Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Having it both ways (Chinese abortion policy & Pro-choice/life considerations)
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 8 of 59 (396646)
04-21-2007 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Hyroglyphx
04-21-2007 10:48 AM


How can anyone who is Pro-Choice speak out against the abortion of a fetus because it seems one sex is being targeted?
Because they're not making a choice; they're having a choice forced on them by government policies and social necessity.
Pro-choice isn't just a slogan, slappy, like the way "pro-life" is. It's an actual description of the fact that we'd prefer women had the free choice about who was able to gestate inside their bodies.
So why the concern only when it seems that one sex is being targeted?
Because it's indicative of the fact that being female is a liability in Chinese society.
And you'll notice that none of the pro-choice feminists who are concerned about this issue say that the solution is to prevent anybody in China from having an abortion. (Go on, I dare you to find someone who's said that.) The proposed solutions eliminate the liability of being female and so eliminate the reasons one would practice sex-selective abortion in the first place.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-21-2007 10:48 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 14 of 59 (397295)
04-25-2007 12:11 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Hyroglyphx
04-25-2007 2:59 AM


Re: It's not really that hard to understand.
How can you in one instance say that a fetus is not a human being at all with no rights available to them, and yet, hypocritically cry foul ball because more female non-humans are being killed at a higher rate than male non-humans? That makes no sense whatsoever.
It makes no sense to you because, again, the woman whom the fetus is inside is completely invisible to you. From your fetus-centric view it doesn't make any sense at all.
From the perspective of the woman and her choices? It makes perfect sense. One is a woman exercising a (relatively) free choice about who is allowed to gestate within her body; the other is coercion making that choice for her.
Learn to see women, NJ, and not just fetuses, and it'll become clear to you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-25-2007 2:59 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 53 of 59 (399421)
05-05-2007 1:45 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Hyroglyphx
05-05-2007 11:07 AM


Re: Conflating the issue
And I suspect that all the floundering I've seen thus far is because my question presents a conundrum for those taking a pro-abortion stance, which is why I'm having a hard time getting a straight up answer.
Who's floundering? I demolished your entire argument back on the first page, on post 8 - and received absolutely no reply. The question is - why are you floundering?
Is it because you still can't see the problem from the perspective of a woman and her ability to make choices about who gets to live inside her uterus?
You are either Pro-abortion or anti-abortion.
That doesn't make any sense. The pro-choice side isn't interested in making women have abortions - they're interested in women being able to choose abortions if that's what's best for them, or not choose abortions, if they don't want to have one. How can that be "pro-abortion"? (It really is impossible for you to imagine women making choices for themselves, isn't it?)
Let's try another formulation. Your side is "pro-forced birth", since your side believes that the state can force women with unwanted pregnancies to give birth to them anyway. Our side is "anti-forced birth." Much clearer, no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Hyroglyphx, posted 05-05-2007 11:07 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 59 of 59 (402784)
05-29-2007 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by nator
05-29-2007 10:52 PM


There is a lot of self-hatred among the female half of a patriarchal and misogynistic society, and right-wing conservative Christianity is nothing if it isn't patriarchal and misogynist.
Not to mention - a whole lot of exceptionalist thinking. Like, "all these other women are tramps and sluts, but my abortion is totally fine, because I have very good reasons and I thought about it a long time."
But you're right, the fact that women are occasionally complicit or even supportive of patriarchy doesn't mean that there's no such thing as patriarchy at all. In fact it's not at all uncommon for disinfranchinsed people to be openly supportive of the systems that disinfranchise them. Like, you know, non-rich Republican voters.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by nator, posted 05-29-2007 10:52 PM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024