Beretta writes:
Well considering that most of the basic body plans that exist appeared in about 3 minutes in the 11th hour geologically speaking (in the Cambrian)I remain unconvinced.
Really? would you mind pointing out to me where in cambrian we can find the "body plan" for a:
Horse
Cat
Dog
Bird
Shark
Giraffe
Elephant
etc....
So, where are all these "basic body plans" then? No way? evolution you say?
Since radiometric dating is the only dating technique that lends any credence to the vast ages required for hypothetical macroevolution to have happened and is far from reliable and since remains of C14 that should be gone from all the 'old' rock layers still persists in measurable quantities (otherwise named "contamination" by those who 'know' that it should not be there) - I find it a somewhat tall tale at best.
You're wrong, there are numerous threads here that deal with this, and every time it has been pointed out that radiometric dating is very reliable.
Besides I still struggle to imagine how my brain could have evolved randomly.
Fortunately, your understanding of something is not a criteria for it being true.
As for alternatives, I opt for the Word of God over the words of fallible men.
Which, according to you, was written down by fallible men, edited by fallible men, translated by fallible men, and interpretted by fallible men. Hmm....you think they might've made a few mistakes here and there?
It's more in line with the demonstrable evidence.
To other readers, this means that it is completely NOT in line with ANY evidence.
The problem is not with incredulity, it's 'the credulous' that I find interesting.
Actually it is, even in the last sentence of the first paragraph you use incredulity as a basis for your argument.
I hunt for the truth