Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anything Divine in the Bible?
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3131 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 151 of 406 (490680)
12-07-2008 8:27 AM
Reply to: Message 140 by Buzsaw
12-06-2008 11:08 PM


Re: The golden rule
The reality is that most Eastern, Pagan and secularist cultures as well as the RCC have a poor track record of implementing the Golden Rule, especially when it comes to outsiders who wish to practice in nations where their culture is the majority.
I have to agree with Coragyps on this as well. Here are just a few atrocities committed by the Christian culture and by Christians in the name of Christ:
#1 The Crusades in which millions of Muslims, Jews, and other ethnic and religious groups were needlessly slaughtered and enslaved by the Christian crusaders in the name of Jesus Christ.
#2 Forcibly converting the Jews and other non-Christians in Europe sometimes to the point of death i.e. beheading, burning at the stake, torture, etc. (i.e. read Martin Luther's On the Jews and their Lies for a start.).
#3 The American Indians were systematically slaughtered in the name of manifest destiny
etc, etc, etc
In no way am I saying that Christians are the only guilty party. Like I have said in a previous post, almost all ethnicities and religions have been on the receiving and sending end of human atrocities and downright hate and meanness. For example, many people don't realize that many of the African slaves were sold to the Europeans by some of other African slavers who worked hand in hand with the European slavers. However in no way does this excuse the Christians societies at that time for condoning slavery or any other atrocities.
My own personal view is that not all the atrocities done by Christians in the name of Christ are a reflection on Christianity as taught by Jesus Christ and in a like manner so too Joseph Stalin's ethnic cleaning or push of communism is not a reflection on atheism. You can't have it both ways. We need to separate the religious teachings from the fallible humans who enact them. Many religions (or lack of religious belief) are many times (not all the time) unjustly blamed for the actions of the people who follow them. Much of the impetus behind why these people committed these atrocities was not primarily because of religion, rather it was from outright greed and political power over other human beings. They used religion (or lack of) to attempt to rationalize and back up their actions whether it be Christian or atheism or everything in between.
So to be totally honest, virtually no societies track record whether it be Christian or non-Christian has ever come close to fully implementing the golden rule. And no the golden rule is not solely a Christian concept as I pointed out in a previous post: Message 58. It was written down by the likes of Buddha and others over 500 years before the birth of Jesus.
Here are a few that predate Jesus teaching of the Golden Rule:
Buddhism writes:
A disciple then knowing [the law] should refrain from stealing anything at any place; should not cause another to steal anything, [2] should not consent to the acts of those who steal anything, should avoid every kind of theft. (Dhammika Sutta, v. 20)
Buddhism writes:
Hurt not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful. (Udana-Varga 5:18)
Buddhism dates back to the 6th century B.C., it is difficult to trace the exact transcription of the Udana-Varga which has been copied down from generation to generation by different schools of Buddhism for over 2500 years.
Ancient Egyptian writes:
Do for one who may do for you, that you may cause him thus to do.
TheTale of the Eloquent Peasant, 109 - 110 was translated by R.B. Parkinson dating to 1970 to 1640 BC.
Hinduism writes:
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you. (Mahabharata 5:1517)
Hinduism clearly predates Christianity by over 800 years. The earliest surviving Sanskrit manuscript copy dates back to the 1st century A.D.
Taoism writes:
Regard your neighbor's gain as your own gain, and your neighbor's loss as your own loss. (T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien)
and
Taoism writes:
The sage has no interest of his own, but takes the interests of the people as his own. He is kind to the kind; he is also kind to the unkind: for Virtue is kind. He is faithful to the faithful; he is also faithful to the unfaithful: for Virtue is faithful. (Tao Teh Ching)
The earliest copies of the Tao Teh Ching, the principle scripture of the Daoist (or Taoist) religion dates to about 300 B.C.
Zoroasterism writes:
That nature alone is good which refrains from doing unto another whatsoever is not good for itself. Dadistan-i-dinik 94:5
also
Zoroasterism writes:
Whatever is disagreeable to yourself do not do unto others. (Shayast-na-Shayast 13:29)
Zoroasterism is an off shoot of the earlier Babylonian and Persian religions and earliest writings dates to about 500 B.C.- roughly the same time much of the OT was written down during Israel's occupation and captivity by Babylonia and Persia (hmm, what a coincidence).
It is of my opinion that the golden rule is an altruistic axiom that translates across the entire human spectrum to all religions, races and ethnicities. No one religion (or lack thereof) holds a corner (or a clean track record i.e. history) on altruism (or barbaric) behavior.
It is the Christian fundamentalists such as the Voice of The Martyrs, Franklin Graham's Samaritan's Purse, the Salvation Army and Christian missions etc by and large who are benevolent helpers of the destitute both in our nation and abroad. This, imo, is where the rubber meets the road relative to a divinely inspired Golden Rule as per what Jesus the Christ and his apostles advocated.
Yeah right, no other ethnic group or religion does any charity work. I raise the BS flag:
Buddhism (just a few):
Buddhist Peace Fellowship - http://www.bpf.org
The Buddhist Peace Fellowship, founded in 1978, brings together Buddhist teachings with progressive social action. Programs include peace and justice work, prison work, Buddhist Alliance for Social Engagement, and the magazine Turning Wheel.
The Karuna Trust - Karuna Trust
UK based Buddhist organization that has education, health and cultural projects for poor people in India of any religion. Also helps fund Buddhist activities.
Tzu-Chi Foundation: Northern California Chapter - http://sanjose.tzuchi.org/
The Buddhist Compassion Relief, Tzu-Chi Foundation is a non-profit organization whose objective is to provide charity, medical treatment, educational development, and cultural promotion to the needy and the society worldwide
Amida Trust - Amida Trust | Supporting Pure Land Buddhism
Features group gathering a corps of people seriously interested in developing humanitarian projects on Buddhist principles to help overcome suffering in the world.
Multicultural Buddhists for Peace - HugeDomains.com
Buddhist people of color multicultural interfaith message board and speakers bureau sponsoring diversity in the heart of Americans to achieve peace, religious tolerance, heal racism, end violence, and alleviate poverty.
Rokpa USA - http://www.rokpausa.org/
Works in the areas of basic and further education, health care, relief of hunger, preservation of culture, self-help and ecology.
Himalayan Kingdom Foundation Trust - http://www.hkft.org/
A private non-profit organization based in Nepal, sponsoring projects marketing Nepali goods to benefit the educational, social, medical, artistic and spiritual needs of the Nepalese people.
Islam:
A Grain of Hope Foundation, Inc. - Islamic organization. Provides assistance to those unable to help themselves, both in the U.S. and abroad.
Helping Hand USA - A global humanitarian relief and development organization; information about their programs, newsletters, reports, and contact details.
Human Appeal - Palestine - A licensed charity working with deprived families in Palestinian society. Includes information about their programs, and photos. [Arabic and English]
Humanitarian Assistance for the Women and Children of Afghanistan (HAWCA) - Information about their health, education and training programs in Afghanistan; also includes background on the country, and details of their fundraising.
The Islamic-American Zakat Foundation - A tax-exempt religious and charitable organization whose primary objective is to serve poor and needy Muslims in the United States. Information about their work and appeals for donations.
Small Kindness - A UK registered charity established by Yusuf Islam. Promotes community development with relief and educational programs to peoples ravaged by war and conflict. Information about programs, appeals and beneficiaries.
Or how about individual non-religious and atheist philanthropists like Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and Robert Williams who have given literally billions of dollars to charities throughout the world?
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Dr. Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by Buzsaw, posted 12-06-2008 11:08 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by NosyNed, posted 12-07-2008 9:41 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 152 of 406 (490685)
12-07-2008 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by DevilsAdvocate
12-07-2008 8:27 AM


The golden rule not altruistic
It is of my opinion that the golden rule is an altruistic axiom that translates across the entire human spectrum to all religions, races and ethenicities. No one religion (or lack thereof) holds a corner (or a clean track record i.e. history) on altruism (or barbaric) behavior.
I disagree. The GR is a simple statement of a rationally thought out approach to protecting the society that I depend on. The reasons for wanting to follow it are not altruistic. That it seems to appear in all societies is, IMO, a symptom of our being social animals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 12-07-2008 8:27 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 154 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 9:47 AM NosyNed has not replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 153 of 406 (490686)
12-07-2008 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by cavediver
12-07-2008 4:57 AM


Re: read again
CD writes:
I see prefectly. By alien, you are obviously referring to the Christian crusaders carrying out their pogrom, the Christian pioneers carrying out their pogrom, the Christian conquistadors carrying out their pogrom. Yes, I'm sure the inhabitants of Istanbul, North America, South America felt their reality of ethics shattered by these murderous aliens.
Or anyone that thinks God should go f... himself, yeah your correct about the above individuals, if there is some absolute standard, and you would be right there along with them. Respect and dignity for others would require you to make a formal apology here for that comment, lets see if you are man enough, or women depending on who and what you are.
By what standard are you evaluating the above peoples actions. Set it out and watch it fall, unless you are agreeing to an absolute standard or right and wrong. You have no right to condemn these people. They are doing what they thought was right in thier view. The same way you tell God to go f... himself. Were you wrong for doing this?
This is so simple, I cannot believe you cannot grasp it. Morality and ethics have evolved at a social level for the simple reason that they are beneficial to that social grouping. Unconstructive social behaviour (theft, violence, eating each other) is discouraged as it is not socially beneficial. When two different societies meet, there could well be a complete clash of ideals leading to conflict and the stronger society may well end up annihilating the weaker society. However, over time it is realised that absorbing the weaker society may well be more beneficial, especially if the difference between the societies is not so great. After even more time, it is realised that joining with the other society creates the largest benefits. If any of this were true, we would see this behaviour throughout history. Hmmm...
I agree it is simple enough, however you and Ned keep ignoring the fact that, it does not matter what a group of people do or what they decide over a period of time, for any reason. I have already agreed to this point. However, if there is no absolute morality then its all just STUFF people are doing and anyone that chooses not to particapate or believe you are wrong or incorrect, is not unwarrented for doing so.
And you are not justified in calling anyones actions evil, unjust, bad or whatever other term you want to throw at it.
So, does absolute morality exist? Is there a standard of right and wrong that is the authority? When you answer this question, then you put yourself in one of only two possible categories.
If space aliens descend upon the earth, we will defend ourselves - not because they are "evil", not because this planet is ours by God-given right, but simply to defend our society, as we have done for the past several million years, whether at the level of the pack, the tribe, the village, the town, the city-state, the country, the allied-pack, or the entire world.
So then God is not evil for his actions. If he aliens are not then why is God. Do you understand his reasons for doing the things mentioned in the scriptures? You avoided what I was saying. My reference was not about the people of the earth primarily but the aliens, now you say they are not evil, even thought they are committing acts of murder against this little planet and remember they could care less about you or your way of thinking. So they are not evil but God with his eternal perspective is?
D Bertot
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 4:57 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 155 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:19 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 154 of 406 (490688)
12-07-2008 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by NosyNed
12-07-2008 9:41 AM


Re: The golden rule not altruistic
DA writes:
It is of my opinion that the golden rule is an altruistic axiom that translates across the entire human spectrum to all religions, races and ethenicities. No one religion (or lack thereof) holds a corner (or a clean track record i.e. history) on altruism (or barbaric) behavior.
Ned writes:
I disagree. The GR is a simple statement of a rationally thought out approach to protecting the society that I depend on. The reasons for wanting to follow it are not altruistic. That it seems to appear in all societies is, IMO, a symptom of our being social animals.
Now this is exacally what I am talking about. Two people that disagree on what and where a simple ethic came form and what it constitutes. If someone comes and doesnt like the principle at all and feels no compulsion to abide by it, like alot dont, are they wrong. They are not if there is no standard. So then I repeat, by what standard do Brian and CD condemn others or God for thier actions.
D Bertot
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by NosyNed, posted 12-07-2008 9:41 AM NosyNed has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 155 of 406 (490690)
12-07-2008 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 9:42 AM


Let's spell this out...
Respect and dignity for others would require you to make a formal apology here for that comment
Bertot, you wouldn't know respect and dignity of you were drowning in it. Apologise for insulting a god who thinks that stoning children is a good idea, because he has an 'eternal' perspective? you are jesting again, right? I can see you being the first to throw the stone, with a grin of delight on your face as you are following your god's will. Excellent, that first stone hit the eight year old square in the face - pulped his nose. Listen to him scream - ha, that will teach his uncle to steal from almighty god. Shit, you missed - try again... Oh, wow, did you see that. You caved half his skull in with that one. That's some right hander. Ugh, white stuff is leaking out that hole now. Quite disgusting. Hit him again and hopefully he'll stop screaming. Yeah, that's it. Let's pick another one, he'll die soon enough. Oh look, that girl must be about twelve (looks a bit like your daughter) - come on, let's sing to god while we watch her die i n agony.
You are a sick fuck, Bertot. If morality comes from this god, then I will define my morality as being diametrically opposite.
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 9:42 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:29 AM cavediver has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 156 of 406 (490691)
12-07-2008 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by cavediver
12-07-2008 10:19 AM


Re: read again
CD writes:
Bertot, you wouldn't know respect and dignity of you were drowning in it. Apologise for insulting a god who thinks that stoning children is a good idea, because he has an 'eternal' perspective? you are jesting again, right?
I would recognize it if there were a standard, is there a standard CD? Are you afraid to answer the question because it will put you in a bind, I think as much.
So whos actions in this instance are correct, yours or Gods? His for stoning someone or yours for telling your creator to go f... himself, or, are niether of you wrong? You see your problem its just that you are not man enough to own up to it.
You are a sick fuck, Bertot. If morality comes from this god, then I will define my morality as being diametrically opposite.
Now your getting it my friend, you dont have a clue what a standard of morality is without God and an absolute standard. Thanks for demonstrating my point, yet again. Your own words, examples and concepts and your inability to think clearly, betray you CD
D Bertot
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:19 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 157 by Huntard, posted 12-07-2008 10:34 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 158 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:36 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2325 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 157 of 406 (490692)
12-07-2008 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:29 AM


Re: read again
Bertot writes:
So whos actions in this instance are correct, yours or Gods? His for stoning someone or yours for telling your creator to go f... himself, or are niether of you wrong? You see your problem you are not man enough to own up to it.
Let me just ask this, if your god ordered you to stone an entire family to death, because one member of that family said to god "go fuck yourself" would you do it? I wouldn't, I would tell god to "go fuck himself".

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:29 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:48 AM Huntard has replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 158 of 406 (490693)
12-07-2008 10:36 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:29 AM


Re: read again
Now your getting it my friend, you dont have a clue what a standard of morality is without God.
yes, according to you, good is stoning children, good is raping and pillaging your way into a 'promised' land. Is this your god's morality? Is this the morality upon which you say our sense of right and wrong is based? And his way is the RIGHT way??? Fucking hell, Bertot, can you listen to yourself?
for telling your creator to go f... himself
He's not my creator, Bertot, he's your imaginary creator. The sad fact is the sickness is not in god, it is in YOUR head. When we hear of past records of this inhumanity, or when we see it occuring today in Somalia, we shake our heads at the travesty and put it down to unprogressed cultural thinking. But what is your excuse?
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:29 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:56 AM cavediver has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 159 of 406 (490694)
12-07-2008 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 157 by Huntard
12-07-2008 10:34 AM


Re: read again
Let me just ask this, if your god ordered you to stone an entire family to death, because one member of that family said to god "go fuck yourself" would you do it? I wouldn't, I would tell god to "go fuck himself".
Like CD, you think avoiding the question and providing examples will help your case, it wont. Let me ask this. Is there an absolute standard of right and wrong. Yes or no.
Why would you tell God to go f himself, because you dont like the standard?
Would you tell the Bear to go f... himself for tearing off the head of a deer. You are in a situation from whaich you cannot extricate yourself and you know it.
D Bertot

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Huntard, posted 12-07-2008 10:34 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Huntard, posted 12-07-2008 10:55 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 162 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:57 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
 Message 169 by Coragyps, posted 12-07-2008 11:12 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 171 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 11:47 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2325 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 160 of 406 (490695)
12-07-2008 10:55 AM
Reply to: Message 159 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:48 AM


Re: read again
Bertot writes:
Like CD, you think avoiding the question and providing examples will help your case, it wont. Let me ask this. Is there an absolute standard of right and wrong. Yes or no.
No. I answered your question, now please answer mine.
Why would you tell God to go f himself, because you dont like the standard?
There is no standard. And , yes, I don't like what he asks me to do, so I don't.
Would you tell the Bear to go f... himself for tearing off the head of a deer.
No, why would I? I don't view that action as morally wrong.
You are in a situation from whaich you cannot extricate yourself and you know it.
No, I'm not.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:48 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 11:05 AM Huntard has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 161 of 406 (490696)
12-07-2008 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by cavediver
12-07-2008 10:36 AM


Re: read again
CD wrties:
yes, according to you, good is stoning children, good is raping and pillaging your way into a 'promised' land. Is this your god's morality? Is this the morality upon which you say our sense of right and wrong is based? And his way is the RIGHT way??? Fucking hell, Bertot, can you listen to yourself?
You remind me of a Calvinist pointing to one verse of scriture about a topic, implying that that is all the scriptures have to say on a topic, forgetting all the other applicable verses.
CD, accusing me of a bad morality, is not the same as answering the question as to whether an standard of absolute morality exists in the first place. Does it yes or no?
You are implying that aleast some morality exists, could it be considered absolute, yes or no?
He's not my creator, Bertot, he's your imaginary creator. The sad fact is the sickness is not in god, it is in YOUR head. When we hear of past records of this inhumanity, or when we see it occuring today in Somalia, we shake our heads at the travesty and put it down to unprogressed cultural thinking. But what is your excuse?
What inhumanity? How did you decide this was inhuman? Why does the term inhuman differ from a bear tearing a deers head off. Come on CD, you can do better than thins. So pain is measured by the level of intelligence. So the deer feels no pain because his intelligence level is lower than ours and the bear feels no shame for the same reason, correct? CD your falling behind fast, better hurry.
D Bertot
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:36 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:58 AM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 165 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 11:03 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied
 Message 175 by Straggler, posted 12-07-2008 12:29 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 162 of 406 (490697)
12-07-2008 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 159 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:48 AM


Re: read again
Bertot, you have asked me to apologise for telling your god to go fuck himself. And you have defended your god for his ordering of children to be stoned.
So in your god-given morality, it is unacceptable to tell god to go fuck himself, but is acceptable to stone children to death, given the right circumstances.
Good, got it now. We're really building up a strong picture of your religion and your thinking. This is really helping. Thank you.
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:48 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 163 of 406 (490698)
12-07-2008 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:56 AM


Re: read again
CD your falling behind fast, better hurry.
If it keeps me and my loved ones away from your fucked up thinking, then all the better...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:56 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 11:01 AM cavediver has replied

Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 112 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 164 of 406 (490699)
12-07-2008 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 163 by cavediver
12-07-2008 10:58 AM


Re: read again
If it keeps me and my loved ones away from your fucked up thinking, then all the better...[
I will accept your refusal to answer the main question as a defeat, not that I am looking to win a debate, but to demonstrate that without God, everything is chaos and meaningless drivel, for all intents and purposes. See you around the website. Im off to work.
D Bertot
Edited by Bertot, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 10:58 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by cavediver, posted 12-07-2008 11:08 AM Dawn Bertot has replied

cavediver
Member (Idle past 3673 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 165 of 406 (490700)
12-07-2008 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Dawn Bertot
12-07-2008 10:56 AM


Re: read again
CD, accusing me of a bad morality, is not the same as answering the question as to whether an standard of absolute morality exists in the first place. Does it yes or no?
No, of course not. How many times?
You are implying that aleast some morality exists, could it be considered absolute, yes or no?
No, it cannot be considered absolute, what-so-ever. I am a social creature and my morality comes from my social environment. And my society has decided that you are a sick twisted individual, best avoided. You live in a Christian community where your beliefs are common and are considered differently. Is this hard to understand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-07-2008 10:56 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024