Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Having it both ways (Chinese abortion policy & Pro-choice/life considerations)
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 22 of 59 (397480)
04-26-2007 8:23 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by macaroniandcheese
04-21-2007 2:06 PM


Linear Solution, Complex System, Pandora's Box
brennakimi:
in my research, there are no such policies.
Interesting that this topic opened as new reports of forced abortions emerge in Guanxi Provice:
NPR Story
Cases Of Forced Abortions Surface In China : NPR
families were previously only permitted one child (see my explanation in the above post). how they decided to limit their births is up to them.
The government denies supporting 'forced' abortions and sterilisations, true. Coerced abortions and sterilisations by the millions, though, are built into the system. The government does not even bother to deny this.
China observers know the Party's official line is often at odds with reality. Its official disapproval of 'forced' abortions under its rule is no exception. Local officials don't go forcing abortions on women as late as eight or nine months pregnant in the absence of incentive to do so. They belong to the same Party as, and were appointed to their posts by, the same national leaders who say they disapprove.
National Party officials set and enforce quotas--strictly. They aren't very curious about how their provincial officials meet those quotas any more than they are curious about how individual couples do. Figuring out how to cope is a responsibility of those further down the ladder.
For all the official 'disapproval' of forced abortions, journalists who expose the practice get much harsher treatment than the Party officials they expose.
Chen Guangchenn
News: Breaking stories & updates - The Telegraph
however, any higher parity children are not killed, simply taxed.
The exorbitant amount of money families are obliged to pay is not a 'tax.' It is a fine. The family has committed a crime. With that the family's problems only begin.
Children beyond one are denied official recognition in China. They can get no government ID card in a country where nearly all services are socialized. For all but the wealthy that means no education, no housing, no banking, no employment. Until recently it meant no access to health care; today they may be admitted to a hospital upon payment of huge fees. These individuals are completely dependent on their families and communities for support.
The 'one-child-per-family rule' is a classic example of a linear solution imposed on a complex system. The approach has given rise to a host of unintended results that continue to play out. One of them has been noted: the disproportionate number of males to females in the population. A number of social plagues follow from this aspect of it alone.
there have been local abuses, but there is no national policy resembling this draconian suggestion.
'Draconian' is, sadly, a fair description of the whole business.
The China Digital Times (UC-Berkeley) provides an excellent omnibus roundup of news about China. I highly recommend the free e-mail subscription service to those who are interested in following events.
A few links of interest in this discussion:
Main Site
China Digital Times (CDT) - Covering China from Cyberspace
Politics
Politics and oil mix in Russia-China talks - China Digital Times (CDT)
Gender Imbalance
Page not found - China Digital Times (CDT)
See also:
Radio Free Asia: Headline Search 'Forced Abortions'
Search Results forced abortions « Radio Free China
_____
Edited by Archer Opterix, : url.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : typo repair

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by macaroniandcheese, posted 04-21-2007 2:06 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by macaroniandcheese, posted 04-29-2007 10:54 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied
 Message 54 by Archer Opteryx, posted 05-22-2007 6:13 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 32 of 59 (398098)
04-29-2007 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Nuggin
04-27-2007 4:14 PM


Re: Pro-Choice isn't pick and choose
You're misrepresenting the pro-choice argument, Nuggin.
It's not about 'policy.' It's about reproductive choice as a right.
Policies are not rights. Rights exist before policy is made. Rights define the limits of policy.
The word right--as in 'reproductive rights'--is one you have consistently avoided using. But rights are exactly what is being asserted.
Don't take my word for it. Check it out.
Then tell us whether or not you support a right of reproductive choice.
_____

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Nuggin, posted 04-27-2007 4:14 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Nuggin, posted 04-29-2007 1:02 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 37 of 59 (398811)
05-02-2007 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Nuggin
04-29-2007 1:02 PM


Rights for All
Nuggin:
American "rights" are not the same as Chinese "rights". We can not impose our cultural biases on them, nor should we accept their cultural biases imposed on us.
Both the USA and the PRC are member countries of the United Nations. In 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations approved the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as 'a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations.'
You may familiarize yourself with this document here:
http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html
_____

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Nuggin, posted 04-29-2007 1:02 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 9:25 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 38 of 59 (398819)
05-02-2007 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Nuggin
04-27-2007 4:14 PM


Some Parties deserve Pooping
Nuggin:
If they Chinese have a problem with overcrowding and lack of resources and they believe they have a solution, who are we to tell them their solution is wrong?
You have the same right to criticize actions by the Communist Party of China that you have to criticize the Republican Party of the United States.
You are presumably a member of neither group. But what these parties do with the power they hold affects millions of people. It affects you.
It is affecting you now.
And in the case of the Communist Party of China and similar regimes you have a compelling reason to speak out that does not exist in America. The government of China is not elected. It holds power by force. Its prohibitions thus cannot be equated with the will of 'the Chinese,' as you naively assume. Most of these prohibitions would lose in a landslide if China's people were asked.
True liberals care about giving a voice to those who have no voice. Hence the term 'bleeding-heart liberal.' It alludes to the reputation liberals got, somewhere along the line, for caring about someone other than themselves.
You can meet some liberals here.

Human Rights in China
Page not found | Human Rights in China | HRIC
Reporters Without Borders: 2007 China Report
Bienvenue sur le site de Reporters sans frontires | RSF
Amnesty International
Amnesty International
_____

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Nuggin, posted 04-27-2007 4:14 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 9:31 PM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 41 of 59 (398964)
05-03-2007 8:17 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by Nuggin
05-02-2007 9:25 PM


Re: Rights for All
Nuggin:
the PRC's tax laws
You know by now that we are not discussing a 'tax law.'
The issue is government control of reproductive choice.
That control is clearly oppressive and has nurtured a climate of abuse.
If you don't care, just say you don't care.
If Canada, who to the best of my knowledge isn't violating any of the articles, wants to scold the US or China, they at least have the moral authority to do so.
By this logic, I have the moral authority to scold you. I live in Taiwan while you live in the no-account USA. I therefore possess the moral authority that you say you lack.
You are wrong. Shape up.

__________
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Nuggin, posted 05-02-2007 9:25 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Nuggin, posted 05-03-2007 11:17 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 54 of 59 (401784)
05-22-2007 6:13 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Archer Opteryx
04-26-2007 8:23 AM


Reproduction crackdown sparks riots - Guangxi
Offered FYI.
BBC: Riots reported after child fines assessed
BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | China's child fines 'spark riot'
Thousands of villagers have rioted in south-western China over the country's controversial family planning restrictions, reports say.
The villagers, in Guangxi province, reportedly attacked government offices after officials imposed heavy fines on families who had too many children.
The BBC's consistent use of the word fine to describe the financial penalties is worth noting. Having over-quota children is a criminal offence in China, not a 'tax' measure as some have stated here. The BBC is correct.
The article also shows the fines extracted from families to be far in excess of what most citizens can ever pay. The fines are not, like taxes, proportional to income. They are not intended to be.
The story does report a recent change. China's regime still limits 'urban dwellers' to one child but allows rural villagers to have two children 'if the first child is a girl.' This latter exception was introduced to ameliorate the widening gap between the number of males and females in China's young adult population.
_____
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : clarity.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Archer Opteryx, posted 04-26-2007 8:23 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 55 of 59 (402629)
05-29-2007 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Nuggin
05-05-2007 11:26 AM


Re: Please tell me how
Nuggin:
How is it interfering with the woman's right to choose?[...] They have put into effect a series of penalties and incentives which make it financially hard to have more than one child. But that's still a choice.
More accurately, they make it financially devastating to have more than one child.
But you're right---that's such a quibbling little thing to go rioting over. What's a little financial devastation here and there when you retain your freedom to choose?
You'll be pleased to know that China has freedom of speech, too. You can say anything you want.
True, the government has 'penalties and incentives' on certain subjects. If you talk about the Tienanmen Square demonstrations or the invasion of Tibet, you can expect the government to imprison you for years, or execute you and harvest your organs. In the meantime you can expect your family members to be fired from their jobs, denied travel visas, placed under house arrest and have all their conversations monitored until the government feels better about them.
But hey--it's not like the government is rounding up people and cutting out their tongues, is it? Everyone still enjoys freedom of choice. You can say anything you want.
Just stand in the middle of Tienanmen Square and try it.
_____
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Nuggin, posted 05-05-2007 11:26 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Nuggin, posted 05-29-2007 10:19 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3628 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 57 of 59 (402667)
05-29-2007 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Nuggin
05-29-2007 10:19 AM


Re: Please tell me how
Nuggin: You make this sound like the options are a) China is a big meanie, or b) everyone lives in Candyland.
I made it sound like an answer to your question.
You asked how anyone was having their freedom restricted. I showed you.
___
Edited by Archer Opterix, : quotebox.

Archer
All species are transitional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Nuggin, posted 05-29-2007 10:19 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024