In my opinion, the absense of partially formed creatures in the fossil record is evidence against evolution; the evolutionary theory requires creatures with partly formed organs. And these partly formed creatures are not found in the fossil record(as far as I know, if you know of some, please tell me).
I agree that we do not need all of the transitional forms(partially formed animals), but when you do not have any(or few), how can you say that the fossil record is evidence of evolution?
This message has been edited by Mr. Creationist, 08-15-2005 12:07 AM