Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How Do Scientists Believe in God and Evolution?
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5531 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 98 of 145 (469187)
06-04-2008 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by Wumpini
06-04-2008 4:34 AM


The power of faith and the force of gravity
Wumpini writes:
Did Christ walk on water? Yes. Is it scientifically possible? No.
Did Christ raise others from the dead? Yes. Is it scientifically possible? No.
Did Christ feed 1,000's of people with a handful of food? Yes. Is it scientifcally possible? No.
Was there a global flood? Yes. Is it scientifically possible? No.
THIS JUST IN: The power of faith and the force of gravity are two similar things. Gravity can suck light down a black hole and make it dark forever. Faith can suck reason down the drain of true believership and make it unthinkable forever.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Wumpini, posted 06-04-2008 4:34 AM Wumpini has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5531 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 106 of 145 (469388)
06-05-2008 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by Wumpini
06-05-2008 5:28 AM


Re: Evidence
Wumpini writes:
"There is one thing even more vital to science than intelligent methods; and that is, the sincere desire to find out the truth, whatever it may be." - Charles Sanders Pierce.
Wumpini, your signature quote is bogus. Science has nothing whatsoever to do with finding out "the truth."
”HM

The most in comprehensible thing about nature is that it is comprehensible. ”A. Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by Wumpini, posted 06-05-2008 5:28 AM Wumpini has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by Straggler, posted 06-05-2008 12:32 PM Fosdick has replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5531 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 109 of 145 (469401)
06-05-2008 1:01 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by Straggler
06-05-2008 12:32 PM


Re: Truth?
Straggler writes:
At the risk of going well off topic (in which case a new thread might be appropriate) - What is the aim of science in your view if not to describe and understand the "truths" of reality and nature?
Straggler, I'll respond this way and leave it there: Science operates on testable theories and empirical evidence. Faith operates on unquestionable interpretations of "the truths," which are neither testable nor produce empirical evidence.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Straggler, posted 06-05-2008 12:32 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by bluescat48, posted 06-05-2008 1:38 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 115 by Straggler, posted 06-05-2008 3:01 PM Fosdick has not replied

  
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5531 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 114 of 145 (469415)
06-05-2008 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 112 by bluescat48
06-05-2008 1:38 PM


Re: Truth?
bluescat48 writes:
Hoot Mon writes:
Faith operates on unquestionable interpretations of "the truths," which are neither testable nor produce empirical evidence.
Then they are not "truths" but beliefs.
I agree with you. “Truths” are the concern of true believers. The rest of us have to settle for facts. However, I still use the word “true” casually, such as, “It is true that I earn less that $100,000 a year.” But I certainly do not use it this way: “It is true that the only way to heaven is through Jesus Christ.” One is a fact, the other is not.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by bluescat48, posted 06-05-2008 1:38 PM bluescat48 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024