Falsifying Creation

Some interesting bits:"I know that people are much to stubborn to believe a faith. The word faith is what makes it religious. The faith is what saves."That may certainly be the case for your particular religious path. It is not the case for mine. I follow a path of knowledge, not faith."If you really want proof of a creator of some kind, I give you the laws of physics."I agree. I've always thought the second law of thermodynamics (the existance and increase of entropy) implied the extistance of a creator/spritual energy in the universe - however that says nothing about the details of such creator; just on that, great spirit, jehovah and allah are all equally probable."Evolution is fine and dandy, but where did the single celled organism's environment come from. If you want to answer the big bang, then you must also realize that the big bang cannot make something from nothing"If there are multiple universes, then it's possible that 'leakage' from one to another has been the start of many 'big bangs'.DianEdited by newtinmpls, : Apparently things in between << and >> don't get seen.

in response to:"Intelligent design science is far more advanced than evolution science, but it isn't being taught due to fear of punishment by the government."Intelligent design isn't scicence, at least not as I understand it. Science is concerned with 'how' - ID is concerned with 'who' - they are answering different questions.However, I'm all for theology being taught in schools.Dian