Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Cali Supreme Court ruling on legality of same-sex marriage ban
Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 385 of 448 (470107)
06-09-2008 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 384 by FliesOnly
06-09-2008 1:42 PM


Re: What about same-sex polygamy?
FO writes:
Do you see now? I am not comparing the two groups. I am not saying "homosexuals are facing the same problems in this Country that were once faced by Blacks.
...ah...you're not? What am I missing here?
Here's the logical construction: A is not a comparison to B, therefore A is like B.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 384 by FliesOnly, posted 06-09-2008 1:42 PM FliesOnly has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 386 by NosyNed, posted 06-09-2008 2:05 PM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 388 of 448 (470114)
06-09-2008 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 386 by NosyNed
06-09-2008 2:05 PM


Re: The comparison
OK, you win by differentiating arguments from groups. But no matter how you look at these arguments there is an implication that “same-sex marriage” and mixed-race marriage should be comparable in the context of a legal contract. I think it is disingenuous for those who make such comparisons to claim they have no intention of likening the plight of blacks with that of gays.
What about the plight of heterosexual married people who feel their institution is threatened by the gay-power movement, which claims to be the successor of the black-power movement? Mr. and Mrs. Smith out in Iowa are very confused about such power movements, especially when they are told that any heterosexual-power movement would be a highly bigoted affair.
”HM
Edited by Hoot Mon, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 386 by NosyNed, posted 06-09-2008 2:05 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 389 by bluescat48, posted 06-09-2008 3:34 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 405 by Rrhain, posted 06-10-2008 7:31 AM Fosdick has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 394 of 448 (470168)
06-09-2008 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 389 by bluescat48
06-09-2008 3:34 PM


Re: The comparison
bluescat48 writes:
Why would their institution be threatened. They would still be married under the law only the law would extend to previously denied couples. I still cannot see what the difference would be or why heterosexual couples would lose anything if homosexual couples could marry.
You would have to ask them, not me. But I believe that's how they feel, whether or not you like their feelings. What they say they lose from legalizing "gay marriage" may not be reasonable to you. But it's still what they feel. The only way to settle this "gay marriage" issue is have a referendum on it and let people vote.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by bluescat48, posted 06-09-2008 3:34 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 408 by Rrhain, posted 06-10-2008 7:54 AM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 410 of 448 (470253)
06-10-2008 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 406 by Rrhain
06-10-2008 7:36 AM


The moral authority of a bigot
Rrhain writes:
Nem Jug writes:
If a person who doesn't agree with your view is a bigot on those pretenses, then what does that make you?
Morally correct.
Isn't that the attitude of a bigot? Where do you get your moral authority, bigot?
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 406 by Rrhain, posted 06-10-2008 7:36 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 421 by Rrhain, posted 06-11-2008 1:24 AM Fosdick has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 411 of 448 (470258)
06-10-2008 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 408 by Rrhain
06-10-2008 7:54 AM


Nuthin' but opinion
Rrhain writes:
Hoot Mon writes:
What they say they lose from legalizing "gay marriage" may not be reasonable to you.
But what would be lost? You've gone on and on about this, but you have yet to come up with a single example of anything that would be lost. How does your neighbor's marriage affect you? Does your marginal tax rate go up? Are they then granted an easement? You now have to park on alternate sides of the street every other Thursday? You'll immediately be deported?
Suppose Mr. and Mrs. Smith out in Iowa are sitting on their front porch and feeling very distraught about their son's recent announcement that he's gay and he wants to marry Clifford, the next door neighbor's son. You stop to help them out by telling them that they are immoral and have no good reason to feel that way. In fact, you tell them they ought to be ashamed of themselves for being so close-minded, selfish, and stupid.
And then you say, "What's the matter with you people, anyway? You're acting like a couple of degenerate heterosexual bigots."
Mrs. Smith slowly raises her head from her knees and says, "You better get your queer ass back on out that Hershey Highway, son, before I get out my pig sticker. What right do you have to tell me what is moral and what is not?"
Rrhain, you need to explain why, in the case of "same-sex marriage," a minority can be more moral than a majority. So far all we get from you are your passionate opinions. If you could come down from your self-righteous perch and touch the ground of reality you would know that gravity and marriage are two things that most people regard as being purely NATURAL. Gravity doesn't pull up and marriage doesn't unit two members of the same sex. I've got a lot of empirical evidence on that to show you. You got nuthin' but opinion.
”HM
Edited by Hoot Mon, : fussing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 408 by Rrhain, posted 06-10-2008 7:54 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 413 by FliesOnly, posted 06-10-2008 2:44 PM Fosdick has replied
 Message 422 by Rrhain, posted 06-11-2008 1:48 AM Fosdick has replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 414 of 448 (470292)
06-10-2008 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 413 by FliesOnly
06-10-2008 2:44 PM


Re: Nuthin' but opinion
FO writes:
But we're not talking about morals.
Your side of the argument most certainly is. Take a look at Message 410. Rrhain claims he's:
Morally correct.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 413 by FliesOnly, posted 06-10-2008 2:44 PM FliesOnly has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 418 of 448 (470318)
06-10-2008 4:35 PM
Reply to: Message 416 by bluescat48
06-10-2008 4:02 PM


Re: Nuthin' but opinion
bluescat48 writes:
Bigotry is the same no matter what group is being discriminated against solely buy perceived differences.
Then I suppose men discriminate against women, and vice versa, in public restrooms.
Really, bluescat, this bigotry/discrimination thing has gone too far. At our ages we ought to be more worried about discrimination against the elderly who wouldn't know a Hershey Highway from a hot fudge sundae.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 416 by bluescat48, posted 06-10-2008 4:02 PM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 419 by bluescat48, posted 06-10-2008 5:05 PM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 424 by Rrhain, posted 06-11-2008 2:11 AM Fosdick has not replied
 Message 426 by Taz, posted 06-11-2008 2:58 AM Fosdick has not replied

Fosdick 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5529 days)
Posts: 1793
From: Upper Slobovia
Joined: 12-11-2006


Message 444 of 448 (470563)
06-11-2008 11:06 AM
Reply to: Message 422 by Rrhain
06-11-2008 1:48 AM


Sticking up for gays and bums
Rrhain writes:
I note the assumption you have made that I am gay. Is there a particular reason you have ascribed a sexual orientation to me? I know I haven't mentioned it. And note, I am still not mentioning it even now. Rest assured that you don't know me from Adam and such assumptions you make are simply that.
I have made no such assumptions. But rest assured that if you were attacked by real bigots up on Capitol Hill in Seattle”the designated gay haunt”I would bust my knuckles to protect you. I'm not out to do anything to gays except keep their "marriages" out of the law. Neither one of us has moral authority over the other on this issue. And neither one of us should be accusing the other of bigotry. We are only debating opinions here. And my opinion seems to have the weight of consensus, for whatever that's worth.
You should have such a "bigot" as me to be your adversary. Would a bigot punch out a skinhead to save a queer? I've already pushed one skinhead up against the wall in Pioneer Square for pissing on a homeless person.
”HM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 422 by Rrhain, posted 06-11-2008 1:48 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 445 by dawkinsisNOTGod, posted 06-11-2008 11:09 AM Fosdick has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024