|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creationism museum opens in Alberta | |||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Guess that means it is done. Oh, by no means! Again. Have you had the chance to visit the museum?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Should you wish to discuss "all evidences" of "creation" there are over 1000 threads available in "Social and Religious Issues".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
This is some of the biblical related content to what is in the museum. Yes? And?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
I believe the topic has been moved to "Is It Science?" from the "Coffee House" earlier in the thread.
Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Message 125
Maybe address the topic here. I posted an example exhibit from the museum. It was of Jesus risen from the dead. Message 129
Very nice. So, what about the exhibit again? Message 133
If you have something to say about the resurrection exhibit, let us know. Message 136
Like the exhibit picture I included earlier from the museum of the resurrected Christ. That was not limited by science. Messge 141
The exhibits in the museum, including the one at the core of the matter, the resurrection of Jesus, is relevant. Nothing is more relevant. Message 147
while you ignore the exhibit I mentioned. Message 150
The fact also is that the exhibit I talked about, you have not addressed. Let me see if I've got this straight.RAZD: Comment. keys: Oh yeah? I posted a picture of Jesus. jar: Comment. keys: Oh yeah? What about my picture of Jesus? Jaderis: Comment. keys: Oh yeah? You didn't comment on my picture of Jesus. Ad nauseum. OK. I give. keys. I see you've posted a picture of Jesus.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Did he show that the creation, or resurrection was false? OK. Let's start here then. Why don't you lay out "all evidences" that "creation" is true and we can get a discussion going.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
the earth abounds with evidence for a God, and spirits, and supernatural Terrific!Can you give us an example of this "evidence"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
It is high time to put that limited body of understanding firmly in it's little place. Hey guys? I know it's tempting to hammer keys on the science thing but it's pretty plain he'll dodge any science questions. How about we press him to provide something other than his bare assertion that "evidence exists for a god"?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
I simply, then picked an exhibit, and tried to discuss it. You mean "Look! A picture of an empty cave!"?
List 2 known lies in the museum, so we can see what you mean. keys. For the third time. Why don't you point to some "evidence" in the "museum" and discuss why you think it's correct?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
the earth abounds with evidence for a God, and spirits, and supernatural keys. FYI Shifting the burden of proof The burden of proof is always on the person asserting something. Shifting the burden of proof, a special case of Argumentum ad Ignorantiam, is the fallacy of putting the burden of proof on the person who denies or questions the assertion. The source of the fallacy is the assumption that something is true unless proven otherwise. You have asserted that there is evidence of god.The burden of proof is on you. Perhaps something in the "museum" would prove god's existence, hm?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Jesus rose from the dead, that is evidence No. That's a bare assertion. Where's your evidence?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
If you don't, then be consoled with the fact that most of the world does believe in some supernatural. keys. FYI Argumentum ad populum This is known as Appealing to the Gallery or Appealing to the People. You commit this fallacy if you attempt to win acceptance of an assertion by appealing to a large group of people. This form of fallacy is often characterized by emotive language. That's two logical fallacies. Care to offer some evidence? Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
I offered a few exhibits to try and show that more was at issue than just science in these places. Are you referring to this?
And this?
I noticed this exhibit from the creation museum. You noticed an exhibit?That's your evidence? Offer some evidence! Any evidence! And then, on top of everything else, you throw down the gauntlet
List 2 known lies in the museum, so we can see what you mean. and when both RAZD and Rahvin rise to the bait, you dodge with this?
as I actually would like to do that, I am not yet confident of the fairness of the moderators here You just added two fallacies to your list! Argumentum ad nauseam (argument to the point of disgust). The fallacy of trying to prove something by saying it again and again. Of course, it is not fallacious to state the truth again and again; what is fallacious is to expect the repetition alone to substitute for real arguments. Argumentum ad ignorantiam (argument to ignorance). The fallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn't been proven false. Congratulations, keys! That's 4 logical fallacies in the space of less than 10 posts! Care to try for five? Again. keys. You have asserted that there is evidence of god.The burden of proof is on you. You have made the bare assertion that Jesus rose from the dead.The burden of proof is on you. "Look! A picture!" is not evidence."All my friends think so!" is not evidence. I'm beginning to think you don't want to discuss anything. Prove me wrong, keys. I'm begging you. Prove me wrong. Don't want to discuss those icky science questions? Fabulous!Let's stick to jebus. Now.You were saying?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
That's five!
Congratulations, Mr. keys, you've done it! The flood itself I believe, and millions of other as well, really happened. Another bare assertion with no supporting evidence! What has he won, Johnny?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2671 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Number 6!
I do use the bible for some things, yes. One thing it does do is record the resurrection. It talks about the witnessed event. Circulus in demonstrando (circular argument). When someone uses what they are trying to prove as part of the proof of that thing. Number 7!
Ever notice science has changed somewhat since, say, the 1940ies? Red herring. Introducing irrelevant facts or arguments to distract from the question at hand. You know, at this rate, you're going to plow thru all 34 fallacies in the next day or two!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024