Much of your message is simply a cut & paste job from AIG without even giving the attribution. This is a violation of forum guidelines.
EvoPeach writes:
In the example we looked at, there is no reason to believe that the differences between the two gull species are the result of any new, more complex, functional genetic information not already present in an ancestral, interbreeding gull population.
AIG writes:
In the example we looked at, there is no reason to believe that the differences between the two gull species are the result of any new, more complex, functional genetic information not al-ready present in an ancestral, interbreeding gull population. Because there is no evidence of any such information-adding change, it is misleading to say this gives evidence of evolution, of even a little bit of the sort of change required to eventually turn a fish into a philosopher.
Please understand that most folk here are already very familar with the stuff over at AIG.
™ Version 4.2
