Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Pat Robertson shows again why the Christian Right is such a laughingstock
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 106 of 232 (236715)
08-25-2005 8:18 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by GDR
08-24-2005 2:18 PM


Re: I agree..for example where's...
quote:
I'm just wondering who you see jumping in to support him. Your statement just shows your own bias. Is there anybody of any political leaning on this forum agreeing with him?
I wish Jar hadn't started this thread so soon.
All of us pinko leftists should have waited a week to see if any of the rightists were going to start one instead of just responding to this one.
My thoghts is that you (meaning you personally and also the collective conservative you) oppose him personally but not so much that you will refuse the sizeable vote block he can deliver.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by GDR, posted 08-24-2005 2:18 PM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by jar, posted 08-25-2005 10:49 AM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 107 of 232 (236716)
08-25-2005 8:24 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by randman
08-24-2005 3:13 PM


Re: Howard Dean
quote:
So the religious right has Pat Robertson and the democrats have Howard Dean.
Pat is a liar, crazy, and a hypocrite.
Dean is smart, passionate, and honest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by randman, posted 08-24-2005 3:13 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:30 AM nator has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 108 of 232 (236717)
08-25-2005 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by FliesOnly
08-25-2005 8:09 AM


Re: Retraction?
I see you are having trouble reading.
FliesOnly writes:
Who fucking cares? This seems like more typical right-wing "let's quickly change the subject and/or blame someone else" bullshit.
Check it out. Read carefully.
Tal writes:
Pat Robertson = MORON!
He shouldn't use his national TV program (that represents christianity) to support illegal activity period
There it is.
FliesOnly writes:
WTF...Robertson has lost it...admit it...get over it, and stop shifting the conversation about how the Right is right.
In case you missed it the first 2 times...
Tal writes:
Pat Robertson = MORON!
He shouldn't use his national TV program (that represents christianity) to support illegal activity period
There it is again.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by FliesOnly, posted 08-25-2005 8:09 AM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by FliesOnly, posted 08-25-2005 10:40 AM Tal has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 109 of 232 (236718)
08-25-2005 8:27 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by nator
08-25-2005 8:02 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
What would you say about a country's economy where millions of children go without enough food
Ohhhh Schraf..gonna have to stop you here. Post a link to the millions of starving children in the US.
You mean, kind of like the publically-held corporation in which the workers bust their humps so the idle who own the stocks can gain?
Let's hit the breaks again. How did these "idle" people get the money to invest in stocks I wonder?
yet around 90% of the wealth is controlled by only 2% of the people?
Yeah, gonna have to stop you here again. Instead of throwing out arbitrary numbers though, I'll cite facts.
The overwhelming majority of federal income taxes are paid by the very highest income earners. The top 1% of income earners pay about 32% of all income taxes. The top 5% pays 51.4%. The top 10% of high income earners, pay 63.5%. The top 20% of income earners pays 78% of all federal income taxes.
If you make 50,000 a year or more, you are in the top 50% of income tax payers. 300,000 a year or more puts you in the top 1%. You say (with no facts) that the top 2% have all the money. Guess what, the top 5% are paying more than 50% of income taxes.
If I were you, I would bless those top 2%. They are who pay for all those nice social programs.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:02 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 9:24 AM Tal has replied
 Message 126 by nwr, posted 08-25-2005 10:23 AM Tal has replied
 Message 165 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:22 PM Tal has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 110 of 232 (236719)
08-25-2005 8:29 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by FairWitness
08-24-2005 7:07 PM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
quote:
On the other hand, if he is a thug, a communist who remains in power by other than democratic means in a democracy, then we have a right, possibly a duty, to voice opposition to that circumstance.
You mean like in China?
And Saudi Arabia?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by FairWitness, posted 08-24-2005 7:07 PM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:05 AM nator has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5706 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 111 of 232 (236720)
08-25-2005 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by nator
08-25-2005 8:24 AM


Re: Howard Dean
Dean is smart, passionate, and honest.
Yeah, keep thinking that!
YYEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:24 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 9:31 AM Tal has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 232 (236725)
08-25-2005 9:05 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by nator
08-25-2005 8:29 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
Yes, just like them. And I don't believe we've ever voiced approval for oppression by any foreign government, regardless of their size, power or trading status. We do enjoy friendly relations with Saudi Arabia, it does not follow that we support all that goes within that sovereign country's government. The same holds with China. Different situations call for different tactics, too. Venezuela isn't China, now is it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:29 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by Yaro, posted 08-25-2005 9:18 AM FairWitness has replied
 Message 167 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:26 PM FairWitness has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 113 of 232 (236727)
08-25-2005 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by nator
08-25-2005 8:02 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
You obviously are ignorant of how people come to own stock in publicly held companies, sir. They earn income, that they pay taxes on & with the after tax money, having first paid their mortgages, car payments, insurance premiums, grocery bills, etc., they use the money they've saved to buy stocks in companies. Those companies in turn use the money they raise selling their stocks to invest in new jobs, equipment, facilities, etc. It's called the free market, capitalism, the American dream. And BTW, the bulk of stocks are owned by pension & profit sharing plans & mutual funds of workers like you & me, not the wealthy. The middle class in this country owns the vast majority of the wealth in this nation, not the rich.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:02 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 9:49 AM FairWitness has replied
 Message 169 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:33 PM FairWitness has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 114 of 232 (236728)
08-25-2005 9:18 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by FairWitness
08-25-2005 9:05 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
And I don't believe we've ever voiced approval for oppression by any foreign government, regardless of their size, power or trading status.
No. Then why do we support Israel?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:05 AM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:24 AM Yaro has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 115 of 232 (236730)
08-25-2005 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by nator
08-25-2005 8:02 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
BTW, nobody goes with healthcare in this country. They may not have health INSURANCE, but anyone can go to an emergency room in any town in America & they must be treated for anything from a hang nail to a head cold to a brain tumor to open heart surgery, free of charge. There's a big distinction, don't you agree?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 8:02 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by nator, posted 08-25-2005 10:01 AM FairWitness has not replied
 Message 144 by jar, posted 08-25-2005 10:54 AM FairWitness has replied
 Message 172 by Nuggin, posted 08-25-2005 1:37 PM FairWitness has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 116 of 232 (236732)
08-25-2005 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Tal
08-25-2005 8:27 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
quote:
Ohhhh Schraf..gonna have to stop you here. Post a link to the millions of starving children in the US.
Are you actually going to tell me that you don't know there is a hunger problem in the US?
And I can't help but notice that you misquoted me and left off the part where I said that millions of US children don't have any health care coverage, which you clearly know is true but hoped I didn't notice that you left it off my statement.
Instead of addressing that shameful shortcoming of ours, the most fabulously wealthy country on the planet, you just ignore it.
link
Hunger and Food Insecurity in the United States
One of the most disturbing and extraordinary aspects of life in this very wealthy country is the persistence of hunger. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) reports, based on a national U.S. Census Bureau survey of households representative of the U.S. population, that in 2003 11.2 percent of all U.S. households were "food insecure" because of lack of resources. Of the 12.6 million households that were food insecure, 3.9 million suffered from food insecurity that was so severe that USDA's very conservative measure classified them as "hungry."
Since 1999, food insecurity has increased by 2.1 million households, including 1.1 million households with children. In 2003, 36.3 million people lived in households experiencing food insecurity, compared to 33.6 million in 2001 and 31 million in 1999. See FRAC's analysis of and a link to the full report: Household Food Security in the United States, 2003
The number of children under 18 living in poverty in the US is 12,488,000, or 16.9%
quote:
How did these "idle" people get the money to invest in stocks I wonder?
Most of them inherited it.
Let me be clear. I am well aware that many in the midddle class own stocks these days. But they do not own, say, controlling or influential interest in a number of large, multinational corporations that enable them to enjoy breathtakingly fabulous profits in the millions, sometimes billions of dollars. THOSE are the people who hold the money in this country, and the vast majority of them didn't start out as file clerks. The money has been in most of those families for generations.
The Bill Gates' of this world are very, very rare, regardless of what the Republican party has led you to believe. Most of the money in this country is passed from generation to generation (like the Hiltons, or the Bush's) and that's where it will stay, as long as the tax codes keep the rich getting richer and the middle class shoulder most of the tax burden.
quote:
If I were you, I would bless those top 2%. They are who pay for all those nice social programs.
No, they don't, the middle class pays for most of the social programs in the US.
What you don't know about taxes and who pays the most is a lot.
If we take into account impact and proportion of total income, the lower and middle class tax rates are much higher than the those of the rich.
You also have forgotten all about payroll taxes and sales tax, both of which hit middle and low income peope proportionately more than the rich.
If I pay taxes of 50% of 10 million dollars, I still have 5 million dollars, but if I pay 15% of $40,000, I am left with $34,000. It is much, much easier to live on $5,000,000 than it is to live on $34,000, right?
Additionally, there is a cap on paying payroll taxes if you make over $90,000. So, the lower middle class and lower class pay a greater share of the government programs that payroll taxes pay for compared to the upper middle class and the rich.
Sales tax also hits poorer people harder because it is the same regardless of income level and when you are poor you spend a larger proportion of your income on consumer goods than rich people, who have the ability to make their money into even greater sums of money through investment or at the very least savings accounts which earn interest.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 08-25-2005 09:29 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:27 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 9:51 AM nator has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 117 of 232 (236733)
08-25-2005 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 114 by Yaro
08-25-2005 9:18 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
I should think that would be obvious. They've been oppressed by violent terrorists for decades, enemies all around them. And until recently, they've been the only democracy in the ME.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by Yaro, posted 08-25-2005 9:18 AM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Yaro, posted 08-25-2005 9:39 AM FairWitness has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 118 of 232 (236734)
08-25-2005 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Tal
08-25-2005 8:30 AM


Re: Howard Dean
Can you please show me some examples of his ideas, suggested policies, or vales which are not smart, passionate, or honest?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 8:30 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Tal, posted 08-25-2005 10:22 AM nator has replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6525 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 119 of 232 (236735)
08-25-2005 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by FairWitness
08-25-2005 9:24 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
They've been oppressed by violent terrorists for decades, enemies all around them.
Ummm... you don't think those people opposed to them have any legitimate claims? Or do you think their in the 'violent opposition' game for shitz and giggles?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:24 AM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Faith, posted 08-25-2005 10:02 AM Yaro has not replied
 Message 162 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 1:06 PM Yaro has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 120 of 232 (236737)
08-25-2005 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by FairWitness
08-25-2005 9:16 AM


Re: Obviously not Christian, but....
quote:
You obviously are ignorant of how people come to own stock in publicly held companies, sir. They earn income, that they pay taxes on & with the after tax money, having first paid their mortgages, car payments, insurance premiums, grocery bills, etc., they use the money they've saved to buy stocks in companies.
That's true of middle class people who buy stocks, but that is a fairly recent phenomena.
It is not true for the people who control the vast majority of the wealth of this country.
quote:
Those companies in turn use the money they raise selling their stocks to invest in new jobs, equipment, facilities, etc. It's called the free market, capitalism, the American dream. And BTW, the bulk of stocks are owned by pension & profit sharing plans & mutual funds of workers like you & me, not the wealthy.
Who owns the large blocks of stock which return millions in profits to single people?
quote:
The middle class in this country owns the vast majority of the wealth in this nation, not the rich.
That is simply not true according to every source I can find.
Including this article from the Wall Street Journal
I hope you aren't going to claim the WSJ is a "leftist rag" or something.
Despite the rise of self-made millionaires, the growing fortunes of the wealthy highlight the extent to which wealth remains concentrated among the few. Even after the huge economic gains during the bull market of the late 1990s, the wealthiest 1% in the U.S. control more than a third of the nation's wealth -- the starkest such concentration among industrialized countries.
A new study by Edward N. Wolff, a wealth expert and an economics professor at New York University, shows that while average families made some gains in the late 1990s -- due mainly to rising income, real estate and stocks -- the concentration of wealth held in the U.S. remained largely unchanged. The wealthiest 5% controlled 59.2% of the nation's wealth in 2001, little changed from the 60.3% in 1995.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 08-25-2005 10:03 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 9:16 AM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by FairWitness, posted 08-25-2005 12:52 PM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024