quote:
The low risk of exposure is a benefit you receive from the society. Don't you have an implied obligation to contribute your share of providing this benefit by vaccinating your children?
Actually, we have precedents for this. People can usually avoid military conscription if they are conscientious objectors. But in most cases they have to provide service in non-lethal (or at least non-military) occupations.
Also, in this country it is illegal to force people to belong to a union. Yet the nonmembers get the benefit of the union's work at negotiating decent contract providing decent working conditions and benefits. Also, usually it is the union which handles grievances for all the employees. So in most cases, the union members pay the regular union dues that pays for the day-to-day expenses of the union, as well as the costs for the meetings, social events, and other strictly union expenses. However, nonmembers are still obliged to pony up the portion of the expenses that go into negotiating and enforcing the contract.
So, if somehow unvaccinated kids are benefitting unfairly from a cost being borne by the vaccinated kids, I suppose their families could be made to share part of that cost.
Although, I'm not sure what increased cost people are bearing by being vaccinated in a society with unvaccinated people. The vaccinated kids are already being protected and, overall, getting a benefit from vaccination. I suppose in the US people might have to pay for their vaccinations out of their own pockets, or pay higher insurance premiums, and families of unvaccinated kids might be required to pay a little bit into this.
Kings were put to death long before 21 January 1793. But regicides of earlier times and their followers were interested in attacking the person, not the principle, of the king. They wanted another king, and that was all. It never occurred to them that the throne could remain empty forever. -- Albert Camus