Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where are all the missing links?
Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 302 (233346)
08-15-2005 8:19 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by randman
08-14-2005 11:02 PM


Re: the difference between rare and common?
The fact there are thousands of fossils for some species, such as Basilosaurus, indicates that fossilization is not as rare as evolutionists claim.
And yet, at places like the La Brea tar pits, we have loads of sabretooth cats. One could conclude that big cats were once as numerous as prey animals. Ever considered that there might be some peculiar reasons for so many Basilosaurus to be in one place? (I'm assuming you're refering to Wadi Hitan, the so-called 'Zeuglodon Valley' in Egypt?)
Oh and incidentally, randman. It's interesting that you haven't moved on at all in the four years since you had your fundament handed you on whale evolution over at IIDB. Still banging away, eh?
SSDD.
TTFN, DT (Oolon Colluphid)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by randman, posted 08-14-2005 11:02 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by randman, posted 08-15-2005 1:35 PM Darwin's Terrier has replied

Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 153 of 302 (234373)
08-18-2005 5:28 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by randman
08-15-2005 1:35 PM


Re: the difference between rare and common?
no, it was my impression that the majority of Basilosaurus were found in Louisiana where fossilized parts are often found and used in various ways, for household decorations, lamp pieces, etc,..
Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi... the Atlantic coast of North America in general... quite a few sites, actually... and most famously, Wadi Hitan in Egypt. So when talking about thousands of fossils, I guessed you meant in one place.
It's quite humorous to hear how ignorant you are
And I only read your posts for the laughs.
and assumed that they have been found only in one place in massive numbers
No, I did not assume that. 'Zeuglodon Valley' has many Basilosaurus fossils, and is famous because of Gingerich's finds. All you had said was that there are thousands, and that's the most famous place to find lots of them. I know they are found elsewhere.
As to why they are numerous (though I doubt 'thousands' -- please reference), it is simply that they inhabited shallow seas where beaching was likely.
But to return to your point: fossilisation is generally rare, because things get eaten and / or decompose before they make it into the rocks. But if the conditions are right, many things can become fossilised, as the cliffs at Dover show. I fail to see why this is difficult, or a difficulty for evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by randman, posted 08-15-2005 1:35 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Admin, posted 08-18-2005 9:17 AM Darwin's Terrier has replied

Darwin's Terrier
Inactive Member


Message 155 of 302 (234440)
08-18-2005 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 154 by Admin
08-18-2005 9:17 AM


Re: the difference between rare and common?
*tugs forelock* Right-ho Guv'nor...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Admin, posted 08-18-2005 9:17 AM Admin has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024