RAZD writes:
My position is simple: science and logic can only get you so far, in finding the "ultimate answer to the questions of life, the universe and (oh) everything" -
I agree entirely.
RAZD writes:
and that when you exceed that boundary you cannot claim to be correct or right ... or logical.
Which is a good reason not to exceed it. Instead, you say, with honesty: "I do not know the ultimate answer to to the questions of life, the universe, and everything, or even if there is such a thing". Simple.
RAZD writes:
No matter how hard you try you will never derive or deduct a real answer, rather that what you will get is a conclusion consistent with your world view. You will, of course, also conclude that your answer is logical and rational.
One doesn't need to try to answer unanswerable questions. By definition, it's a rather pointless passtime, don't you think?
My "world view" is that honesty is the best policy, and that this thing called Faith is unnecessary, and fundamentally dishonest.
However, if you're going to have Faith, I'd recommend the number 42, as it's as good as anything else.