"Rrhain" writes:
When it stops being legal to torture gay people specifically and purposefully because they are gay, then you might have a point.
This is pure hyperbola, with hysteria thrown in for special effects. (If I ever saw a gay person being legally tortured for being gay I would jump in and fight to defend that gay person, unless he deserved it, which is possible.)
If it's a crap argument when applied to race, why does it suddenly gain legitimacy when applied to sexual orientation?
Ah, Mr. Rocket Scientist, "crap" is a noun. Don't you want to use the adjective "crappy" to express your wingnut opinion?
Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.
Rrhain, I'm sorry your paper was rejected from
Science, but your signature is so old it smells a little, ah, crappy.