From this article or March 2006:
WHOquote:
Global deaths due to measles fell by 48%, from 871 000 in 1999 to an estimated 454 000 in 2004, thanks to major national immunization activities and better access to routine childhood immunization, the agencies said. These measles mortality data, calculated by WHO, are the latest available.
Measles doesn't seem that harmless to me.
Admittedly, measles rates were highest in Africa as you mentioned but the infection and death rates decreased the most in that continent (60% according to the article). Do you think the general nutrition and sanitation increased greatly for 60% of the poor in that 5 years or could it actually be due to the increased vaccination rate among the population?
LindaLou writes:
If someone chooses not to vaccinate, they need to make sure they take steps to live healthily.
And the general sub-Saharan Africa population accomplishes this in what way?
LindaLou writes:
No one knows what injecting...and no studies have been conducted with vaccinated and nonvaccinated populations.
Lets try
This articlequote:
Whooping cough is re-emerging nationwide and youngsters in states that permit parents to easily opt out of vaccinating their children are at increased risk from the disease,...
I guess that study is going on as we speak. Unless you are able to show that those particular states have poorer nutrition levels for their populace or that parents who opt out of vaccinations tend to undernourish their children, I think we can rule out varying nutrition levels as having a profound effect on this particular study.
How about
here in a single town in Indiana. Note that almost all of those infected were unvaccinated.
Of course you are saying that the disease would not cause death if the nutrition of the patient is good. However, you can't rule out that these patients survived because there were good hospitals and doctors around. But what if none of the people in that little Indiana town had been vaccinated. Now how would the medical establishment deal with more than 30% of the population having measles? It is likely that some of those would be health care professionals.
LindaLou writes:
As I have said, the risk is not zero, but it is not zero for vaccination either.
As I am sure you have heard before, this is risk verses benefit problem. Risks to individual and population health are higher if people are unvaccinated than they are if vaccinated. This assessment is supported by numerous studies. Although citing these studies does little to console an individual parent who's child is adversely affected by a vaccination, it is still a good arguing point in support of continuing mandatory vaccinations for children attending public school.