|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
You can take your silly little debate rules and cram them up your ass, cop. Message 40 Would an admin please step in and have a word with CatholicScientist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Nator, I had that exact same thought last night when I read AdminPD's comment.
It's so blatant!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Admins.
Is it true, as RAZD suggests, that "simple" is one and the same with "reversespin"? If so, "reversespin" needs to be banned indefinitely as well.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
I'm afraid we need action in the Logic thread again.
Please. Someone step in and do something with M. Dawn Bertot.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
AdminPD,
I'm afraid your warning has had no effect whatsoever. Dawn continues to post ... "An axiom is a self evident truth." ... to any and all responses. This is unproductive and tiresome. Perhaps a short suspension will change his tune.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Will someone keep an eye on Beretta over at Why Should ID be Taught in Science Class?
He's trying to derail the thread. Again.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
... it is not any way a breach of forum rules to have bad arguments. It's clearly a violation of Rule 4. And while MartinV could be said to have "bad arguments", this Dawn character has no arguments. He simply repeats, ad nauseum, "It's an axiomatic truth." This dude is in serious need of admin action.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
Naw. Don't close it.
But don't youall have a cage for his sort? ... Some kind of "this-is-the-only-thread-this-wingnut-can-post-in" place that I remember somebody mentioning once not too long ago ...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
This would be an argument for re-opening Beretta's thread and directing his misinformation on evolution to that thread and Beretta can use up his own threads with nonsense instead of being off topic on other threads. Is there any hope of this happening?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
An apology at the very least.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
From your recent post:
And you are not a moderator molbiogirl, which means you don't have the luxury to post correcting someone else without also moving the discussion forward. His cut and paste wasn't that lengthy and he doesn't make a habit of it as some do. Please refrain from conversational posts this close to the end of the thread. 1. I did not say that Buz used a lengthy cut and paste. Rule 6 states: "... in your own words". Buz added nothing. 2. The post was not conversational. I admonished Buz for his unceremonious dump of nothing but a cut and paste. And I moved the discussion forward (I pointed to the error of his assumption that a modern cell is equivalent to a proto-cell). In my opinion, you have yet again taken the opportunity to advance a personal agenda as a moderator (and it's not just with me -- you've done this with other participants as well).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
I disagree, so please refrain from similar style of posting in that thread. As I assumed you would. However, Percy said that Buz didn't add anything to the CnP either, so I am not alone in my assessment of the situation.
What personal agenda? If you're going to make accusations, please substantiate them. I (and others) have done so in the past, to no avail. Since you won't cop to your bias, I see no reason to repeat the exercise.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
As you wish.
...and he doesn't make a habit of it as some do. What does this mean?
Nator Message 169 writes: Might you be inappropriately using your Admin status to lean on me, perhaps because you are resentful of what happened to you in the Misunderstanding Empiricism thread? Rrhain Message 121 writes: She asked a question as to what I think she should have done ... Question: Is it possible for an administrator to overreach? Yes or no. If so, then yes, there will be times when an administrator should keep his or her nose out of it. Were I to continue the search in previous versions of the Moderation thread, I have no doubt I would find more. That you have never copped to bias is no surprise. That you are accused of it repeatedly is telling.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
If you read the discussions completely, I think you find that nator did not continue to push the idea that I was retaliating and Rrhain didn't insinuate that I was pushing a personal agenda. The fact that Nator and Rrhain chose to stop beating a dead horse is no surprise. You won't cop to it. Period. As I said before, it is a pointless exercise. You are in denial.
So if you feel I am pushing a personal agenda, please explain what personal agenda I'm pushing. You seem to moderate piddly non issues with people you have strong disagreements with.
Your examples did not show anything except people displeased with an admin action. All admins who actively moderate have them. Yet, some moderators have the grace and humility to admit it when they are wrong. Moose, for example.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
molbiogirl Member (Idle past 2672 days) Posts: 1909 From: MO Joined: |
You've been answered. Whether or not the verdict was to your liking is now immaterial at this point. PD specifically asked me to support my contention that she is biased. I did so.
While I'm sure you'll just throw out the "bias" card, it would be well with you to know that you are in no position to talk about personal bias... I am not a moderator. I can exhibit whatever bias I wish.
... or critique others on lengthy copy and pastes. Unlike some, I provide support for my assertions. And I have been specifically asked by other participants to provide LENGTHIER cites (Jaderis, for example). When you (or Buz), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "lengthy CnPs", I showed you in no uncertain terms that my cites were no more than 3 sentences long in that thread. When you (or Buz), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "not using my own words" to support my position, I pointed out that I had used an average of 128 words per post to buttress my assertions in that thread. When you (or Buz ... it's so hard to keep differentiate between the 2 of you), as a participant in a thread, accused me of "posting bare links", I pointed out that I have not posted nothing but an URL. Ever.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024