|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1497 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: "...except in the case of rape or incest." | |||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1497 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Yeah, I mean, we just want to control women's uteruses. That's completely unrelated to all the other aspects of control we want over women.
These damn feminists, can't keep the issues seperate!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 446 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
You guys are nuts, I can't even agree with you, and you have to get all upset at me, and take out the wrongs of the world on poor ol riverrat.
Exposing the lies, one truth at a time!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Tal Member (Idle past 5707 days) Posts: 1140 From: Fort Bragg, NC Joined: |
People don't kill people Cartoons kill people
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
ROFLMAO!!!!!!
THat is a good one Tal LOL "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
To Crashfrog:
Hi There You seem a little harsh in your reply to my post. Take it easy dude. Didn't we learn from the 60's? Make love not war (Of course, I was born in the early 80's, but I love to look at history) Would I belly up and adopt a kid? If I was married and we decided on it, sure. I'd rather have my wife pregnant (I love pregnant women) but heh, adoption is pretty darn good. I have adopted dogs and other critters in my life, why not a human. There are more kids waiting for adoption than there are couples that want them, but it makes it worse that more and more american couples are adopting overseas. I think most couples would want to adopt a baby too, not a 3-10 year old child. Course I could be wrong. BTW: I have da balls LOL "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
Hmm, no pro choicer has replied yet.
Has the right-wing won this debate, or is this the calm before the storm? I think it will be the latter. Get ready to hit the dirt!! "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
Hey Tal
You have got to post more pictures like that. kudos on it. This message has been edited by LudoRephaim, 03-15-2006 11:06 AM This message has been edited by LudoRephaim, 03-15-2006 11:09 AM "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: The risk of death is 11 times higher for carrying a pregnancy to term and giving birth than for having an abortion. The risks increase if the girl is very young.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
Hey there Schrafinator (I hope I spelt that right)
going full term in pregnancy is 11 times more dangerous for the woman than an abortion? That does make some sense. Do you have a source for the info? I'm not saying "liar liar pants on fire" I would just want to read it. I love to read Be careful though. I can see where the argument where going if you where debating a hyper-pro lifer. Schrafinator: Abortion is much safer for the woman than enduring a full term pregnancy. Hyper Pro-lifer: Safe for the woman, but definitely not for the unborn child! One thing leads to another.... Hyper Pro-lifer: leave me alone! Schrafinator: Hey! Stand still!! smack! Jab! crunch!! (LOL) BTW: Since pro-lifers (like myself) and Pro-choicers debate on whether the unborn should be called "child" or "fetus" I propose a new term (from texas) : VARMIT! "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1534 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
Yeah, this thinking stems I believe from the early Catholic church's stance on fornication and adultry. Both of which are sins according to the tenets of that faith. Since the Christians dominated the western world for 1000 years and the spread to the new world it seems only natural that these fundalmentalist views would creep into American law, society and morality. Too bad that the concept of the soul being infused at the moment of creation is now somehow no longer the case since any human cells except RBC can contain DNA and possibly the formation of a human. So when I shave am I sinning? It is time the church had Vatican III in my opinion. These issues need to be addressed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
LudoRephaim Member (Idle past 5114 days) Posts: 651 From: Jareth's labyrinth Joined: |
BTW:
"the risks increase if the girl is very young" Do the risks increase if the mother-to-be is obese or morbidly obese? "The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiroptera Inactive Member |
quote: Nor was it the traditional concept. In the Middle Ages, the first time the mother felt the baby kick was called "quickening", and that was when it was believed that the baby recieved its soul. Hell, read the Torah. If a person killed a real person, there was a procedure to follow to determine whether the killing was intentional murder or an accident. However, if a person caused a woman to miscarry, it was treated as if the person killed another person's chattel. So the idea that a fetus is a human being isn't even Biblical. "Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 442 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
LudoRephaim writes: Hmm, no pro choicer has replied yet. Umm... almost everybody on this thread is pro-choice.
Has the right-wing won this debate, or is this the calm before the storm? If you look at the OP, this debate is about the hypocrisy of the right wing. They claim that abortion is murder, yet it is "okay" in some way if the fetus is the result of rape or incest. They claim that the fetus is a person, yet it is "okay" in some way to kill it if it is the result of rape or incest. Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation. Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: It is clear that many people are ignorant of exactly what "paying" means in connection with "playing". It is also clear that you and other anti-leagal abortion folks hate and mistrust women, especially pregnant women.
quote: Yeah, but many parents don't do that. Let's say little Jenny's and little Tommy's respective parents don't teach them anything about sex. There is no sexual health education available to them in school, either. They are ill-informed, learning about sex from their friends and from movies and TV in a haphazard way, learning a mix of myth and truth. Tommy gets Jenny pregnant even though they thought they were using birth control properly. Jenny decides to have an illegal abortion which is discovered, because there are surveillence cameras all over the place and the FBI has been watching this woman's health clinic for a while ever since abortion became illegal again. Do you hold Jenny's and Tommy's parents liable for the "murder" of the pregnancy, because they failed to communicate the proper knowledge to their children?
quote: OK, one of your suggestions is to keep the kid. Well, let's see, if the mother cannot aford it, are you going to pay for quality day care for the baby while the mother completes school and/or works in order to provide a good life for the child? Oh, wait, conservatives don't like day care because you believe day care damages children and that a parent should raise them. OK, so that means that you must be in favor of supporting the mother to stay home and take care of the child. Oh, hold on, THAT'S no good because that's welfare. Conservatives hate welfare even more than you hate daycare, so that's out. I almost forgot to remind you that carrying a pregnancy to term and giving birth and the recovery afterwards is no walk in the park for a woman's body. People still die from complications due to pregnancy. In fact, people die at a rate 11 times greater from preganacy and childbirth compared to having an abortion. That's not to mention the permenent physical damage that can be done short of death. So, what's your solution, tal?
quote: Except that there are thousands of children right now who are waiting to be adopted and who never will be. They will bounce around from foster home to foster home until they "age out" of the system and are left to fend for themselves. What kind of fantasy world do you live in?
quote: The vast majority of abortions are done long, long before the fetus is anywhere close to being that developed, tal. They are done in the first trimester. D&X procedures are very rare. Perhaps you should read some real statistics instead of getting them from biased wingnut websites.
quote: Er, do you think that married women don't get abortions? Only 8% of women getting abortions used no contraception. 90% of women who have an unplanned pregnancy are using contraception.
quote: One or both of those children are adopted, right? Because it would be hypocritical of you to suggest that people put their unwanted children up for adoption if you aren't going to volunteer to take at least one.
quote: That's dandy for you. My parents told me NOTHING about sex. Not a thing. Luckily, I had at least a decent bit of sex education in health class, but I learned from friends and from reading things myself. It seems you want to encourage ignorance about sex within the population. That is never a good thing. Now, I notice that you overlooked some questions I had for you regarding your views on punitive measures against people who kill fertilized eggs or allow them to die. Please answer them
What about people who take the "Morning After Pill"?
Should we convict them of murder if it can be determined that they housed within their bodies a fertilized egg? Also, should we be collecting and searching the menstrual discharge of all female people, since most fertilized eggs never implant and are expelled to die? What about IUD's? Since they prevent preganacy by preventing implantation, should we outlaw them? I mean, Those fertilized eggs are life, right? Shouldn't we be doing all we can to save it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Sure, it's here. quote: Well, the answer I have for that is that it is clear that this particular anti-legalized abortion supporter considers the person who is pregnant to be not a person with rights, but a piece of meat with value only as an incubator for a fetus.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024