Author
|
Topic: Where are all the missing links?
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
Enough already, back to the topic
thx
This message is a reply to: | | Message 57 by Omnivorous, posted 08-12-2005 1:48 PM | | Omnivorous has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
A jumbled post
Mr. C., you are posting several things in one post most of which do not have anything to do with this topic. In addition, though you don't know it, you are spouting some of the most simple-minded and utterly wrong creationist arguments. It would be a good idea for you to do some reading here and in reputable sources before you jump in with both feet (in your mouth). You may if you insist join existing threads in dates and dating for your views on C14 dating. You could even propose a topic of your own but it doesn't appear that you are ready to. Note: The forum guidelines require you to support any assertions that you make. You now have an outstanding one regarding the formation of organs. You might do well to concentrate on that. NOTE: NO ONE IS TO JUMP IN ON ANYTHING NOT ON THIS TOPIC. This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 08-14-2005 09:53 PM New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts. Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures Thread Reopen Requests Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 67 of 302 (233281)
08-14-2005 11:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 66 by randman 08-14-2005 11:02 PM
|
|
Re: the difference between rare and common?
There is a fossilization process thread. I think that will be better for discussing "rare" etc. For now let's leave this one sorting out what a "link" is then we can discuss "missing". (You have been given references to taphonomy sites which do give some quantification of 'rare'. I suggest you sort that out before cluttering up other threads. All the questions you are asking here have been answered several times. I also suggest that you go and find the answers. Do not keep asking!)
This message is a reply to: | | Message 66 by randman, posted 08-14-2005 11:02 PM | | randman has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 106 of 302 (233510)
08-15-2005 6:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 88 by Admin 08-15-2005 4:14 PM
|
|
Re: Off-topic post on vestigial organs.
Opps And I have not noted that. Excuse me.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 88 by Admin, posted 08-15-2005 4:14 PM | | Admin has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 117 of 302 (233578)
08-16-2005 1:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 116 by nwr 08-16-2005 12:46 AM
|
|
commonality
It is a different thread! Not here.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 116 by nwr, posted 08-16-2005 12:46 AM | | nwr has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 152 of 302 (233844)
08-16-2005 8:04 PM
|
Reply to: Message 146 by Evopeach 08-16-2005 5:27 PM
|
|
Evopeach Finished with the Science Threads
Since none of your posts shows any hint of understanding what you are talking about and all of them show significant attitude (particulary troublesome from someone who knows so little) I don't think that you will ever manage to participate in the science side of EvC. I am suspending your privileges to that half of EvC indefinitly.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 146 by Evopeach, posted 08-16-2005 5:27 PM | | Evopeach has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
|
Message 165 of 302 (239222)
08-31-2005 7:56 PM
|
Reply to: Message 162 by randman 08-31-2005 7:37 PM
|
|
becoming very repetitious
Unfortunately Randman, you seem to have limited capacity to learn and a nasty tendancy to repeat assertions to often. I think that you need a 24 hour break from any of the science forums. Since I will then be moslty offline for a week you will have to depend on someone else to get back. In addition, it you bring up more science based issues in the other threads you will lose your priveleges there too.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 162 by randman, posted 08-31-2005 7:37 PM | | randman has not replied |
|
AdminNosy
Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: 11-11-2003
|
references
There is indeed one belief that all true original Darwinians held in common, and that was their rejection of creationism, their rejection of special creation. This was the flag around which they assembled and under which they marched When offering quotes it is appropriate to offer the source in which the quote is to be found. (Note: this must be a source directly from Mayr}
|