People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
If you're going to quote me, at least read what I said:
Ringo316 writes: Here in Saskatchewan, a man was recently convicted of using hate speech against gays, in the guise of "preaching the Bible". "In the guise" of preaching the Bible means that he was pretending to preach the Bible when, in fact, he was preaching hate. It's the same as if he was preaching hatred of black people because the Bible condemned Ham's descendents. It's the same as if he was preaching child abuse because Jesus said, "Suffer the little children." It's not persecution of religion. It's suppression of a perversion of religion. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tal writes: They have the freedom to marry a member of the opposite sex just like anybody else. Like Henry Ford used to say, "You can have a Model T in any color you want - as long as you want black". That isn't freedom. Real freedom would be the freedom to marry the person of their choice. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tal writes: What if I want to marry more than one person of my choice? What if I want to marry my dog or my horse? Its my choice. That's real freedom. It would be bigoted of you to tell me otherwise. Need another reading lesson? I'm not telling you otherwise. By all means, marry as much livestock as you want. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Tal writes: ... there are reformed homosexuals who have become christians and are now heterosexual. By all means, don't list any sources or studies to back up your "well established fact." Let's see them. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
arachnophilia writes: the dangerous bit is not the conservative use of the word "liberal" but that they are using to describe other conservatives who do not fit their particular radical ideas. Exactly. The "everybody-to-the-left-of-me-is-a-liberal" definition of "liberal" is pretty useless. To many pseudo-conservatives, the word "liberal" has become just another swear-word, like "commie" or @#$%. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Chiroptera writes: I think of "liberal" and "conservative" as more or less the same thing You'd fit right in in Saskatchewan. (Pssst. Don't tell anybody, but we actually have a "socialist" government here.) People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Many moons ago - I think it was during the Nixon administration - I read something similar in a Canadian newspaper editorial:
A liberal thinks everybody in the world wants to be an American. A conservative wants to make eveybody in the world an American. People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 441 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes: The right does not use lying terminology. They say what they mean. Unfortunately, you don't know what the words mean. You don't know the meaning of the word "liberal", you don't know the meaning of the word "conservative", you don't know the meaning of the word "left", you don't know the meaning of the word "right", you don't know the meaning of the word "murder".... People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024