IamJoseph writes:
The evidence tended for 5000 years pre-sumerian is laughable.
Why is it laughable? You appear to hand wave away evidence without providing any of your own.
What leads you to doubt the evidence I tender?
IamJoseph writes:
Give a simple name more than 6000 instead`
How about a place name?
Eridu (or Eridug, modern Tell Abu Shahrain, Iraq) was the earliest city in southern Mesopotamia, founded ca. 5400 BC.
Eridu - Wikipedia
IamJoseph writes:
It is also not plausable that an unrecorded 5000 year period, has no transit imprints in that region.
Well I'm sorry, I confess I have no idea what this sentance means if you want something not reliant on writing.
IamJoseph writes:
In fact, there is no evidence of history per se prior to 6000, and all alledged evidences are based on flimsy premises.
Now this is an interesting thing to say don't you think? You have the site of Eridu dated prior to 6000 years ago but as you have said
all evidence is based on a flimsy premis.
This begs the question: why are you on this site? You seem to show talent only in refusing to see what other wiser people have tried really, really hard to show you.
I mean, the surface of the sphere thread: a perfect example. It is obvious to anyone accept you that there is no center. Yet you keep insisting that
everyone else is wrong accept you.
So I ask you: if you are not here to learn or debate, what are you here for?