Rrhain writes:
Hoot Mon writes:
What they say they lose from legalizing "gay marriage" may not be reasonable to you.
But what would be lost? You've gone on and on about this, but you have yet to come up with a single example of anything that would be lost.
How does your neighbor's marriage affect you? Does your marginal tax rate go up? Are they then granted an easement? You now have to park on alternate sides of the street every other Thursday? You'll immediately be deported?
Suppose Mr. and Mrs. Smith out in Iowa are sitting on their front porch and feeling very distraught about their son's recent announcement that he's gay and he wants to marry Clifford, the next door neighbor's son. You stop to help them out by telling them that they are immoral and have no good reason to feel that way. In fact, you tell them they ought to be ashamed of themselves for being so close-minded, selfish, and stupid.
And then you say, "What's the matter with you people, anyway? You're acting like a couple of degenerate heterosexual bigots."
Mrs. Smith slowly raises her head from her knees and says, "You better get your queer ass back on out that Hershey Highway, son, before I get out my pig sticker. What right do you have to tell me what is moral and what is not?"
Rrhain, you need to explain why, in the case of "same-sex marriage," a minority can be more moral than a majority. So far all we get from you are your passionate opinions. If you could come down from your self-righteous perch and touch the ground of reality you would know that gravity and marriage are two things that most people regard as being purely NATURAL. Gravity doesn't pull up and marriage doesn't unit two members of the same sex. I've got a lot of empirical evidence on that to show you. You got nuthin' but opinion.
”HM
Edited by Hoot Mon, : fussing