Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,921 Year: 4,178/9,624 Month: 1,049/974 Week: 8/368 Day: 8/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation as presented in Genesis chapters 1 and 2
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 316 of 607 (565667)
06-18-2010 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 313 by jaywill
06-18-2010 7:31 PM


Re: I Give Up
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes:
For a season we had some pretty good fellowship. I sense now your fed up with having your teaching closely examined in some aspects.
I do not mind anything I present being questioned or discussed.
But you keep dragging in types, symbolism when I want to discuss what the literal text says.
If you really want to question what I have affirmed why don't you rebutt the following using the texts referred to in the OP.
In Message 1 I said:
ICANT writes:
In this thread I will affirm that there are 2 creations presented in Genesis chapter 1 and 2.
In this thread the KJV, LXX and Hebrew text will be used.
The Bible will be the final authority as that is what we will be discussing.
In Message 45 I said:
ICANT writes:
In Message 36 I presented the following things I know because Genesis states the following things.
ICANT writes:
I know from verse 1 the heaven and the earth was (bara) created.
I know from verse 2 it had become uninhabitable as it was covered with water.
I know from verse 3 God caused light to be on the earth. It says nothing about Him (bara) creating the light. He just made it visible.
I know from verse 4 God divided the light from the darkness. It was dark on half of the earth and light on the other half of the earth.
I know from verse 5 God called the light day and the darkness night. It also tells me a light period and a dark period equals one day.
The light period of Genesis 1:1 and the dark period that ended with the light period of the second day was declared the first day.
I know from verse 6, 7, and 8 that God separated the waters from the uplifted waters and called that atmosphere heaven. This is where the birds and our airplanes fly.
I know from verse 8 the light period that began with the end of the dark period of the first day and ended with the light period of the third day was the second day.
I know from verse 9 that God caused all the water to gather in one place and let dry land appear as it is shown in my avatar.
I know from verse 10 that God called the dry land earth and the water sea.
So far nothing has been created only rearranged.
I know from verse 11 that God had the earth bring forth grass, herbs, and fruit trees, from their seed which was upon the earth.
I know from verse 12 that the earth obeyed and produced grass, herbs, and fruit trees.
I know from verse 13 the light period that began with the end of the dark period of the second day and ended with the light period of the fourth day was the third day.
I know from verse 14 and 15 that God caused visible lights in the heavens to be for signs and seasons, days and years and to give light upon the earth.
I know from verse 16, 17 and 18 that God caused two great lights to be visible on earth one to rule the day and one to rule the night. He also caused the stars to be visible on earth.
Still nothing has been (bara) created they were only made visible on earth.
I know from verse 19 the light period that began with the end of the dark period of the third day and ended with the light period of the fifth day was the fourth day.
I know from verse 20 that God caused the waters to bring forth water creatures and fowl to fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Still nothing (bara) created.
I know from verse 21 that God (bara) created great whales.
The first thing created that was not created in Genesis 1:1.
I know from verse 22 that God blessed them and told them to multiply and fill the waters and the fowl to multiply on the earth.
I know from verse 23 the light period that began with the end of the dark period of the fourth day and ended with the light period of the sixth day was the fifth day.
I know from verse 24 and 25 God called the living creature, cattle, creeping things, and beasts of the earth after their kind. That means they had already existed to come forth after their kind.
I know from verse 26 and 27 that God (bara) created mankind in His image male and female He created them. Did He create 2 or a thousand there is no way to know as the scripture does not say. He gave mankind dominion over the creatures on earth.
I know from verse 28 God blessed them and told them to be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth and subdue it.
I know from verse 29 that God told them they could eat of every herb bearing seed and every tree that yielded fruit with a seed. No fruit of any tree was forbiden to mankind.
I know from verse 30 that the fowl of the air and every thing that creepeth on the earth that every green herb was given for meat.
I know from verse 31 the light period that began with the end of the dark period of the fifth day and ended with the light period of the seventh day was the sixth day.
On to chapter 2.
I know from verse 1 everything was finished.
I know from verse 2 that God ceased His preparing and furnishing the earth. God had completed His creative work.
I know from verse 3 that God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it. By ceasing His work.
I am affirming all of the things listed above as what Moses recorded in Genesis 1:1 through Genesis 2:3.
If you disagree with what I have affirmed please present your rebuttal for discussion.
I was very specific in what I wanted to do in this thread because I did not want to get bogged down in discussing everything in the Bible as that consumes too much time.
Besides I thought it was about time an actual debate took place.
The problem is everybody wants to tell me I am wrong but nobody wants to rebutt what I have actually affirmed.
Would you care to give it a go?
We can discuss all the other subjects you want to bring up but lets limit the scope of what we are affirming then stick to the format.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 313 by jaywill, posted 06-18-2010 7:31 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 317 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 7:35 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 318 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 8:09 AM ICANT has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 317 of 607 (565683)
06-19-2010 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 316 by ICANT
06-18-2010 10:42 PM


Re: I Give Up
But you keep dragging in types, symbolism when I want to discuss what the literal text says.
It is my habit that I do not refer to any symbolism, type or shadow in Scripture that I cannot back up with plain teaching.
Now Ephesians chapter five contains apostolic teaching that Adam and his wife Eve represent the great mystery of Christ and the church.
Any symbolism I may "drag" into the discussion, I make sure there is plain teaching to confirm.
Granted, I did not read your OP. But I have followed many of your points and not simply to be disagreeable.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by ICANT, posted 06-18-2010 10:42 PM ICANT has not replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 318 of 607 (565688)
06-19-2010 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 316 by ICANT
06-18-2010 10:42 PM


Re: I Give Up
I was very specific in what I wanted to do in this thread because I did not want to get bogged down in discussing everything in the Bible as that consumes too much time.
Besides I thought it was about time an actual debate took place.
The problem is everybody wants to tell me I am wrong but nobody wants to rebutt what I have actually affirmed.
Would you care to give it a go?
We can discuss all the other subjects you want to bring up but lets limit the scope of what we are affirming then stick to the format.
If this means not questioning that Adam in Genesis Two cannot be the man created in Genesis One, then I suppose this is not the discussion I should be in.
Because that has been my point. That this is an error and the introduction of problems into Christian theology.
I have no problem with so-called "Gap Theory". Well, no major problems. I would not say there are no problems at all to the interpretation. But I have been convinced of an interval of unspecified time between Gen. 1:1 and 1:2.
My discussion has been on what you have done to obscure the creation of man. What I am hearing from you is that I have to dumb down some of my exposition because some aspects of it never occured to you and sound fanciful and strange.
Okay. I accept that. Your tone is a bit cynical at times. But I accept that you don't appreciate certain things about the whole eternal purpose of God seen in symbols AND in plain teaching about Christ and the New Jerusalem.
Day everywhere [yom] doesn't always mean a typical 24 hours.
So I think your error is in interpreting Genesis 5:1 as not possibly meaning basically the same thing as Genesis 1:26,27.
And the structure you build on this foundation (that the formed man could not be the created man and the built woman could not be the created female) introduces some problems to understanding the Bible and God's economy.
If scrutinizing that concept is off the subject of your OP then I guess I am in the wrong discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by ICANT, posted 06-18-2010 10:42 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 319 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 1:39 PM jaywill has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 319 of 607 (565701)
06-19-2010 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 318 by jaywill
06-19-2010 8:09 AM


Re: I Give Up
Hi jay,
jaywill writes:
If this means not questioning that Adam in Genesis Two cannot be the man created in Genesis One, then I suppose this is not the discussion I should be in.
Because that has been my point. That this is an error and the introduction of problems into Christian theology.
I have no problem with you questioning whether there is one or two different men in Genesis chapter 1 and chapter 2.
I do have a problem when anyone ignores what the text says and try to prove their point by what someone else says.
I believe the Bible is the Word of God.
I know that it has been copied by mankind.
I am not naive enough to believe some of them did not taint the Word.
Thus the need for the Holy Spirit to lead us in all truth.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
I believe that is a fact.
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
I believe that is a fact.
Genesis 2:5-Genesis 4:24 are these generations spoken of in Genesis 2:4.
I believe that is a fact.
You don't have a problem with fact #1.
You do have a problem with the other two. Yet you agree that the text says certain things.
Now let me ask a couple of questions about Genesis 2:4.
1. Does the text say, "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created"? YES/NO
2. Does the text say, "in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"? YES/NO
What problem do you have with the word day in this verse?
Can God tell a lie? YES/NO
Genesis 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
God told the man the day he ate the fruit he would die.
Did God lie? YES/NO OR Did the man die the same day he ate the fruit? YES/NO
jaywill writes:
Day everywhere [yom] doesn't always mean a typical 24 hours.
So I think your error is in interpreting Genesis 5:1 as not possibly meaning basically the same thing as Genesis 1:26,27.
Where have I ever said Genesis 5:1 is not the generations of the mankind created in Genesis 1:27?
I have many posts that claim it is a fact that Genesis 5:1 refers to the mankind created in Genesis 1:27 and no one else.
What relationship does these two statements have with each other?
yowm according to God is a light period or a combination of a light period and a dark period.
Evidence
Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
God called the light day.
God called the darkness night.
God called the light portion and the dark portion the first day.
I do know that every yowm after that statement involved a light period and a dark period.
If you know a yowm that does not involve a light period and a dark period present it.
A yowm is determined by the rotation of the earth in relation to the sun, which gives us a light period and a dark period, which when combined constitute a yowm, according to God's definition of yowm.
Hebrew word yowm occurs 2287 times in 1931 verses in OT.
Greek word smeron occurs 41 times in 40 verses in the NT.
Greek word hmera occurs 389 times in 366 verses. Means the light period
Which of the 2287 times yowm appears does it mean something other than a light period or a combination of a light and dark period, or a multitude of light and dark periods which is the plural of day?
You say day does not always mean day as defined by God. So take your best shot. Give me the best ten examples you have or can come up with and we will discuss them.
jaywill writes:
And the structure you build on this foundation (that the formed man could not be the created man and the built woman could not be the created female) introduces some problems to understanding the Bible and God's economy.
It is no problem once you accept what the Bible says.
But for the moment answer the above questions and then present your best examples of yowm not being a day as described by God.
And look out Peg loves this discussion.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 318 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 8:09 AM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 320 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 7:12 PM ICANT has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 320 of 607 (565725)
06-19-2010 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 319 by ICANT
06-19-2010 1:39 PM


Re: I Give Up
I do have a problem when anyone ignores what the text says and try to prove their point by what someone else says.
I believe the Bible is the Word of God.
I think that you have ignored much of what I wrote. You dismissed it and said something to the effect of "Where do you get this nonsense?"
I feel you have ignored quite a bit of what I presented from Ephesians and Colossians. Maybe there is something I didn't read.
Unfortunetly my Strong's Exhaustive Concordance got so dog eared that I had to throw it away. To point out some other uses of yowm that is what I need.
I will be looking into usages of yowm.
I actually have rested my case on other grounds. Man made on Day 1 and Man created on Day 6, is an error.
Man made prior to Day 6 is an error, I do believe.
And when one begins to assume passages that do not agree with one's theology are the tainted ones representing human error then you have a license to reject many things that are also written in the Bible.
It is too easy to simply dismiss what goes against your theological thoughts as errors intoduced into the text.
It sounds suspicious if this is the last resort reasoning for rejecting what does not confirm one's theological views.
So I am still trying to figure out why the New Testament would again and again refer to the Adam of Genesis chapter two when the man created in the image of God without a soul in chapter one is the main thing.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 319 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 1:39 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 323 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 8:38 PM jaywill has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 321 of 607 (565726)
06-19-2010 7:32 PM


You do have a problem with the other two. Yet you agree that the text says certain things.
Now let me ask a couple of questions about Genesis 2:4.
1. Does the text say, "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created"? YES/NO
2. Does the text say, "in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"? YES/NO
What problem do you have with the word day in this verse?
Can God tell a lie? YES/NO
No, God does not lie.
I have a problem with an interpretation that teaches that Adam was made on Day #1 but Man was created on Day #6.
That is probably a wrong interpretation of that passage.

Replies to this message:
 Message 325 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 9:48 PM jaywill has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 322 of 607 (565727)
06-19-2010 7:50 PM


YOM for starters. ( And this discussion does not mean that I subscribe to a Day Age interpretation of Genesis necessarily)
Copied without permission from http://www.answersincreation.org/word_study_yom.htm :
Hebrew Dictionaries
Let’s start with the possible meanings of Yom;
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (1980, Moody Press)
"It can denote: 1. the period of light (as contrasted with the period of darkness), 2. the period of twenty-four hours, 3. a general vague "time," 4. a point of time, 5. a year (in the plural; I Sam 27:7; Ex 13:10, etc.)."
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (symbols omitted)
from an unused root meaning to be hot; a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figuratively (a space of time defined by an associated term), [often used adv.]:--age, + always, + chronicles, continually (-ance), daily, ([birth-], each, to) day, (now a, two) days (agone), + elder, end, evening, (for)ever(lasting), ever(more), full, life, as long as (...live), even now, old, outlived, perpetually, presently, remaineth, required, season, since, space, then, (process of) time, as at other times, in trouble, weather (as) when, (a, the, within a) while (that), whole (age), (full) year (-ly), younger
As you can see, Hebrew dictionaries attest to the fact that the word Yom is used for anywhere from 12 hours up to a year, and even a vague "time period" of unspecified length.
Other Uses of Yom
Day is not the only translation for the word Yom. Here are some other uses.
Time
It is interesting to note that in 67 verses in the Old Testament, the word Yom is translated into the English word "time." For instance, in Genesis 4:3, it says "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord." In this instance, Yom refers to a growing season, probably several months. Again, in Deuteronomy 10:10, it refers to a "time" equal to forty days. In I Kings 11:42, it says "And the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years." In this case, Yom translated as the word "time" is equivalent to a 40 year period.
In Isaiah 30:8, it says "Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever." In this case, Yom is equal to "forever." How long is forever? An infinite number of years...billions upon billions upon billons of years. If Yom can equal trillions of years here, then why not billions of years in Genesis?
Year
Four times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "year." In I Kings 1:1, "David was old and stricken in years..." In 2 Chronicles 21:19, "after the end of two years" and in the very next verse "Thirty and two years old." Finally, in Amos 4:4, "...and your tithes after three years." In each case, Yom represents years, not days.
Age
Eight times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "age." These range from sentences like "stricken in age," meaning old age (Genesis 18:11 and 24:1; Joshua 23:1 and 23:2), and other times it says "old age" (Genesis 21:2, Genesis 21:7). Genesis 47:28 refers to "the whole age of Jacob," therefore yom here refers to an entire lifetime. In Zechariah 8:4, it says old men and women will sit in the streets of Jerusalem, "each with cane in hand because of his age."
Ago
One time Yom is translated "ago." 1 Samuel 9:20 says "As for the donkeys you lost three days ago, ..."
Always
Four times yom is translated as "always," in Deuteronomy 5:29, 6:24, 14:23, and in 2 Chronicles 18:7. Always here can be interpreted as a lifetime...for instance, we are to keep the commandments of the Lord always (Deut. 5:29).
Season
Three times yom is translated "season." In Genesis 40:4, "...and they continued a season in ward." Again, in Joshua 24:7, "dwelt in the wilderness a long season," and in 2 Chronicles 15:3, "...a long season Israel hath been...". In each case yom represents a multi-month period.
Chronicles
When used in conjunction with the word dbr, yom is translated "chronicles" (27 times).
Continually
When used in conjunction with kwl, yom is translated as "continually" (11 times). Once, in Psalm 139:16, it is translated continuance (without the kwl).
Ever
Ever is used to represent a long period of time, such as in Deuteronomy 19:9, "to walk ever in his ways." Nineteen times Yom is translated "ever." The old testament uses "for ever" instead of the word forever. In sixteen cases of use of the word ever, for is placed before it, indicating a infinite period of time. I will not list them all (consult Strong's Concordance for a full listing) but here is an example. In Psalm 23:6, it says "Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life; and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever." Here Yom is translated as the final word of this verse, ever. Thus, Yom in this verse, and 16 others, represents eternity.
Evermore
In one instance, when yom is used in conjunction with kwl, Yom is translated "evermore." Deuteronomy 28:29, "...and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore;" thus representing either a lifetime or eternity.
Word Usage in the Old Testament
As you can see, Yom is used in a wide variety of situations related to the concept of time. Yom is not just for days...it is for time in general. How it is translated depends on the context of its use with other words.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 326 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 1:04 AM jaywill has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 323 of 607 (565729)
06-19-2010 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 320 by jaywill
06-19-2010 7:12 PM


Re: I Give Up
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes:
So I am still trying to figure out why the New Testament would again and again refer to the Adam of Genesis chapter two when the man created in the image of God without a soul in chapter one is the main thing.
The one in chapter 2 is the only one that could have the choice of eating from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
This man had the opportunity to become as God and he chose to do so.
Because of that choice sin entered the universe.
Because of that choice death entered the universe.
Because of that choice all mankind was separated from God.
So he is the one that brought all the problems on so he was more important that the man created in Genesis 1:27.
That man was created in the image/likeness of God.
He was just like you.
Question: If he was created in the image/likeness of God how could he become like God?
He was already like God when created.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 320 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 7:12 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 324 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 9:02 PM ICANT has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 324 of 607 (565731)
06-19-2010 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 323 by ICANT
06-19-2010 8:38 PM


Re: I Give Up
Question: If he was created in the image/likeness of God how could he become like God?
He was already like God when created.
I already discussed this before.
Man was created as a vessel to contain God. By eating of the tree of life the man made in God's image would be filled with God. Do you remember me speaking about the glove and the hand in the glove ?
There is no difference in the two men.
The created man was also formed of the dust of the ground and placed before the tree of life which signified God's uncreated divine life.
When the man created in the image of God took of the other tree he was instead united with Satan. He became Satanified.
You apparently didn't get this too well when I spoke to it some posts back.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 323 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 8:38 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 327 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 1:11 AM jaywill has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 325 of 607 (565735)
06-19-2010 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 321 by jaywill
06-19-2010 7:32 PM


Re: Lie
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes:
No, God does not lie.
I have a problem with an interpretation that teaches that Adam was made on Day #1 but Man was created on Day #6.
That is probably a wrong interpretation of that passage.
I think God would have to have lied if it is a wrong interpretation.
So why not answer the two questions you failed to answer?
1. Does the text say, "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created"? YES/NO
2. Does the text say, "in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"? YES/NO
If God can't lie He said through Moses "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created.
He then narrowed it down to the DAY He created the heaven and the earth.
Could this have been accomplished over a long period of existence? Sure. God is existence. He has always existed and will always exist. Time is a little segment of eternal existence marked off for mankind.
But time was not marked off until darkness closed out the first light period DAY in which God created the heaven and the earth.
There is no way to measure that time other than by science. Science tell us it was billions of years. I think they are off a few trillion, trillion, trillion,Unvigintillion, Unvigintillion, years if there was any real way to measure that existence. (That is my imagination working) Because time did not exist only an eternal period of light, DAY.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 7:32 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 328 by jaywill, posted 06-20-2010 6:43 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 330 by jaywill, posted 06-20-2010 7:55 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 326 of 607 (565742)
06-20-2010 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 322 by jaywill
06-19-2010 7:50 PM


Re: Day
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes:
Let’s start with the possible meanings of Yom;
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (1980, Moody Press)
"It can denote: 1. the period of light (as contrasted with the period of darkness), 2. the period of twenty-four hours, 3. a general vague "time," 4. a point of time, 5. a year (in the plural; I Sam 27:7; Ex 13:10, etc.)."
#1 The period of Light. Genesis 1:5 And God called the light Day,
#2. The period of twenty-four hours, God called a light period and a dark period the second day. Genesis 1:8 And the evening and the morning were the second day.
The primary meaning matches God's definition.
The secondary meaning matches God's definition.
That is all the definitions God has anything else is manufactured by mankind.
jaywill writes:
from an unused root meaning to be hot; a day (as the warm hours), whether literal (from sunrise to sunset, or from one sunset to the next), or figuratively (a space of time defined by an associated term), [often used adv.]:--age, + always, + chronicles, continually (-ance), daily, ([birth-], each, to) day, (now a, two) days (agone), + elder, end, evening, (for)ever(lasting), ever(more), full, life, as long as (...live), even now, old, outlived, perpetually, presently, remaineth, required, season, since, space, then, (process of) time, as at other times, in trouble, weather (as) when, (a, the, within a) while (that), whole (age), (full) year (-ly), younger
From an unused root meaning to be hot: these words belong in the Etymology. Everything else is commentary.
jaywill writes:
As you can see, Hebrew dictionaries attest to the fact that the word Yom is used for anywhere from 12 hours up to a year, and even a vague "time period" of unspecified length.
I have no problem with a light period lasting for a very long time.
We have one that lasted from the beginning until darkness in Genesis 1:2.
We will have another when we have the New Heaven and the New Earth.
John writes:
Revvelation 22:5 And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
jaywill writes:
It is interesting to note that in 67 verses in the Old Testament, the word Yom is translated into the English word "time." For instance, in Genesis 4:3, it says "And in process of time it came to pass, that Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the Lord." In this instance, Yom refers to a growing season, probably several months.
If Genesis 4:3 took place in the DAY the Lord God created the Heaven and the Earth as the text declares there was only a light period.
jaywill writes:
Again, in Deuteronomy 10:10, it refers to a "time" equal to forty days.
What is wrong with a plural of days being refered to as time?
One day is not refered to as time. But a plural of days.
jaywill writes:
In I Kings 11:42, it says "And the time that Solomon reigned in Jerusalem over all Israel was forty years." In this case, Yom translated as the word "time" is equivalent to a 40 year period.
Had days been used instead of time it would have been a more correct translation.
When yowm is plural it means a multiple of day which equals days.
jaywill writes:
Four times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "year." In I Kings 1:1, "David was old and stricken in years..."
So why did they not translate it days. Would have meant the same.
jaywill writes:
In 2 Chronicles 21:19, "after the end of two years" and in the very next verse "Thirty and two years old."
Lets back up a few verses.
2Ch 21:5 Jehoram 3088 [was] thirty 7970 and two 8147 years 8141 old 1121 when he began to reign 4427 , and he reigned 4427 eight 8083 years 8141 in Jerusalem 3389.
The number in these verses are strong's numbers.
Notice the number for years 8141 shaneh (in pl. only),
This Hebrew word means:
1) year
a) as division of time
b) as measure of time
c) as indication of age
d) a lifetime (of years of life)
Now to the verse you mentioned.
2Ch 21:19 And it came to pass, that in process of time 3117, after 3318 6256 the end 7093 of two 8147 years 3117, his bowels 4578 fell out 3318 by reason 5973 of his sickness 2483: so he died 4191 of sore 7451 diseases 8463. And his people 5971 made 6213 no burning 8316 for him, like the burning 8316 of his fathers 1.
Notice the number for the word translated years 3117 is yowm
If you will notice "And it came to pass, that in process of time" is all translated from yowm
Do you think it possible the writer forgot what the word for years was in the course of 14 verses? Or was the translators taking liberty to try to make the Hebrew language understandable.
jaywill writes:
Finally, in Amos 4:4, "...and your tithes after three years."
Amo 4:4 Come 935 to Bethel 1008, and transgress 6586 ; at Gilgal 1537 multiply 7235 transgression 6586 ; and bring 935 your sacrifices 2077 every morning 1242, [and] your tithes 4643 after three 7969 years 3117:
The words in the Hebrew would be: Come 935 Bethel 1008, transgress 6586 ; Gilgal 1537 multiply 7235 transgression 6586 ; bring 935 sacrifices 2077 morning 1242, tithes 4643 three 7969 days 3117: This is word for word translation.
The writer knew the Hebrew word for years as it appears in Amos 2:10 and 5:25.
jaywill writes:
In each case, Yom represents years, not days.
In no case does yowm repesent years.
In the verses you presented the translators used years instead of days. So the translators was telling you it was years instead of days. The meaning of words do not change. The translators did try to make the Hebrew language understandable. You should have see us as we tried speak as they did and understand their language in Hebrew class. It was a comedy in action.
jaywill writes:
Eight times in the Old Testament Yom is translated "age." These range from sentences like "stricken in age," meaning old age (Genesis 18:11 and 24:1;
Gen 18:11 Now Abraham 85 and Sarah 8283 [were] old 2205 [and] well stricken 935 in age 3117; [and] it ceased 2308 to be with Sarah 8283 after the manner 734 of women 802.
Gen 24:1 And Abraham 85 was old 2204 , [and] well stricken 935 in age 3117: and the LORD 3068 had blessed 1288 Abraham 85 in all things.
Days would have given the same meaning and been an accurate translation.
In
Gen 25:8 Then Abraham 85 gave up the ghost 1478 , and died 4191 in a good 2896 old age 7872, an old man 2205, and full 7649 [of years]; and was gathered 622 to his people 5971.
The Hebrew word seybah which means age was used so Moses knew what word to use for age.
jaywill writes:
Joshua 23:1 and 23:2),
Jos 23:1 And it came to pass a long 7227 time 3117 after 310 that the LORD 3068 had given rest 5117 unto Israel 3478 from all their enemies 341 round about 5439, that Joshua 3091 waxed old 2204 [and] stricken 935 in age 3117.
Jos 23:2 And Joshua 3091 called 7121 for all Israel 3478, [and] for their elders 2205, and for their heads 7218, and for their judges 8199 , and for their officers 7860 , and said 559 unto them, I am old 2204 [and] stricken 935 in age 3117:
Days would give the same meaning.
jaywill writes:
and other times it says "old age" (Genesis 21:2, Genesis 21:7).
Gen 21:2 For Sarah 8283 conceived 2029 , and bare 3205 Abraham 85 a son 1121 in his old age 2208, at the set time 4150 of which God 430 had spoken 1696 to him.
Gen 21:7 And she said 559 , Who would have said 4448 unto Abraham 85, that Sarah 8283 should have given children 1121 suck 3243 ? for I have born 3205 [him] a son 1121 in his old age 2208.
The number 2208 Hebrew word zaqun means 1) old age, extreme old age.
If you pay close attention 2208 is used in both verses.
Your source sucks they can't even get verses where yowm is translated as something other than day or days.
jaywill writes:
Genesis 47:28 refers to "the whole age of Jacob," therefore yom here refers to an entire lifetime.
Gen 47:28 And Jacob 3290 lived 2421 in the land 776 of Egypt 4714 seventeen 6240 7651 years 8141: so the whole age 2416 3117 of Jacob 3290 was an hundred 3967 forty 705 8141 and seven 7651 years 8141.
so the whole age 2416 3117
2416 Hebrew word chay meaning 1) living, alive
3117 yowm Hebrew word meaning day or days in this case.
Please notice Moses knew the word for years 3141 shaneh (in pl.),
jaywill writes:
In Zechariah 8:4, it says old men and women will sit in the streets of Jerusalem, "each with cane in hand because of his age."
Zec 8:4 Thus saith 559 the LORD 3068 of hosts 6635; There shall yet old men 2205 and old women 2205 dwell 3427 in the streets 7339 of Jerusalem 3389, and every man 376 with his staff 4938 in his hand 3027 for very 7230 age 3117.
for very 7230 Hebrew word rob means 1) multitude, abundance, greatness.
What would have been wrong with translating the words which would have said multitude days?
jaywill writes:
Ago
One time Yom is translated "ago." 1 Samuel 9:20 says "As for the donkeys you lost three days ago, ..."
1Sa 9:20 And as for thine asses 860 that were lost 6 three 7969 days 3117 ago 3117, set 7760 not thy mind 3820 on them; for they are found 4672 . And on whom [is] all the desire 2532 of Israel 3478? [Is it] not on thee, and on all thy father's 1 house 1004?
3117 appears in the Hebrew text only one time so the second one was added by the translators unless they had a different text than my program has, and it has several.
jaywill writes:
Always
Four times yom is translated as "always," in Deuteronomy 5:29, 6:24, 14:23, and in 2 Chronicles 18:7. Always here can be interpreted as a lifetime...for instance, we are to keep the commandments of the Lord always (Deut. 5:29).
Deu 5:29 O that there were such 2088 an 4310 heart 3824 in them 5414 , that they would fear 3372 me, and keep 8104 all my commandments 4687 always 3117, that it might be well 3190 with them, and with their children 1121 for ever 5769!
I would have translated yowm as daily.
Deu 6:24 And the LORD 3068 commanded 6680 us to do 6213 all these statutes 2706, to fear 3372 the LORD 3068 our God 430, for our good 2896 always 3117, that he might preserve us alive 2421 , as [it is] at this day 3117.
Again daily.
I wonder why your source did not use
Deu 11:12 A land 776 which the LORD 3068 thy God 430 careth for 1875 : the eyes 5869 of the LORD 3068 thy God 430 [are] always 8548 upon it, from the beginning 7225 of the year 8141 even unto the end 319 of the year 8141.
always 8548 Hebrew word tamiyd which means 1) continuity, perpetuity, to stretch.
Deu 14:23 And thou shalt eat 398 before 6440 the LORD 3068 thy God 430, in the place 4725 which he shall choose 977 to place 7931 his name 8034 there, the tithe 4643 of thy corn 1715, of thy wine 8492, and of thine oil 3323, and the firstlings 1062 of thy herds 1241 and of thy flocks 6629; that thou mayest learn 3925 to fear 3372 the LORD 3068 thy God 430 always 3117.
Daily would suffice.
I wonder why your source did not use:
1Ch 16:15 Be ye mindful 2142 always 5769 of his covenant 1285; the word 1697 [which] he commanded 6680 to a thousand 505 generations 1755;
always 5769 another Hebrew word `owlam which means 1) long duration, antiquity, futurity, for ever, ever, everlasting,
You see the Hebrew language had words that was not used.
2Ch 18:7 And the king 4428 of Israel 3478 said 559 unto Jehoshaphat 3092, [There is] yet one 259 man 376, by whom we may enquire 1875 of the LORD 3068: but I hate 8130 him; for he never prophesied 5012 good 2896 unto me, but always 3117 evil 7451: the same [is] Micaiah 4321 the son 1121 of Imla 3229. And Jehoshaphat 3092 said 559 , Let not the king 4428 say 559 so.
unto me, but always 3117 they got a little creative with that one didn't they. It would have been better to leave it good daily....
jaywill writes:
Season
Three times yom is translated "season." In Genesis 40:4, "...and they continued a season in ward." Again, in Joshua 24:7, "dwelt in the wilderness a long season," and in 2 Chronicles 15:3, "...a long season Israel hath been...". In each case yom represents a multi-month period.
Gen 40:4 And the captain 8269 of the guard 2876 charged 6485 Joseph 3130 with them, and he served 8334 them: and they continued a season 3117 in ward 4929.
them: and they continued a season 3117, this entire phrase comes from the word yowm.
Prisoners count their time in jail in days.
Jos 24:7 And when they cried 6817 unto the LORD 3068, he put 7760 darkness 3990 between you and the Egyptians 4713, and brought 935 the sea 3220 upon them, and covered 3680 them; and your eyes 5869 have seen 7200 what I have done 6213 in Egypt 4714: and ye dwelt 3427 in the wilderness 4057 a long 7227 season 3117.
a long 7227 Hebrew word rab which means 1) much, many, great.
season 3117 Hebrew word yowm means day, days
Translation of these two words "many days".
2Ch 15:3 Now for a long 7227 season 3117 Israel 3478 [hath been] without 3808 the true 571 God 430, and without a teaching 3384 priest 3548, and without law 8451.
You have the same construction here.
jaywill writes:
Chronicles
When used in conjunction with the word dbr, yom is translated "chronicles" (27 times).
And in each instantance days would have been just as good.
jaywill writes:
When used in conjunction with kwl, yom is translated as "continually" (11 times). Once, in Psalm 139:16, it is translated continuance (without the kwl).
Continually is in the OT 74 times.
Yowm was translated continually 10 times and daily would have been just as good, and more accurate.
The Hebrew word for continually is tamiyd which means: 1) continuity, perpetuity, to stretch.
jaywill writes:
In one instance, when yom is used in conjunction with kwl, Yom is translated "evermore." Deuteronomy 28:29, "...and thou shalt be only oppressed and spoiled evermore;" thus representing either a lifetime or eternity.
Daily would be fine. But an eternal day would be better.
Because in eternity there will be only now, existence.
jaywill writes:
As you can see, Yom is used in a wide variety of situations related to the concept of time. Yom is not just for days...it is for time in general. How it is translated depends on the context of its use with other words.
The word yowm can be used any way someone might choose to use it.
But when used correctly it means day or days nothing more or less.
I hope you appreciate the 4 hours I spent chasing down things that I already knew so I could point them out to you.
You need to check your source material and make sure the people you are following know what they are talking about.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 322 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 7:50 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 329 by jaywill, posted 06-20-2010 7:16 AM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.7


Message 327 of 607 (565743)
06-20-2010 1:11 AM
Reply to: Message 324 by jaywill
06-19-2010 9:02 PM


Re: I Give Up
Hi Jay,
jaywill writes:
Man was created as a vessel to contain God. By eating of the tree of life the man made in God's image would be filled with God. Do you remember me speaking about the glove and the hand in the glove ?
Which man eat of the tree of life?
If you talking about the man formed from the dust of the ground that was placed in the garden with the tree of life who ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
He was drove out of the garden so he could not eat of the tree and live forever in a sinful condition.
Moses writes:
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 324 by jaywill, posted 06-19-2010 9:02 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 332 by jaywill, posted 06-20-2010 8:20 AM ICANT has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 328 of 607 (565759)
06-20-2010 6:43 AM
Reply to: Message 325 by ICANT
06-19-2010 9:48 PM


Re: Lie
I think God would have to have lied if it is a wrong interpretation.
I understand. But I don't think it is the case of a lie but of how it should be interpreted in a way making the most sense with the rest of the Bible.
I start there anyway.
So why not answer the two questions you failed to answer?
I did not fail to answer. This verse has been refered to a number of times in my writing.
1. Does the text say, "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created"? YES/NO
YES
2. Does the text say, "in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"? YES/NO
I already answered this. YES. However, the RcV (Recovery Version) which I mostly use says "When" in the text. And at the bottom of the page the footenote says [Lit., in the day]
If you recall me writing that then you know I have not "failed" to address this question basically.
If God can't lie He said through Moses "these are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created.
He then narrowed it down to the DAY He created the heaven and the earth.
It may narrow down to how YOM is understood in that context.
Could this have been accomplished over a long period of existence? Sure. God is existence. He has always existed and will always exist. Time is a little segment of eternal existence marked off for mankind.
But time was not marked off until darkness closed out the first light period DAY in which God created the heaven and the earth.
There is no way to measure that time other than by science. Science tell us it was billions of years. I think they are off a few trillion, trillion, trillion,Unvigintillion, Unvigintillion, years if there was any real way to measure that existence. (That is my imagination working) Because time did not exist only an eternal period of light, DAY.
That's a helpful thought.
But the Hebrew YOM could also be used in a way NOT being delimited by the first marking off of the darkness by light.
It is permissible that YOM there could be understood as any of the Six Days. And I believe that from what Moses has written we should understand that he means to agree with what he previously wrote and not contradict it.
If he did contradict what he previously wrote, I think SOMETHING elsewhere in the Scripture should or would clue us. I find nothing to indicate, strongly enough for me, that this is the case.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 9:48 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 334 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 12:55 PM jaywill has not replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 329 of 607 (565760)
06-20-2010 7:16 AM
Reply to: Message 326 by ICANT
06-20-2010 1:04 AM


Re: Day
You four hour's labor on a technical rebuttal is noted. We all should thank you. Thanks.
I know what it is to labor on the word for a long time too. I will not simply dismiss it with an "Oh Boy another sermon" or "On to the next lecture", or even with "Where do you get this nonsense?".
However, I may submit your comments to a Hebrew scholar or two in the future for peer review.
I have no problem with a light period lasting for a very long time.
We have one that lasted from the beginning until darkness in Genesis 1:2.
I am not sure if I follow you well here. But here is DAY used in reference to pre-Adamic times:
"You were in Eden, the garden of God. Every precious stone was your covering, sardius, topaz, diamond, etc ...with gold. The workmanshuip of your tambourines and your pipes was prepared with you ON THE DAY that you were created. ... You were the anointed cherub who covered [the Ark]; indeed I set you, [so that] you were upon the holy mountain of God; you walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
You were perfect in your ways from THE DAY that you were created, until unrighteuosness was found in you." (See Ezekiel 28:13-15)
My purpose here is not to launch off into an exposition of Ezekiel 28. Suffice it to say that I take this passage as not refering to a human being but some superhuman personage.
I also regard "Eden" here as some pre-Adamic paradise. And while I don't presume to understand everything here, I think the English word DAY is used twice in the passage. And this is a glimpse into the prophetic past and the pre-Adamic origin of Satan.
It is before the Six Days restoration and further creation of man's world. It is before God uttered "Let there be light" and "day" is used.
We will have another when we have the New Heaven and the New Earth.
In the New Jerusalem there is no need for the light of the sun. However there are still twelve seasons to the nations surrounding the New Jerusalem who walk in its light. "[T]here will be no night there" refers to in the city.
Revelation 21:25 - "And its gates shall by no means be shut by day, for there will be no night there."
The twelve seasons suggest the sun still has some use to the nations on earth around the New Jerusalem (21:24), in my present understanding.
And those tormented in the lake of fire are so "day and night forever and ever" (Rev. 20:10) .
Thank God for His salvation in Christ.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 326 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 1:04 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 331 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 8:19 AM jaywill has replied

jaywill
Member (Idle past 1972 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 330 of 607 (565761)
06-20-2010 7:55 AM
Reply to: Message 325 by ICANT
06-19-2010 9:48 PM


Re: Lie
There is no way to measure that time other than by science. Science tell us it was billions of years. I think they are off a few trillion, trillion, trillion,Unvigintillion, Unvigintillion, years if there was any real way to measure that existence. (That is my imagination working) Because time did not exist only an eternal period of light, DAY.
When we look at time and space apart from faith we are so dwarfed by the immensity of both we tend to say with the Psalmist "What is man that You are mindful of him?"
Without the aid of God's word we are swallowed up into a sense of insignificance by both time and space.
Why, in so many billions of "years" would God use so little time to occupy Himself with man ?
Why in the midst of trillions of square miles of space and billions of galaxies would God be occupied with these little creatures on some insignificant speck of a second rate planet ?
So the word tells is that it is by faith we understand that God created the universe, and that with a purpose for human beings.
This is an aside comment. The main problem is your introduction of TWO humanities.
Tell me, in your view what were the descendents of Gen. 2 Adam doing while the descendents of Gen.1 Man were multiplying ?
Do you see them as living concurrently on the planet ?
Can you today detect who has Eve as their distant mother and who came from the first female/s created in Gen. 1 ?
Don't wait for me to extract this from your system like pulling theological teeth. Explain it clearly.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.
Edited by jaywill, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by ICANT, posted 06-19-2010 9:48 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 335 by ICANT, posted 06-20-2010 1:51 PM jaywill has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024