Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Smelling The Coffee: 2010
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5952
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.7


Message 182 of 270 (543434)
01-18-2010 3:40 AM
Reply to: Message 170 by Buzsaw
01-17-2010 7:17 PM


Re: Its Education, Stupid
Uh, Buz, what is your particular version of the US public education system? And how does it measure up to history?
From what I can find, the federal government (that is what you have been talking about, isn't it?) did not have anything to say about what was supposed to be taught, but rather just that communities should provide for education. The beginning of a system of public education itself started with a Unitarian named Horace Mann (History of education in the United States - Wikipedia):
quote:
Mann reforms
Education reformers such as Horace Mann of Massachusetts began calling for public education systems for all. Upon becoming the secretary of education in Massachusetts in 1837, Mann helped to create a statewide system, based on the Prussian model[17], of "common schools," which referred to the belief that everyone was entitled to the same content in education. These early efforts focused primarily on elementary education. The common-school movement began to catch on in the North. Connecticut adopted a similar system in 1849, and Massachusetts passed a compulsory attendance law in 1852.
1837. Gee, isn't that a bit after the Founding Fathers?
OBTW, one of the things that Horace Mann stressed and actually included as one of his six main principles was " that this education must be non-sectarian". As I would say to the leader of the Boy Scouts of America who profess that they are "absolutely non-sectarian" and yet arbitrarily require an distinctly sectarian religious belief (which is not required by their regulations or by-laws, which is contrary to the same, and which has been explicitly denied by explicit statements by the BSA leadership), "What part of 'non-sectarian' do you not understand?".
.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by Buzsaw, posted 01-17-2010 7:17 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024