Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gay Marriage
Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 200 of 519 (472364)
06-21-2008 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by Fosdick
06-21-2008 9:34 PM


Re: Blather
Hoot writes:
Rrhain writes:
Gays don't have the right not to be tortured because they are gay, but torturing someone because of race is called "lynching" and is illegal.
Yeesh!
Hoot, I know some people that were sent to these camps and had to go through some of the procedures that Rrhain mentioned. Very unpleasant experiences.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Fosdick, posted 06-21-2008 9:34 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Fosdick, posted 06-22-2008 12:54 PM Taz has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 288 of 519 (472655)
06-23-2008 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 287 by Fosdick
06-23-2008 8:35 PM


Re: So much bigotry
Hoot, why do you keep answering people in a smart-ass, wise-guy manner?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 287 by Fosdick, posted 06-23-2008 8:35 PM Fosdick has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 352 of 519 (472989)
06-26-2008 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 348 by Buzsaw
06-26-2008 9:21 AM


Muahahahaha, Buz. I hope your congregation got a good laugh out of your joke there.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by Buzsaw, posted 06-26-2008 9:21 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 362 of 519 (473024)
06-26-2008 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 361 by NOT JULIUS
06-26-2008 3:01 PM


Re: Civil Marriage is About Property
I'm just curious. Since "natural law" obviously is against people in space, are you against the space program?

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by NOT JULIUS, posted 06-26-2008 3:01 PM NOT JULIUS has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 364 by NOT JULIUS, posted 06-26-2008 3:21 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 366 of 519 (473035)
06-26-2008 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 364 by NOT JULIUS
06-26-2008 3:21 PM


Re: Civil Marriage is About Property
Great J writes:
The urge to explore and exploit space for economic reason is not against natural law.
You've overriden the physical limitations of the "natural law" of space dwelling with a purely human desire. Based on this logic, one could also argue that the urge to seek out a life-long companionship with someone you are physically attracted to is not against natural law.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 364 by NOT JULIUS, posted 06-26-2008 3:21 PM NOT JULIUS has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 368 by NOT JULIUS, posted 06-26-2008 5:29 PM Taz has replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 376 of 519 (473084)
06-26-2008 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 368 by NOT JULIUS
06-26-2008 5:29 PM


Re: Civil Marriage is About Property
Great J writes:
Human desires--such as exploration and exploitation--if not harmful are not against natural law.
Then you must really be against the space program. It is a very dangerous thing to send a man into space. When disaster strikes, there is almost zero chance the people could be rescued. This is not to mention the countless people that died during the early stages of the space programs of both the Soviet and the States.
On the other hand, male to male or female to female relationships goes against their very anatomy.
Ok, let's suppose that these goes against their anatomy. Can you perhaps tell us how their physical activities could be harmful? That is, after all, the basis of your entire argument.

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 368 by NOT JULIUS, posted 06-26-2008 5:29 PM NOT JULIUS has not replied

Taz
Member (Idle past 3322 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 377 of 519 (473085)
06-26-2008 11:04 PM
Reply to: Message 370 by New Cat's Eye
06-26-2008 5:45 PM


Re: Civil Marriage is About Property
CS writes:
I just wanted to let you know that you are making a horrible argument.
Haha, what's the matter, don't like being second worst?

I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 370 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-26-2008 5:45 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024